Jump to content
SAU Community

Automatic Transmission Shift Kit. - Updated Oct 2006


Recommended Posts

about 230rwkw. I think it broke gradually. It's been flaring 1st to 2nd for ages and as my power has gone up it's got worse. Also I've been to heaps of track days and overheated it once.

i do have a cooler for it.

I am going to get M V Automatics to rebuild it nice and tough. It will be much stronger when I get it back and should be shifting gears like a mother****er.

And we all know how good that is.

hi guys

i work for mike at mv automatics in adelaide

i am his apprentic and have been their for over 2 years now

i my self have just brought a r33 skyline

auto of coruse

just shift kitted it and its killer.

mike has been doing these kits for a long time

i my self think its a must for all you auto drives out their

i have driven many car making good power but have had shit shifts.

after fitting a shift kit different car a must for people making half diecent power.

the shift kit inproves the shift all thought the gears

also it is controlled but throttel

eg.the more you are on the throttle the harder the shifts gets

so at light throttel a great clean shift and at full throttel normally cherps.

also their are diffent stages we can go to sut your combo

eg.stage 1 satge 1.5 etc

hope this help you guys out.

if you would like to know more i will be happy to help you with

go the autos

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys, I am hoping you can help me out here. I am in the UK and bought one of the VB's from MV.

My mechanic was installing the new VB and, got the welsh plugs in ok, but, when he came to swap over the 4 solenoids he found that the old and new VB's do not match up and I am stuck, looking at the 2 pictures can you tell me what the problem may be?.

FYI the gearbox is not the one off my car, I bought it as a spare, and it definately came off an RB25 Engine.

Any help would be greatly appreciated,

Cheers,

Jake.

Pic on the left is of the old VB, the new VB is the pic on the right

Hi Jake

I spoke to Mike at MV automstics today, but it seems you beat me to it.

(for the benifit of other mambers on the forums) He tells me you have basically got an R34 box (they put these in the last of the R33's) and that he has/will fix things up for you.

Let me know how things go

Guy.

Cheers guys, I do appreciate your help. I did speak to Mike yesterday, what a genuinely nice guy, very helpful, plan is to now install the VB tonight on the gearbox that is currently in my R33 which is an RE4R01A, will post up the results later tonight :D

Jake

.......and damn was it worth it .

Very very messy job to do, lots of things that can go wrong, but, the end result is an autobox that just does not slip between gearchanges, 1st to 2nd goes in with a bang and a thud, 2nd to 3rd the same, 3rd to 4th not so bad, the changes are lightning fast and, I have just had the pleasure of breaking the rears loose on the 2-3 change up, jeseus christ I love this shift kit :)

BTW, did anybody else reset their ECU after installing the VB, I did have 1 slight issue with the box sticking in 2nd and bouncing off the limiter without a change up, but, this could have been boost related (too high), then again, it could be the car just learnng the new shift patterns too.

All in all, very, very pleased with it :D

on a non shift kit related matter; i blew reverse

dont ask me how cos i dont know, it drops in revs like its in gear, but wont actually put any drive to the wheels no matter what revs :confused:

but got another gearbox sitting here anyways :uh-huh:

guess ill be putting the shift kit in twice

Is anybody else having an intermittent issue with the box not changing up after a hard kickdown?, I have had a couple of moments when it will kick down a gear or two then just bounce off the limiter and not change up?, it is fine when driving "normally" ;)

I havent heard of this problem with anyone else. I am not sure but could the problem be the kick down sensor? it may be forcing the auto down a gear when it shouldnt, and hence holding it down.

there is a compisit belt made out of kevlar and something else wich initates the drive of the gear box when it slips excesively it ither needs to be replaced or tightend

ps. dont open the cover of your auto and start tightining things the belt is set to a certian NM of presure leave it to a pro

  • 2 weeks later...

Oh bloody hell i'm pissed off after all that trouble installing it, i put the car in d and it goes no where, basically wont engage in any gear. If anyone thats done it them self can give me some answers to where they put certain things that would be great because i can't call mike up until tommorrow. The two centre circles get plugged up with wesh plugs, 2 of those springs are removed and not used. The skinny long (softest) spring is placed in the hole closest to the engine. Heres wherei could have possibly been wrong, did u goes place that spring in the hole closest to engine or closest to tailshaft. Apart from that there was probly 1 left over screw but i think that was because it was already on the new vb. Any way would be great if someone can reply to the post other wise i'll find out tommorrow from mike and let you know how i go.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...