Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No they are very much different.

The R32 RB25DE N/A Head has the same designed/shape ports as the RB20DE/T but they are a decent amount larger.

The R33 RB25DE/T ports are slightly bigger than the R32 RB25DE BUT they appear to have slightly smaller valves (34mm on the inlet & 29mm on the exhaust vs the RB26DETT & R32 RB25DE's 35mm on the inlet and 29.5mm on the exhaust)

(RB20DET valves are 30mm inlet & 27mm exhaust, which explains the reason for needing so much more boost over the rb25 to make power)

This is by my measurements, not that valve size is relevant to your question but I find it interesting. :)

You could do a bit of chopping and welding of a R33 RB25DET Greedy plenum/inlet manifold with a rb20det inlet manifold but that would be the last resort. :D

hrmmmm.

doesnt make much sense to buy a greddy manifold and then tear it apart and spend who knows how much more money to make it work.

i think i will stick to the original plan and buy a r.i.p.s. manifold, they look the part and apparently peform very well.

hrm..... as for the valve bit guess i will (when i do) put oversized valves into the rb20 head as well as other bits.

Yep spend all the $$ you can on the inlet side of the RB20det to reduce that airflow/boost ratio.

kind of confuzzled on this, what exactly do you mean?

like less boost for more airflow? or more airflow for less boost?

kind of confuzzled on this, what exactly do you mean?

like less boost for more airflow? or more airflow for less boost?

With a better easier breathing head it doesn't require as much boost to achieve the same airflow in to the pots. Hence less boost is required to make the same or more power.

Boost is a measurement of restriction.

Look at how much boost the SOHC RB30 guys run.

Scratches head.. So if you had an RB25DE head will the rb20det inlet manifold fit on.

Yes it will BUT the ports of the RB20det inlet manifold are quite a bit smaller than the rb25de ports.

Best bet is to use the rb25de inletmanifold on the rb25de head with a rb20det plenum as it has all the fittings for the turbo requirements.

BlueRB24, great looking plenum...did you crunch any numbers with respect to runner lengths?

Nope thats not my car. But I have a manifold just like that. Getting parts like a intake manifold gasket is like finding gold. Takes a while to get those parts in. :D

i was just asking i dont need to use the intake plenum i wanted to use the inlet manifold and fuel rail so i can easliy adapt GTR injectors as the Rb25 is Side feed RB20 is top feed thought it would be alot easier and less stuffing around if i i just changed intakes.

hmmm but if the Rb20 is smaller then i would lose performance so i guess its not worth it then.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...