Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

read this the other day in "Drive", thought it was quite good, for those who missed it, should be interesting reading...

____________________________________________________

Can consumers look to this weekend's Bathurst 24 Hours as a guide to the reliability of showroom cars? Not quite.

V8 Supercar racer John Bowe is angry that a field of production-based cars contesting the Bathurst 24-hour race this weekend has to deal with a 7.0-litre Holden Monaro sports sedan (pictured), a car he claims is "way, way outside the spirit of the rules".

"The Monaro should win by miles," says Bowe, who will drive a $750,000 Ferrari 360GT in the first of what is expected to become an annual event on the calendar.

"Apart from the shell, there is not a single thing on that car that relates to the original Monaro," insists Bowe, who lists a 7.0-litre Corvette engine from a Le Mans racer, Holinger six-speed sequential gearbox, Ford differential and specially fabricated front and rear suspension.

"The road-car suspension has been scrapped in favour of a unique double-wishbone racing rear-end design manufactured by Harrop Engineering -- it's more a Harrop car than a Holden," says Bowe, who, we should point out, also works for Holden's arch rival Ford developing performance road cars.

"It has more power than a V8 supercar ... if it's not 10 seconds faster than the rest, it's a joke."

Bowe says he doesn't blame Holden for grabbing the opportunity to give the Monaro an image boost but wonders whether the punters will be fooled into believing that "this $1 million creation is really a $60,000 Monaro".

Bowe says that Procar, the organising body behind the 24-hour race, has bent over backwards to attract the Monaro beast into the event.

"It's wrong, but we're not taking our cricket bat home," he says. "We're going to Mount Panorama to do our best with a production-based car that meets the FIA regulations."

The controversy over the Monaro "sports sedan" has dominated discussions in the weeks leading into the inaugural Bathurst 24 Hours, which has attracted international teams to Australia.

Most of the cars competing for outright honours are limited-edition competition versions such as the Ferrari 360GT and Porsche 911 GT3 RS. A dark horse is the American-built Mosler, entered by a British team. It's a very low-volume 1100kg street racer with a reported 420kW on tap.

Consumers seeking a guide to the reliability and pace of more affordable near-stock models will need to look further back in the field to the likes of Ford Falcons, Holden Commodores, Mitsubishi Evos, BMW M3s, Subaru WRX Stis, and Toyota MR2s, along with a lone Nissan 350Z.

Factory-entered cars are rare, which is surprising, given what appears to be a great opportunity for manufacturers to establish a car's sporting credentials and score some serious backyard barbecue cred.

Returning Australian international David Brabham, who is racing a Porsche GT3 RS, confirmed the race promises to be no walk in the park.

"Mount Panorama has got to be one of the toughest circuits anywhere -- it's a brutal place on car and driver," said the veteran of 16 previous 24-hour races in places like Spa, Daytona and Le Mans.

____________________________________________________

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6140-its-the-harrop-monaro/
Share on other sites

Ahh well, the Monaro won, I guess I will have to eat my words about it. All points on unfairness aside, it is a very good effort from any team that has a car that lasts the whole 24 hours, more so if it is the first offical race.

However the Germany cars Ie BMW where very very competitive.

Ohhh well I will cough it up. Congrats to Holden, HRT, Harrops etc.

Still if only they allowed my dad's uncle's brother in-law with his 541 1/3 chevy small block 12 cyc v8. It would totally kick butt, cause like it has turbo factory rotary headers and does 11's on the track :D

Also how sweet was the mosler. definitely a tough machine.

That Mosler was a nice looking car, but it wasn't tough enough - run without a clutch for the last 18 hours or so - accoring to the clowns/comentators on channel 7 they were only using 3,4,5 for the that time - must have plenty of torque for a race engine to pull out of the pits in 3rd!

Go the Mirages!

I didn't realise the mirages were from japan, I assumed they were from the lcoal Mirage series.

