Jump to content
SAU Community

Automatic Transmission Shift Kit. - Updated Oct 2006


Recommended Posts

HAHAHAHA yeah that seems about right. What I did was put a drop sheet on the floor and had about 6 saturday papers spread outso it was nice and thick to absorb anything. Nothing to stop it dripping and running down your arms though.

I ended up using 7.5 - 8 liters of HiTemp.

Adam - I have a full unopened canister left over so if you decide to go with HiTemp you can do me a favour and get it of me. :P Let me know.

I've got about 3/4 of one left over from last time. How many litres are in a container again? I know it's measured in Gallons but I can't remember how many of them either.

Also waiting to decide about Racing ATF. Might mix them. I know you can do this.

At any rate, I may just help you out ned. Will let you know in the next week.

haha yer i got fluid ALL over me and the garage floor :D

i just used 2 skyline jacks on wood with a hydraulic jack on the diff to raise the car prob 50cm off the ground

its not that hard to do if you got a good brain :(

haha yer i got fluid ALL over me and the garage floor :(

i just used 2 skyline jacks on wood with a hydraulic jack on the diff to raise the car prob 50cm off the ground

its not that hard to do if you got a good brain :(

needless to say... i dont have a good brain

Wow. Mine looks quite different to yours but I guess that in terms of unbolting things it's similar. Most of my photos turned out crap. Either too much light or not enough. Very annoying.

This is the only decent one I got and it's of the top of the valvebody so you can't really tell the differences I'm talking about.

It looks like the scene of a murder.

Well I'll never know exactly what the vb will have given me because I am putting in a new turbo at the same time. If I could have I would have done them separately.

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok the kit is in and it works fine.

Basically the bolts you need to remove to get the thing out are all around the outside. If you look up near the gear shift lever mechanism you'll see that there are about 3 that don't need to be removed.

Also, you'll need to remove the sensors and stuff which I think will take care of the few bolts that are not around the outside that hold it up.

Mike told me there were about 7 bolts holding it up but there are more like about 15-20.

The welsh plugs that you put in go in the middle two holes of the four. I sanded them ever so lightly with 1200 grit sandpaper because I couldn't for the life of me get them in otherwise.

Three springs come out but only one goes back in. It's the lightest (ie easiest to compress).

I needed the jack to compress the spring enough to get the valvebody back in.

Use some longer bolts in the shorter bolt holes to get some bite and get at least 4 or 5 in before you start ratchetting them up because you don't want to strip threads.

I wrote down a little map with the numbers that are on the bolts on it but that didn't take into consideration the fact that there are 3 different lengths of the ones labelled '7'.

It's not a big drama in the end which bolts you use because when you have most of them in you can tell that some are too long so you swap it with others one by one.

Overall it was very time consuming because there are shitloads of bolts and they are many different lengths.

Ok how does it drive?

It is less likely to creep forward if you let off the brake at idle. More likely to roll backwards a little down a hill without brake.

1st to 2nd jumps in quite firmly now. Noticeable but not uncomfortable at low speeds. I am yet to redline it to see if it chirps but been close although I have semi slicks on at the moment. This is the most improved area I think.

2nd to 3rd firmer but still fairly smooth. Not as firm as 1st to 2nd.

3rd to 2nd, very firm.

3rd to 4th, much better at high speed, no firmness but still quicker at street speeds. Changing from 3rd to 4th at about 180km/h it securely and immediately went into gear whereas before it would take almost 2 seconds to slide in.

  • 2 weeks later...

I dont get chirping, and damn well i shouldnt with full handling and camber kit plus falken semi slicks

from first to second does straife the tail out in a straight line if running higher boost and from standing start

although after having my car tuned i took the exhaust from the frontpipe back off for some testing and gasket replacement and wow was it fast! Flooring it in 2nd going about 60, car just kicks back and powerslides for about 15m

so i currently have the entire exhaust off for a revamp :rofl:

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...