Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by meggala

if you are going for a mga  big torbo and heaps of power yes other wise the stock one is good for 450 hp or so is that enough

meggala

later on down the track there's possibility for a larger turbo, but for now im deciding against because i do want to retain bottom end...so you believe the plenum wont make that much of a difference to response over the "full" piping and OEM plenum?

please elaborate!

what does a Greddy one do that a fabricated one can't do? i mean Greddy is essentially a fabricated item anyway?

i spoke to mark at hills motorsport about inlet plenums and wether or not each of the injectors will be fed the same amount of air (which i believe is the main issue?) and he's very confident he's looked at that and addressed it...?

Provided the custom one is constructed in a way that it is tapered down towards the back there is no problem with air distribution as the throttle body does not feed directly towards any runners giving them more air.

I did not notice any extra lag when i fitted my front mount with the long crossover pipe.

the main issues with the other custom pleniums is the cars idle very badly. there is no inlet for the breather pipes from the rockers ( which doesn't conform to the epa. and they are alot of money for little gain. most people I have heard who fitted a custom plenium have had to go to custom ecu which in it self is not always legal. I have seen plenty of skylines make 250+ rwkw with the stock plenium. so why change unless as I said you want an all out race car.

btw if you can show me skyline with a custom plenium running the stock ecu and running well with cold start etc. I would be interested.

btw mat lowth on these forums is making 270 rwkw + with the standard plenium and probably more .

you car is fairly new and must drive beautifuly why ruin that if the are no major gains to be had.

meggala

Originally posted by meggala

if you are going for a mga  big torbo and heaps of power yes other wise the stock one is good for 450 hp or so is that enough

meggala

Thats true, iv heard something in the vincinity of 500hp+ you would only see a difference with custom plenum.

Frank, iv actually thought of this b4 and went to investigate it further. I was in the same position as you, installing a new fmic and wanted to get custom plenum only coz it was so much neater.

There are only really gains to be had (maybe even none) by having this custom plenum.

Its just 2 expensive and won't justify the $=hp improvement.

If your fussed your beta off just getting the intercooler pipes HPC treated to repel heat of something.

conclusion

Don't waste money on custom plenum, not worth it.

actually, i can shed a bit of light on this thread, i've used both custom and modified stock plenum. the modified stocko is the better of the 2 , but it does requires lots of grinding work withing the plenum for correct air deflection vanes, where as the custom was an absolute heap of shit. but then the g reddy one looks the wrks tough, and as for response time, it beats the stock pipe over settup hands down and this is with a big fmic. i got pics if anyone wants to look just pm me.

Re: the idle - That's spot on - that's because they no longer use the idle control component... Cold start is no good either...

re: my car - as you said - it's made 316rwkw @ 14psi as of last week, and still running the crossover plenum - so there is definitely better mods to do before you consider the plenum.

matt

Originally posted by meggala

the main issues with the other custom pleniums is the cars idle very badly. there is no inlet for the breather pipes from the rockers ( which doesn't conform to the epa. and they are alot of money for little gain. most people I have heard who fitted a custom plenium have had to go to custom ecu which in it self is not always legal. I have seen plenty of skylines make 250+ rwkw with the stock plenium. so why change unless as I said you want an all out race car.  

btw if you can show me skyline with a custom plenium running the stock ecu and running well with cold start etc. I would be interested.  

btw mat lowth on these forums is making 270 rwkw + with the standard plenium and probably more .  

you car is fairly new and must drive beautifuly why ruin that if the are no major gains to be had.  

meggala

Originally posted by matlowth

Re: the idle - That's spot on - that's because they no longer use the idle control component... Cold start is no good either...

re: my car - as you said - it's made 316rwkw @ 14psi as of last week, and still running the crossover plenum - so there is definitely better mods to do before you consider the plenum.

matt

Damn Matt u r a sicko! so i guess that new T76 is working well to get over 300rwkw at only 14psi!:eek1:

The greedy ones have been flow test to make sure each cyclinder gets the same amount of air thats where the $$$ goes.

I think a greddy plenum and Q45 throttle body are about $1800-2000 ask Andrew i think he still has one ??

I don't know how much performance its going to give you but god dam does it make your engine bay look good :)

in regards to the idle control component, from memory, hills were saying they do retain it - now wether i was misinformed, heard incorrectly or not knowing what im talking about is another story :D is it impossible to retain the idle control component on a custom plenum?

the message is very clear in what your saying. and that is, plenums are only beneficial with big HP and could, in some cases, cause more problems than anything.

i guess the answer i was looking for was wether or not the crossover piping is insignificant in terms of response. from the comments here it seems as though it isnt that bad....but i guess its just an age old thought that the additional piping is going to be significant...

I brought this up again at Hills today and they insist that it is a good mod. Maybe it is OK with the Hills Stage 1+2 upgrades ???

Mark doesn't usually put his goolies on the line like that without something to back it up......

:cool: Sure is! No more laggy either! :)

U coming this sunday?

matt

Originally posted by INASNT

Damn Matt u r a sicko! so i guess that new T76 is working well to get over 300rwkw at only 14psi!:eek1:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes correct. Also, I'd avoid applying it to soft paint (however I doubt you'll ever have to deal with it in practice). So any paint that hasn't fully hardened, could be a 1k paint that never fully hardened or it could be a 2k paint that was laid down thick and hasn't yet fully hardened. 
    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
×
×
  • Create New...