Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Over the last half century the NSW population has doubled, the number of licences has increased sevenfold and the number of vehicles in 2003 is more than nine times that for 1949.

Well how about that, that's what should be in the news, why don't they ever report the good bits?

i think the thread has gone a bit off topic ... we want to stop P platers making news in the paper ... dont' care about the oldies ... nothing you can do about them LOL ... they'll tell the law makers off ...

something needs to be done about the little shits ... i think maybe very strict rules ... very harsh penalties for infringments ...

i know... dont watch the news.. and ban a current affiar

problem sloved..

dont know if penaltys will do anything the whole problem in the first place is cause we do this shit without any thought.. and i havnt fully checked the stats but i dont think its any worse than before..

im fully over any media report or hot story about p plate driving, unless it doubles in the next six months forget about it... put the money into driver traning and pay some people to think up an affective strategy if we want to make a difference - revise the licenscing system.

the penatlys are harsh enough at the moment you can loose your licence on your p's for just waking up in the bloody morning - 2 points just for not having ps on the car... on green ps u get 7 points and in double demerit time u pass a truck at 120 move on the overtaking section drivin the pac highway home and the feds would have your licence and be all singin.... naaahh naaah. naah nah nah naaahhh sayyyy aaaa goodbye... as you walk your bitch ass home for christmas

"the fatality rate for 17-20 yearolds was 3 times the fatality rate for the entire population"

that was in the Qld report..................MAYBE THAT'S WHY THEY'RE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT P-PLATERS

Revhead had a good comment on how it dosent take driver/passanger deaths into account but i think that just strengthens the argument for restricting the number of passengers in a car on p's...........

.................actually i read further down the report, it breaks up who got killed. drivers, passangers, pedestrians etc.........more passangers than drivers

another interesting note is that most of the accidents happened on saturday night, which has the highest rate of fatalties and 6-11pm the time when they occured the most. 2nd was 12-5am...............

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/NSW-fa...4344933013.html

For once we don't get a mention! lol

Although they don't bash these people as much as they would have if it was another skyline driver.

That's cause that's the SMH, and not the Daily Telegraph

They're just interested in selling papers and don't care about the news or consequences.

Not only do printing front page storys like they were doing(guess they found something better, they go in crazes, p platers, shark attack, sydney to hobart, very late reporting of the tsunami(I work in a newsagents)) to attract the attention of the oldies to say, "oh bad young skyline drivers" but also, to grab people like our attention, get us pissed off, and end up reading the article to see how much they bag you, sucks but it worked on me.

They mention 3 incidents with fatalities, 2 involve skylines and one a 'sports car'. As mentioned before people can and will speed in whatever they are driving if thats what they want to do. What about all the fatalities from road accidents in everyday cars, like commodores, falcons, magnas etc. Why dont they have some sort of statistics in the paper of fatal accidents alongside car type. It's hard enough for us to take our 'lines for a drive now without being watched, followed or spot checked by the police.

There are as many idiots out there in gemini's and excels causing havoc on the streets...and just as easy to speed in them. Just takes a bit longer to get there, but they can all exceed 150km/h

.................actually i read further down the report, it breaks up who got killed.  drivers, passangers, pedestrians etc.........more passangers than drivers

another interesting note is that most of the accidents happened on saturday night, which has the highest rate of fatalties and 6-11pm the time when they occured the most.  2nd was 12-5am...............

every state has a road or 2 where if you go for a drive on a friday or sat night u will see some stupidly rediculous cars and stupidly rediculous driving by P platers ... now its always made me wonder why cops dont' concentrate on these roads at these particular times?? sometimes i see cops ... but i always see dickheads going at 100+ in a 60 zone ... and they never ever get caught ... everytime i see it without fail ... thats what pisses me off the most ... the last time i saw a cop pull someone over at that time and place was a 200sx and he wasn't even doing anything ...

All the hype abt skylines is becos there is a general impression against these cars.

If you guys want to effect a change, form an offical lobby group and go public. Guns kill the most pple in the US every year but it will never be outlawed....why? becos the gun lobby groups are strong and have a significiant presence

LOL, dude ive done 170 on my 1989 holden barina 1L engin, (well just 1s around 3 in the morning, no cars nuthing).

and yeah its just that modified cars stands out from all the other normal cars. (totaly agrees with REPRAZENT)

and the media!!! URGH. its funny whn some thing like this happns, the always point it out "a nissan Skyline", ive heard so many other accidents on TV, not involing skylines. and they allways say "a sedan" or "a car with xx people" or "the mortor vehical"... its funny how they always clearly say "a skyline" or a "wrx"...

oh and yeah. its stupid the speed, i mean big time ( i had my share of this and ive learnd my lesson)

I know of an accident where the vehicle was an HSV clubsport (a couple of years ago) where 2 people were killed, and the media just said a high performance vehicle. No mention at all of the vehicle type. It really pisses me off at the attention us 'line owners receive when a 'high performance' car is involved in road deaths! Like a couple of months back with the twin turbo IS200 conversion accident when 2 people where killed. I know people that knew the owner, and that accident caused us 'high performance import' owners so much grief.

If you look at the latest HSV, FPR products, they produce in stock for more horsepower than any import does (in stock form) and yet there is no uprising against that at all. I know of a ford performance guy, that owned a ftr T50 that made over 600 horses. There is such a negative image of 'grey imports'. It really shits me!!!!

i think the thread has gone a bit off topic ... we want to stop P platers making news in the paper ... dont' care about the oldies ... nothing you can do about them LOL ... they'll tell the law makers off ...  

something needs to be done about the little shits ... i think maybe very strict rules ... very harsh penalties for infringments ...

Quote " Something needs to be done about the little shits".....

Again i'm going to have to pause and try my best to work out what the f8ck your smoking!

Are you telling me you were never a P Plater?

Or is it that you have never broken any road rule? (Caught or not)

Do you own a HPI?

Im trying my best to work out how anything you have said is constructive! What is your solution? Harsh penalties??? Like what? And does this mean that once your finished on your P's that the penalties should be any less? How is that fair? So if your 35 and you get caught doing 150 down the highway you should be punished less than the 18 year old you were racing???

The "L" and "P" plate system is supposed to be a way of introducing new drivers on to the road! Now your saying that because you have finished your introduction that all those who havent are just stupid "little shits"? So when can I expect my "Graduated from being a little shit" membership card in the mail? I finsh my third year on my P's in a couple of months! Guess what: I have never lost my license! I have never been booked in my Skyline! In fact my biggest ticket was for not signaling, I was driving a 91 Civic! The biggest accident I have ever had was in a commodore and that was when I cliped a gutter at a low speed!

So please let me join! I dont want to be a "little shit" anymore.............

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...