Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes thats the car and turbo, not near those figures yet tho unfortunately...:rofl:

Go's ok running 1bar, is line ball with a mates 12.7sec ute so looking forward to what it can do with proper boost control and some tuning

Well not as impressive as mr boostn32's 300rwkw claim, but the red top rb20 made 301rwhp today at 19psi with a nice tune to look after an aging motor. Many thanks to Hyperdrive who have taken the car from being weak as piss (240rwhp at 20psi) to where its at now.

hi, guys check out this gts4 rb20det in www.skylinesdownunder.com

I've been in the car, but not with power it has now, It has everthing done to it. Its been in one of those performance videos from nz pulling really good 1/4 time.

specs from site.

Make: NISSAN

Year/Model: 90 R32GTS-4 2.0ltr

Engine: PORT POLISED HEAD, CUSTOM EXHAUST MANIFOLD ,LAGE TURBO

Induction: CUSTOM INTAKE AND INTERCOOLER

Exhaust: 3 INCH MANDEL BENT STANLESS REAR MUFFER 5 INCH TIP

Drivetrain: 4WD , GTR BOX,4 PUK KEVLAR CERMIC CLUTCH

Body styling: FULL AFTER MARKET KIT VEILSIDE WING

Wheels & Rubber: 18 INCH CHROME ANTERAS WIT 265/35/18 DUNLOPS

R/W kW: 318kw@20psi

Quarter mile time: 11.703@116mph

im running 250lb in my rear with some reasonable bilistein shocks. Not too bad, but i would love to try the 500lb's i have sitting in my room  :D

Harder springs = less traction:cheers:

hi, guys check out this gts4 rb20det in www.skylinesdownunder.com

I've been in the car, but not with power it has now, It has everthing done to it. Its been in one of those performance videos from nz pulling really good 1/4 time.

specs from site.

Make: NISSAN  

Year/Model: 90 R32GTS-4 2.0ltr  

Engine: PORT POLISED HEAD, CUSTOM EXHAUST MANIFOLD ,LAGE TURBO  

Induction: CUSTOM INTAKE AND INTERCOOLER  

Exhaust: 3 INCH MANDEL BENT STANLESS REAR MUFFER 5 INCH TIP  

Drivetrain: 4WD , GTR BOX,4 PUK KEVLAR CERMIC CLUTCH  

Body styling: FULL AFTER MARKET KIT VEILSIDE WING  

Wheels & Rubber: 18 INCH CHROME ANTERAS WIT 265/35/18 DUNLOPS  

R/W kW: 318kw@20psi  

Quarter mile time: 11.703@116mph

11.7 and 116 mph = ~250 rwkw (that's on a roller dyno)

If it is a hub dyno, add 15 rwkw (no wheels or rollers).

265 rhkw (rear hub kilowatts)

Note no mention of camshafts:cheers:

im running 250lb in my rear with some reasonable bilistein shocks. Not too bad, but i would love to try the 500lb's i have sitting in my room  :D

I have 200lb springs in the rear of mine, with good even tyre ware, and really not a lot of squat. Id be looking at the shock setting.

Sydneykid, you stated harder springs equalling less traction. This statement I can understand with a live rear end but with the primitive design ( compared to later models ) of the HR31 IRS, soft springs, especially the standard gear send the rear into enomous negative camber lifting a lot of the rubber off the road.

Many owners have reported success in better traction and faster 1/4 mile times when going to harder rear suspension.

Harder springs = less traction:cheers:

Harder springs = Less Squat = More than 1/3 the tyre touching the ground

Its a fine line with a HR31 IRS... too soft, and you squat so much that i've had 1/3 the tyre only touching the ground from footage... and thats hardly gonna help the problem.

Since i've installed slightly harder bilisteing shocks (over the ones i had) its been noticeably better, not startling... but much better

Just some axle tramp to sort out now

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...