Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As above really

At the moment i have a pair of Greddy T517z's set at 1.4 bar

264in & 272out cams

Some half decent intake & exhaust bits

and a much improved recently rebuilt bottom end etc......(still 2.6)

So far it has recorded 530hp & 418ftIb @ the hubs

on a dynapack.

The T517z's are good for around 600 - 650hp max

Are their any low mounts that can flow a lot more than this?????

Ive been told by a turbo supplier in the UK that he could build me

a pair based on GT25 housings using T3 wheels that will flow enough for just over 400hp each...........if i can supply him with some accurate specs of what will work on an RB , as they specialise in 4 pot applications and have almost no knowledge of the RB.

Cheers in advance :)

Jay

As above really

At the moment i have a pair of Greddy T517z's set at 1.4 bar

264in & 272out cams

Some half decent intake & exhaust bits

and a much improved recently rebuilt bottom end etc......(still 2.6)

So far it has recorded 530hp & 418ftIb @ the hubs  

on a dynapack.

The T517z's are good for around 600 - 650hp max

Are their any low mounts that can flow a lot more than this?????

Ive been told by a turbo supplier in the UK that he could build me

a pair based on  GT25 housings using T3 wheels that will flow enough for just over 400hp each...........if i can supply him with some accurate specs of what will work on an RB , as they specialise in 4 pot applications and have almost no knowledge of the RB.

Cheers in advance  :thumbsup:  

Jay

Do you want higher max power or higher average power?

twin GT2871R's w/ .63 turbines?? maybe even the .86 if you can take the lag, but if you can take the lag get the twin GT3071R's, each good for 400+, uses the standard T25 turbine flange

GT3071RWg - 450hp

Based upon the same turbo as the HIGH flowing, larger framed GT3071R, but conveniently packaged into the same style turbine housing as the popular GT28Rs/GT2871R turbos. This turbo is uniquely configured with its own turbo wheel trim, turbine A/R, and compressor housing. Unlike, the GT28RS and GT2871R, this turbo now has a much larger compressor housing to support the much higher flowing 71mm compressor wheel. Comes with T25 style inlet flange.

Turbine

-Wheel: 56.5mm w/ 84 trim

-Housing: 0.64 a/r

-Internally Wastegated (No Actuator)

-Maps: Not Available

Compressor

-Wheel: 71mm w/ 56 trim

-Housing: .50 a/r

-Maps: Not Available  

-Inlet: 2.75"

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GRT

www.atpturbo.com - 3071R makign 400awhp on the 1.8 audi's

www.cheapturbo.com - garretts at great prices.

Contact Mark at Abbey Motor Sport he's probably got the best tuning shop for skylines in the UK if not Europe. They supply & tune.

Im familiar with Abbey , used them a couple of times , very knowledgable ,

and their facilities are very good......but they have in the past suggested that if you go bigger much than ive got (T517's / 2530's) then you need a capacity increase.

Im trying to find out if this is the case :P , as a 2.8 conv is WAY beyond my budget....

Do you want higher max power or higher average power?

I suppose , like everyone ..... i want both :)

But realistically , im looking for a peak @ hubs of about 650hp at a sensible (below 8000rpm) limit , without loosing TOO much power lower down.

At the moment ive got 400@hubs 5000rpm and 530@hubs at 7500rpm

Peak torque is 418@hubs at 5200rpm ,

it has very little lag and feels great on the road ,

which i like , as it's my everyday transport.

Is it a realistic target ????, i dont want to end up with a laggy ,

unresponsive car that i'll hate driving .....

twin GT2871R's w/ .63 turbines?? maybe even the .86 if you can take the lag, but if you can take the lag get the , each good for 400+, uses the standard T25 turbine flange

Sound's great ....... :) but do you know of anyone using any of these on a GTR ?

I'd like a good idea of how much lag i should expect ????

I think Cypher industries ( ive only read about their car in a magazine) MIGHT be using something like twin GT3071R's on their GTR but they are not too keen on telling everyone spec's.....

Thanks everyone for the replys so far.......

Jay

But realistically , im looking for a peak @ hubs of about 650hp at a sensible (below 8000rpm) limit , without loosing TOO much power lower down.

At the moment ive got 400@hubs 5000rpm and 530@hubs at 7500rpm

Peak torque is 418@hubs at 5200rpm ,

it has very little lag and feels great on the road ,

which i like , as it's my everyday transport.

I have HKS 2540's with HKS 280' cams returning 600hp at the hubs

GTR V

But realistically , im looking for a peak @ hubs of about 650hp at a sensible (below 8000rpm) limit , without loosing TOO much power lower down.

At the moment ive got 400@hubs 5000rpm and 530@hubs at 7500rpm

Peak torque is 418@hubs at 5200rpm ,  

it has very little lag and feels great on the road ,  

which i like , as it's my everyday transport.Jay

I have HKS 2540's with HKS 280' cams delivering good figures on a hub dyno

GTR V

I have HKS 2540's with HKS 280' cams delivering good figures on a hub dyno

GTR V

Hi GTRV, am I reading your graphs right? It looks like 190 rhhp at 5,000 rpm, that seems a long way short of Jay's current 400 rhhp at the same rpm. Peak torque at 6,781 rpm on yours doesn't compare too favourably with Jays at 5,200 rpm. That's a lot to give away for an extra 50 rhhp at the top end.

