Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks.

Which one/s have the little circle indicators in the front bar, as i've heard thats only Series II but also recently seen a 94 with them.

Also when the windows are down and the doors open is the whole doorframe visable or just the bottom half cause i love that look.

Cheers.:cool:

Round lights is only a series 2, and a 94 couldn't have them - he must have done an after market job. Only late 95s (series 1.5s) and 96 onwards (series 2) have them.

No R33s have doorframes, it's just the glass in all of them.

Originally posted by Jimbo2000

Thanks.

Which one/s have the little circle indicators in the front bar, as i've heard thats only Series II but also recently seen a 94 with them.

Also when the windows are down and the doors open is the whole doorframe visable or just the bottom half cause i love that look.

Cheers.:cool:

  • 3 years later...
Hi all, My Name's James and i'm a Newbie. :newbie:

I'm Looking forward to getting my hands on a R33 GTSt Early next year and just doing a bit of research.

is there a huge difference or maybe none at all between the 93-95 models, thats probably what i'm looking at.

Cheers.

Jim

Hi n00b! :rofl:

Have a read at Here also

Also check date()

LOL wtf 2002 :wave:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...