Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

any of you had worked an L20 or know anything about em? Looking at doing one up and I'm curious what sort of hp i can expect etc.

Thinking about stroking it with a z24 crank etc too, but that might be down the track a little.

the plan to start with is headwork, valves/springs, cam, extractors, zorst, twin webbers. if I can find some webbers at a reasonable price that is! haha

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/
Share on other sites

hmmm, www.ozdat.com is definately the place for these questions...

personally I think you could spend your money on better engines these days, the l20 was great for its time but is very out of date now....eg a ca18det half cut would be under $1500....

The only question I can answer for sure is the z24 crank can be fitted but it does require some light machining to the block for clearance, as well as limiting the revs significantly.

From my research a pair of webbers and a lumpy cam is the most common place to start but that would still be 800+

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1188353
Share on other sites

L18 head onto L20 block raises the comp ratio, combined with higher lift/duration cams & redrilled/reneedled twin Hitachi SU's from the SSS + extractors is a very cheap power up combo, hunt around wrecking yards for the parts.

If you want more from the L20 - you'll reach the point of diminishing returns, and Duncan's suggestion is spot on

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1188761
Share on other sites

yeah thats the thing really, how far do i really want to go. But as long as it goes ok, and doesn't really cost a bundle, I think thats what i want. i have a DR that I'd much rather spend the money on really. A ca18 front cut would be good..but theres all the other costs like engineering and dicking around with it etc the bother me.

But under 1500 is mighty tempting. I'd love to build the l20 with huge compression and cam and whatnot though, just for fun :D Oh, and its the missus' car, and I don't want it faster than mine :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1189780
Share on other sites

apparently the stroke is a fair bit longer, sorry I don't have the exact dimensions here. the 200b standard is good to 7200ish but the navara tops out at about 5500 :D

One other suggestion.....find someone who has already been through this and built a great l20....and then got pissed off and bought a turbo motor instead....nice and cheap to pick up the whole thing with a bit of luck

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1190164
Share on other sites

L20B is a great sounding engine on full song with webers. Its a great old skool engine and such deserves this respect. I had one, but it went like crap. But you can make good horsepower out of these engines. Ive seen 200 rwkW with standard rods, actually standard everything with just forgies running like 30psi. But ask yourself: are you after horsepower reliably, or are you wanting to build a classic? The L20 is a piece of sh#$ compared to the CA or SR and would not even touch an FJ. These latter 2 can make 200rwKw reliably at 14 psi and not that expensive to build. Changing cranks, blah blah blah, what for, to geet beaten by a 1600 with a stock N/A CA18??? Not worth it and you'll be the one biting your fingers when you lose. However, if you are after that particular L20-with-weber sounds and wanting a classic, then go right ahead. Classics rock, but Im preformance biased.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1190207
Share on other sites

Well this is the wifes car, she wants it to be a bit grumpy, actually she wants it really really angry, and i reckon it'd be a bit of fun. I like the L18 head idea that someone mentioned earlier, sounds like a nice easy way of getting some decent compression. In a bluebird it'd still be reasonably quick I'd reckon, and if some little punk beats me with a stock ca18, oh well. The skylines for sorting them out :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1192602
Share on other sites

I have had a mate of mine stroke his l20 out to a 2.4l with extractors webbers, the thing was nuts, lots and lots or touque, rev range was still good, these motors are just about unbreakable, keep the oil and water up to them if they leak and they will go for ever.

I also had my dat 1600 with an l20 twin webbers and exaust they go really well, but one down fall of webbers is that you have to tune the prick all the time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1192634
Share on other sites

well..I've scored a factory nissan head with all the porting and stuff done for an L20, big cam and some 42mm webers, so i guess that helps out a lot.

The guy I know that ran the stroker motor got 9k rpm out of it, and it was there a lot cause they were racing off road with it. I have access to a machined 2.4 crank and bored block if I want them too. He did say the rear main used to leak a little due to cracnk and lock flex at those revs..but you've gotta expect that I suppose :)

I looked into the closed chamber L18 heads, apparently they're the sss heads that everone wants, and therefor no one can get :) oh well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63054-l20b-mods/#findComment-1194147
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...