Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tried to search for this as im sure it would have come up before, but have you ever tried typing 'tail lights' in a search on these forums?

Anyways i've noticed a couple of R33 skylines that seems to have a differnt brake light sequence to my own, just wondering if this is a modification or perhaps a standard on differnt model 33's.

My sequence involves,

Headlights on = all 4 hot plates on.

Braking = 4 hot plates on and spolier light on.

Alternative sequence,

Headlights on = 2 Outer most hotplates on.

Braking = 2 Inner most hotplates on + Spolier light.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/59323-alternative-braketail-light-sequence/
Share on other sites

I have mine,

4 hot plates for when the lights are on

Both the outter ones for braking and the spoiler.

You dont have to be a guiness to do this. All i did was cover one of the electrodes (one is for normal light and the other is for brake. My ones have the brake one covered) of the inner lights (on the light globes) with electrical tape in order that it wont light up when you push the brakes. Thats it

You can make it as shifty as you want.

I simply cut the wire powering the inner tail light (at the tail lamp assembly). So I have:

Headlights + 2 hotplates

4 brake lights

So, at night I get 2 fresh lights come on when I brake (don't have one of those ridiculous "eye-level" brake lights).

hmmm, cut or simply put electrical tape...

i think i know which one is more practical, in a way that u can change the sequence when you like to. Instead of cutting then you decide you dont like it anymore and have to solder the wires back together...

yea its easy but ive actually gott make the effort to do it lol

forget the orange lense like i could be bothered changing it ill just leave it red

or i can make the current indicator the reverse light as well as being the indicator.

either way the problem isnt the lights its covering the hole where the old revrse lights are meant to be (either side of the number plate). i would get a genuine aussie spec rear bar but i didnt have time to order it before i painted the car and ill never be able to match the colour so im gonnahave to get some thing made up maybe out of CF or something

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...