Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a Power FC on the way for a R3325t with a cat-back exhaust as the only modification.

I was going to plug it in, see how it goes and then spend the money getting a tune when I get a front mount & boost controller later on.

Anyone thinks this is a reasonable idea. I believe that the base tune is actually quite good for the R33 as it is.

Anyone done it this way before?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63836-power-fc-with-no-tuning/
Share on other sites

Guest two.06l
I have a Power FC on the way for a R3325t with a cat-back exhaust as the only modification.

I was going to plug it in, see how it goes and then spend the money getting a tune when I get a front mount & boost controller later on.

Anyone thinks this is a reasonable idea. I believe that the base tune is actually quite good for the R33 as it is.

Anyone done it this way before?

Thanks

Great idea, we made 284rwkw out of a GTR with a base map and some injector correction values reduced to lean it out a bit.

Im using a modified base map and constantly watch the knock reading. The max im getting is in the mid 30's so im happy with that, once ive seen 40. Im very happy with the extra performance and particularly no flat spots. If you monitor knock you should be right. If your getting knock, try reducing the timing down 1 degree. Bit of trial and error at the moment so keep your eye on the knock readings.

what are acceptable knock readings?

I have a R32 GTSt, and i also have a power FC with commander but its not in the car yet as i was waiting till i get something in the car where i actually need to get it tuned. as i didnt want to tune it now then tune it again later when i mod the car. as i cant really afford it.

I put it in just for a squiz once and it was reading things up on the knock sensor. but i didnt know what the knock sensor should read and whats bad etc, so i took it back out

Anyone?

Thanks for the input

dont play with fire.

why cant you wait and plug the PFC in when you get a cooler and get it all done properly?

Thats the thing, I could wait but if I can get the benefit of the Power FC without tuning it yet then why not.

PFC base maps are set up to run on stock engines so thats why I'm thinking about doing it that way.

Thanks two.06l & Robo's sounds like it worked well for you guy's.

Anyone used it on a stock 33 25T though?

Keep in mind the PFC doesn't retard timing if knock is detected.

That said, My setup has not seen any dyno time yet but I have it setup to run 11:1-10.5:1 a/f under boost and my knock usally stays under 25. Last week it some how shot to 70. I never saw the check engine light but I wasn't looking either.

Keep in mind the PFC doesn't retard timing if knock is detected.

That said, My setup has not seen any dyno time yet but I have it setup to run 11:1-10.5:1 a/f under boost and my knock usally stays under 25. Last week it some how shot to 70. I never saw the check engine light but I wasn't looking either.

How you measuring A/F ratios without a dyno?

Thats the thing, I could wait but if I can get the benefit of the Power FC without tuning it yet then why not.  

PFC base maps are set up to run on stock engines so thats why I'm thinking about doing it that way.

i can see what you mean. But if something does go wrong then your up for a motor rebuild quite quickly... when it was very avoidable to begin with

guess i like to do things as safe as possible

My 20 cents worth;

Plenty of cars are tuned without dynos

Ignition timing is easy, advance it till it pings, then knock it back 2 degrees

If you have a PFC you can read knock off the Commander, keep it below 40.

(the dash warning is adjustable via the Commander)

Fuel mixtures are pretty easy to read off the spark plugs, it's been done that way for many decades

If you want to be more precise, you can buy a pretty good A/F meter with a fast and wide lambda sensor for under $500. Spread that amongst 3 or 4 guys and you have cheap tuning for ever.

Most tuning time is used up setting the base parameters (though not much of that with a PFC). When you make further upgrades the required tuning changes are not very dramatic. This is the big advantage of the Power FC, it uses the AFM sensor as its main input. Most upgrades that you do result in changes (hopefully increases) in airflow, that the AFM sees. An example, I have changed intercoolers 3 times and the tune barely changed at all. Maybe 15 minutes of fine tuning on the dyno.

It is always better to develope a rapour with your tuner, so frequent small visits will get you a faster, nicer running, better tuned car than one only visit.

Everyday you drive around with a rich running Skyline costs you $'s in fuel. Not to mention less lambda sensor wear and freer flowing cat.

Bottom line, get it tuned now:cheers:

SK,

Do you play with the timing curve in the low to mid range?

How do you know where it pings there with minimum load?

I have quite free access to dynos so i can play with the mixtures at different load points. Its the timing im a little new at. I know more means better until a point. (We once turned the dissy on a holden v8 from 10-14 degrees and gained 13rwkw) . Generally if you hear ping, retard it.

My PFC is untuned and right out of the box. My A/F gets really rich on the topend. 9.8 was peak hold on my wideband display. running really rich but it runs smoother than the stock ecu.

4316zextronic1.jpg

Before it warms up the sensor

4316zextronic2-med.jpg

Still warming up but it displays everything you see. I haven't hooked up the EGT gauge or the mapsensor yet. You need a laptop to datalog the values you see + TPS and RPM.

SK,

Do you play with the timing curve in the low to mid range?

Hell yes, that's where you feel the biggest improvement in response, not so much power. You can get quite a bit of earlier boost build by advancing the timing.

How do you know where it pings there with minimum load?

With the above in mind, I keep advancing till it pings or the boost starts to drop off. Whichever comes first. On the dyno, you simply watch for power drop off, but that usually corresponds with a boost drop or some pre-ignition anyway.

You can also see it on the AFM voltage, if you go too far (advanced) the airflow drops off.

Generally if you hear ping, retard it

You got it.

:mad:

Thanks for the help everyone SK, BlueRB240

At this stage I will hook it up and see how it goes.

If knock rating getting over 40 then I'll get a tune for sure.

They are such a reasonable price these days it looks like it will become more common to get one early on in the modification process.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have no hard data to report, but I have to say, having driven it to work and back all week, mostly on wet roads (and therefore mostly not able to contemplate anything too outrageous anywhere)..... it is real good. I turned the boost controller on, with duty cycle set to 10% (which may not be enough to actually increase the boost), and the start boost set to 15 psi. That should keep the gate unpressurised until at least 15 psi. And rolling at 80 in 5th, which is <2k rpm, going to WOT sees the MAP go +ve even before it crosses 2k and it has >5 psi by the time it hits 90 km/h. That's still <<2.5k rpm, so I think it's actually doing really well. Because of all the not-quite-ideal things that have been in place since the turbo first went on, it felt laggy. It's actually not. The response appears to be as good as you could hope for with a highflow.
    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
×
×
  • Create New...