Those things are weapons, they have the 2l 6cy from the FTO with about 150kw in a nice, light car.

the monaro is bullshit

like u can buy anything like that for 60k from holden

the rest were based on factory cars, even some of the z3 m coupe things had stock quiet exhuasts and they were doing well.

the s2000 with neons was a bit fast and furious hehehe.

let me tell u up the top of the mountain in the bush with no lights freezing my nuts off was a interesting experience but the view and the car sounds were awesome i loved the silver/purple porsche and the yellow porsche had some major issues it sounded like a truck.

the mosler thing was very nice and his driving line made me think he was on rails cause no matter where he entered the corner he could just go soo tight around it, the ferarri had a motorbike under the hood hahhaah sooo awesome i think i might buy 2

and they swapped an engine from what i know cause it blew one 4 hours into it or something but hitting rev limiter on gear changes constantly wouldnt have been helping.

was a good day out there but the hype and shit about the monaro is all crap.

it did go well and pulled out of corners quick but for the amount of mods it has u would want it too, the ferarri looked better around corners so smooth like it wasnt trying

and that magna with the huge fully sick wing, was it v8? it sounded like no magna i have heard hahaha.

anyway my 2c

Yes, the magna was a v8 from the "Future Tourer" category. It's a shame bugger all night racing was shown on TV, would have been VERY interesting for the drivers with such a discrepancy in speeds.

thought it was that magna hehehe the 350z sounded ok hehehe went alright for a na too

was funny the mr2s struggling i was right near the first one when it kissed the wall and then over near the mean sounding porsche when it went nuts in the sand hehehe come to think of it there wasnt one spot of the track i wasnt at , at any one time hehee.

food was shit, no good looking scenery :) but there wasnt many holden ford yobbos

hey i watched this on optus sports, didnt' realise what it was :)

but the race i watched was some 2hr endurance showroom showdown. had rx7's, evo's, s15's etc. rx7 lead for a while but had problems halfway and the s15 took the lead, looked like it was gonna win and in the last 5mins sounded like it was running on 3 cylinders and got taken by the evo 6 and evo 7 and came 3rd. had an sti competing as well, he was doing pretty well too, i think they said he had no 3rd gear!

Originally posted by INASNT

From the 4 hrs of footage they showed on channel 7 it didnt look like there were many spectators there!

From all report i've heard you could spectate from virtually any position you picked... and it was heaven for those who were there!

Im pretty excited over the potential of this event, and as I've said I hope to see alot more variety next year, with Holden throwing down the gauntlet. Cars like the Monaro 427 are ground breakers and I think they have potential to start a new catagory of racing. Its what we all want to see, 427Monaro, V8 RWD Magna!, the Mosler, and hopefully next year more manufacturers will take to the event with their own vehicle... maybe someone will enter a GTR :)

Originally posted by _turtle_

hey i watched this on optus sports, didnt' realise what it was :)  

but the race i watched was some 2hr endurance showroom showdown.  had rx7's, evo's, s15's etc.  rx7 lead for a while but had problems halfway and the s15 took the lead, looked like it was gonna win and in the last 5mins sounded like it was running on 3 cylinders and got taken by the evo 6 and evo 7 and came 3rd.  had an sti competing as well, he was doing pretty well too, i think they said he had no 3rd gear!

yeah i saw that on inside speed 2.

that race was just before the main 24hr race. And some of the cars that raced in that race, raced in the 24hr race 2 i think.

hmmmm

yeah i agree people who were there were lucky it wasnt packed, there were people parked there on the side of the track watching the race from the comfort of their car hehehe like a nice black 911 turbo sitting on the corner of conrod and the main straight watching tv in his car and watching the race hehehe.

and the turbos at night boy did they show their stuff all u could hear was boost in that cold air i would have been going nuts too,

the potential for this event is huge ill be there next year for sure. even though it was dusty and stinking hot heheh and did the old skool bushwalks to find better spots ehehhe.

cant beat the discs glowing at night either the monaro and the stock e46 m3 had bright discs none of the porsches glowed or the mosler (beast)

its a shame that lamborghini didnt even enter and viper/supra/nsx backed out.

but the ferarri made up for it. there was a viper sitting outside which i took heaps of pics of, it was with a sh*tload of chargers hehehe.

and the ute muster that was supposed to be huge had about 7 utes hehehe

think it was more to do with poor advertising, low funding and not alot of people signing up to race.

procar forums tell u the story

I helped prepare one of the mirages for the race and am good friends with peter leehmuis one of the racers, he was comin 11th then one of the porsches ran into him. The cars are just the mirage cup cars they are a jap spec cyborg r mirage decked out with rally art goodies they arent like anything you can by here in fact they are 4 secs faster around wakefield then the v8 brute utes hahhaa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
×
×
  • Create New...