Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my q to you is does ur car break traction on thirds??????

cause i noe i do :kick:

i think it will be more than 160rwkw cause thats all u said i can make on a T28, ur car makes 167rwkw and i made 158rwkw b4 the rebuild so noe i figure it would be more than 160rwkw

can you beat da EVo1 by the way cause i can!!!!!

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my q to you is does ur car break traction on thirds??????

cause i noe i do :kick:  

i think it will be more than 160rwkw cause thats all u said i can make on a T28, ur car makes 167rwkw  and i made 158rwkw b4 the rebuild so noe i figure it would be more than 160rwkw

can you beat da EVo1 by the way cause i can!!!!!

I reckon the bluey would probably spin 4th, I've been in it before when it was first built on 7psi and it was a wheel spining machine, and a 13 second car to boot

I like the skylines, but go the bluey

You were beaten fair and square.  

The sooner you accept that, the sooner you can build a bridge and get over it. :D

no that wasnt the question of this topic i was saying is there a chance that he can only have what was said that is the thread!!!!!! 4 all i noe he has more than claimed as i believe!

thanku

i know someone who owns an original fj20 with not ONE kilomtere on it. it is still sitting on an engine stand... mmmm fj20. dr30s rule. as do bluebirds.

yes................................................................... :Bang:

i know a guy with a 4G63 with 160,000 km on it...........................

well back to then original thread.....

my point being i think he had more than what i was lead to beleive

what makes you say that? is it because he had a shitty old FJ bluebird and you had a cool new skyline? as said befor he beat you fair and square get over it....

what makes you say that? is it because he had a shitty old FJ bluebird and you had a cool new skyline?  as said befor he beat you fair and square get over it....

datsun boy i think that is just uncalled for if u cant say nething nice dont say nething at all

thanku

my q to you is does ur car break traction on thirds??????

cause i noe i do :kick:  

i think it will be more than 160rwkw cause thats all u said i can make on a T28, ur car makes 167rwkw  and i made 158rwkw b4 the rebuild so noe i figure it would be more than 160rwkw

can you beat da EVo1 by the way cause i can!!!!!

when moving in a straight line, boot to the floor in 2nd, it will wheelspin from around 3k RPM onwards....come off the clutch a little to quick into 3rd and its wheelspin again to redline....come off the clutch hard into 4th and it wheelspins for a bit, then the roadspeed catches the wheelspeed.

it also sits on the brake in 2nd at 1500rpm quite happily :P

peak power is not the way to make a fast car....just a dyno queen....

i think you need to close your wallet and do some research.....

no that wasnt the question of this topic i was saying is there a chance that he can only have what was said that is the  thread!!!!!! 4 all i noe he has more than claimed as i believe!

thanku

/

Just to be different. RB20 non turbo. 185kws tripple webers. Thats a motor

I see you still haven't gotten over the fact that a car that probably cost less than $10000 to build kicked your arse.

thats alright see iam not fussed cause girls like skylines, and i can still beat bogans in V8's thats good enough 4 me!!!!

actually read the origanal thread i think that goes to most ppls here

dude have some common sense, you could spend endless amounts of dollars on a rebuild, its not gonna make it much, if any quicker.. your engine was probably fuct b4.

lighter car, lighter smaller engine... less pistons too turn over, less inertia...

consider this, they are the same ruff capacity (.2 woohoo) the bore and stroke of the FJ20 is going to be far closer to square, it can rev all day, it has a physically bigger turbo, and they are tuffaz nuts.

and thats comming from someone who owns an RB engine.

do yourself a favour either buy a bigger turbo and get a dyno tune, buy a turbo bluebird.. OR STFU!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...