Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After some of the stupid little shitfights in SDU, and even the big serious fights/disagreements/bloody whatever, im going to set up a list of people who will act as mediators, either online or in person. This will be to sort out anything that needs sorting out. It will happen so we might as well have provisions to deal with it. Probably wont be needed for some little thing between 2 people in a thread though (i hope!)

anyone want to put their hand up? we obviously wont need many.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/618-mediators/
Share on other sites

i think it's up to the moderators and admin to take care of stuff like that. if we acknowledge mediators too we might have too many chiefs and not enough indians. there might be toes stepped on and so forth.

why don't you guys give us good reasons vs bad ones on why we should/shouldn't have mediators and we'll implement it if it's viable.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/618-mediators/#findComment-14484
Share on other sites

A mediator is like a middle man, say two people get into a stupid fight, they bring someone in (a mediator) to let the two sort things out and keeping things resonable and civil. Not a bad idea, hopefully things won't get to the point where we need any, but i personally don't think officially recognising anyone as a mediator is neccessary. If things happen, there are enough senior members around to hopefully step in and settle things down anyway. To me a moderator is to keep things on the board running smooth, now even though this board is a big part of the club, i think there's a lot more too it and mods aren't always gunna be able or suitable to mediate between people, either in person or online.

I think we just have to take things as they come, and hope everyone is mature enough to sort things out. I havn't seen any real arguements on here yet that have gotten out of hand and think we keep this trend going.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/618-mediators/#findComment-14617
Share on other sites

boxcar racer.. even though the idea of ppl fighting on these forums sounds stupid it happens alot and will happen as more and more ppl join up..

i dont agree on the idea of mediator's, as onarun said u cant have 101 and chiefs and no indians.. just have each section moderated by the assigned person as was in the previous forums..

if 2 or more ppl wanna bitch they can do it over email/icq or whatever..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/618-mediators/#findComment-14976
Share on other sites

just wanted to put something in place to sort out what will inevitably happen, especially between a moderator and user.

didnt think there were any cons. just trying to ensure the club doesnt go downhill as SDU did. Each state can just sort out what they want to do anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/618-mediators/#findComment-17812
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...