Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm changing my gf's coolant this weekend.

It's very rusty and sludgy so I got a bottle of radiator cleaner. You add it to the coolant, run engine for 20 min, drain the coolant and then it says to flush the system.

How do I flush the coolant system?

I've been reading that reverse flushing the system is the way to go - so do i just stick the hose up the drain plug and crank up the pressure or what?

Thanks guys

Greg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62427-changing-coolant-and-flushing-system/
Share on other sites

I saw its best to disconnect the top pipe, have the engine running at idle, and just fill the radiator with the garden hose at the same rate that it empties. When the water coming out turns clear its done. Let the radiator empty a little so theres space for the coolant.

I wonder how UAS do a flush? I read on their site that they only use demineralised water, dosent come from the tap :cheers:

On the side of the block there is a plug to drain the water from the water jackets around the cylinders, dont know if people actually do this or they just do similar to what you have mentioned. In the work shop manual it recomends to undo the plug to let the water drain from there as well as from the radiator hoses.

  • 2 months later...

Another way would be to remove the the Thermo housing (and while its out test the Thermo) and run the pressurised water into the radiator and through the engine. If you have access to an air compressor you could flush out the water after with the air, then reconnect everything (you will need to use a silicone gasket to reseal the thermo housing) and refil with appropriate water and collant.

Cheers

To remove gunk from radiator, it is obviously best to reverse the water flow through it! Normally, the water flows from top to bottom. If you remove the radiator cap, and the bottom hose, and use a garden hose from the bottom [preferably sealed as much as possible - wrap a rag or something around it.., it will remove UPWARDS that which has lodged in tubes from above.

The thermostat will stop flow to other parts, so that this will concentrate on cleaning rad. Then use other suggestions to flush out block,etc. Think about where the flow is going when you're doing these things, so that you don't dislodge rubbish from,say, block,and deposit it in radiator.

Remember that larger pieces may be dislodged than can't pass thru radiator tubes, so you can actually make it worse, if you're not thinking.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...