Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

a bad tradesman always blames his tools. The design of the malpassi has nothing wrong with it. The Application is always the reason it doesn't work the way it is supposed to.

I'm sure the people who have owned and correctly used the malpassi can guide you to a solution where this brand of regulator works perfectly, should you find another one lying around.

There are of course larger capacity regs in other brands if you need something that will flow a larger volume of fuel.

Okay, let's up the ante... Why put one on at all?

Reading through the previous threads, the debate is still inconclusive as to whether the stock unit is just as good. It sounds like it is capable up to a point, but where is that point?

I have been given a fuel reg (I was told it's a Malpassi but it has no markings) and I really don't want to put it on because of all the problems being experienced by others. The car is my daily driver and reliablity for me is a bigger issue than having a fuel reg that may not be any better than the stock item.

Why fix it if it ain't broke?

Can we put this one to bed?

It aint broke, but it makes it better, so your not fixing your improving. I put one on and noticed the difference. Turned down the pressure a bit more, noticed it being even better, and fuel economy went up (from where it was previously set). I think they are a worth while investment/ way to waste more money on the car, as cars are a waste of money :thumbsup:

a bad tradesman always blames his tools. The design of the malpassi has nothing wrong with it. The Application is always the reason it doesn't work the way it is supposed to.

I'm sure the people who have owned and correctly used the malpassi can guide you to a solution where this brand of regulator works perfectly, should you find another one lying around.

There are of course larger capacity regs in other brands if you need something that will flow a larger volume of fuel.

A friend of mine who was responsible for preparing the vehicle that took steven richards to his formula ford championship in the 90's in his team valvoline car swears everytime someone mentions malpassi.....they had numorous fail from new.......he also had one fail on an F3 car after 2 laps costing them the championship....after changing to bosch they never had a problem.....i have also had them fail myself......i guess either we are bad tradesmen,the quality control in malpassi is terrible or the product just plain old stinks

I've had heaps of different shops say bad things about Malpassi. One or two shops I can understand... but in reality... who cares?

Regulators are a coupla hundred at best.

Spend a little more on a good one.

I'm using a Nismo/Apex unit and it looks like it's a OEM JECS/Unisia part. It cost less than a Malpassi.

T.

Krone - most of the rb engines run rich when they are off of boost, but if you start to increase the boost they can get too lean, which is dangerous at that end of the rev range and when under load.

The other reason for using an aftermarket regulator is that the std injectors are at there limit at a little over 200rwkw, so the regulator allows you to push it a little further without the expence of new injectors ($800 - 1000 for RB25). If you wanted bigger rwkw >250 you should be considering injecrors, but if you are only pushing 220 then the regulator is cheap insurance for your motor.

So you are right in that it wont give you any more power, but it will give you more scope to tune the engine and a little bit of insurance against a blown motor.

Krone - most of the rb engines run rich when they are off of boost, but if you start to increase the boost they can get too lean, which is dangerous at that end of the rev range and when under load.

The other reason for using an aftermarket regulator is that the std injectors are at there limit at a little over 200rwkw, so the regulator allows you to push it a little further without the expence of new injectors ($800 - 1000 for RB25). If you wanted bigger rwkw >250 you should be considering injecrors, but if you are only pushing 220 then the regulator is cheap insurance for your motor.

So you are right in that it wont give you any more power, but it will give you more scope to tune the engine and a little bit of insurance against a blown motor.

Well ive always looked at it like a bandaid to a real problem anyway..

If you have a big fuel pump and bigger injectors than theres no need for a regulator

Well ive always looked at it like a bandaid to a real problem anyway..  

If you have a big fuel pump and bigger injectors than theres no need for a regulator

Mates car the injectors are too big, so yes the fpr is a bandaid, however in that case its to up the pressure so the injectors dont dribble. On lower pressures it wont idle properly.

He also has one on a lancer, as why get aftermarket injectors when all he needs is a bit more fuel pressure to handle some happy gas.

As mentioned there's no need for an aftermarket fuel reg unless you're running out of duty cycle with the existing injectors. Upping the fuel pressure a bit can make the difference for a marginal setup but always best to go bigger injectors and retune. A fuel reg will make no difference if the fuel pump isn't up to the task.

Another reason an aftermarket fuel reg is handy is use a twin-outlet regulator to split the fuel supply into a pairs of 3 cylinder supply lines. Sometimes the last injector in the series can get an inadequate supply of fuel.

Getting back to topic Malpassi regs are probably best to avoid if you're pushing fairly critical A/F ratios for max power. They vary pressure a bit depending on temp or whatever, I just know a few people that suffered from inconsistent fuel pressure and A/F ratios and the problem was solved with a Sard or SX fuel reg.

...Ben

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers. Skyline is back on the menu, can’t get rid of it. It’s like a child you don’t want, or herpes 
    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
×
×
  • Create New...