Hi Jay, personally I don't favour much bigger than 2530/N1/T517 size turbos on 2.6 litres. Not if you want to maintain decent response, anyway. That's why the RB30 bottom end is so attractive to us. With 3.1 litres we can run 2 full sizes larger turbos (or a big single) and have better response, higher average power and more max power. We make more power at 7,000 rpm with the 3.1 litre than the 2.6 litre makes at 8,500 rpm. With the 2.6 litres we find that we are chasing more and more rpm, which costs money and shortens life dramatically. Plus the gearing becomes unuseable when the rpm gets so high, we have to change diff ratios and that's not cheap either.

:)

Jay,

You've seen my car when it had low-mounted 48 trim GT2835s (still have the manifolds) and was 2.6l - once it was mapped it wasn't bad on the road. T618Zs must be the easiest route, and you haven't had the problems with your 517s everyone was talking about, or you could sell your bottom end and go RB30 like a few others are doing...

Phil

tomei arms b9046. 720ps, straight bolt on kit, most powerful low mounts on sale, the trust items mentioned above r not ball bearing if that concerns you.

if u wanna argue, buy GT-R magazine no.059 and email them with your concerns

Hi Jay, personally I don't favour much bigger than 2530/N1/T517 size turbos on 2.6 litres. Not if you want to maintain decent response, anyway. That's why the RB30 bottom end is so attractive to us. With 3.1 litres we can run 2 full sizes larger turbos (or a big single) and have better response, higher average power and more max power. We make more power at 7,000 rpm with the 3.1 litre than the 2.6 litre makes at 8,500 rpm. With the 2.6 litres we find that we are chasing more and more rpm, which costs money and shortens life dramatically. Plus the gearing becomes unuseable when the rpm gets so high, we have to change diff ratios and that's not cheap either.

Hi Sydneykid, Unfortunatly i cant afford to go bigger capacity yet.....thats gonna have to wait another 18months or so , you say you dont favour MUCH bigger than what i have , one of the reasons im considering changing is the 270* bearing on the T517z's is restricting the amount of boost i can safely run.....

so rather than just get them rebuilt with 360* jobbies i thought about going a teeny bit bigger :) with decent bearings........ like a pair of these ......... http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GRT

but i have the feeling they might fall into the "too big for 2.6" catagory , but not knowing a great deal about turbo characteristics , im a bit lost....

You've seen my car when it had low-mounted 48 trim GT2835s (still have the manifolds) and was 2.6l - once it was mapped it wasn't bad on the road. T618Zs must be the easiest route, and you haven't had the problems with your 517s everyone was talking about, or you could sell your bottom end and go RB30 like a few others are doing...

Hi Phil , hows it going ???? Can you send me ( PM me or Email [email protected] ) your dyno graph , while your at it , let me know whats happening with your car :rant: , if its not a secret :P

Jay

Hi Sydneykid, Unfortunatly i cant afford to go bigger capacity yet.....thats gonna have to wait another 18months or so , you say you dont favour MUCH bigger than what i have , one of the reasons im considering changing is the 270* bearing on the T517z's is restricting the amount of boost i can safely run.....  

so rather than just get them rebuilt with 360* jobbies i thought about going a teeny bit bigger  :( with decent bearings........ like a pair of these ......... http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GRT

but i have the feeling they might fall into the "too big for 2.6" catagory , but not knowing a great deal about turbo characteristics , im a bit lost....

 

Hi Phil , hows it going ???? Can you send me ( PM me or Email [email protected] ) your dyno graph , while your at it  , let me know whats happening with your car  :cheers:  , if its not a secret  :(  

Jay

Hi Jay, I strongly suggest you have a look at the T25 compressor map, that should help you decide if a pair is the right way to go for your purposes.:)

Thanks .... but i dont know what any of this means :confused:  :D  

The first one is the comp map for a GT25r

The second one is for the GT28RS

gt25rcompressormap.gif

gt28rscompressormap.gif

Hi JAY-R32, you realy need to know something about compressor maps or have complete trust in your turbo supplier, have discussed your requirements with them and agreed on the selection. If you want to select turbos yourself. buy them site unseen from people you have never met, then I strongly suggest you get a hold of one (or more) of the turbo books around. I prefer Corky Bell's books but there are others.

My comments on the 2 compressor maps you have attached;

* Personally I wouldn't touch the GT28RS, it has a very complex surge line between boost of 1.2 and 1.8 bar (pressure ratio 2.2 and 2.8). This is where your engine will mostly operate. At that boost, the power levels 145 bhp and 260 bhp (13 lbs per minute to 23 lbs per minute) are also very common transient power levels.

* In my opinion the GT25R simply doesn't produce enough airlfow to satisfy your requirements, its top airflow of 26 lbs will mean it won't make any more power than a 2530. The surge line is much more user friendly than the GT28RS and it does produce good airflow at low boost levels.

My suggestion is to keep looking, I don't think either compressor is suitable.:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...