Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I find in my car (R33) with full 3 inch turbo back exhaust I get the full 7psi of boost at about 2900rpm in 1st and 2nd...and by just over 2000rpm in 4th or 5th gear.

I was hoping to just fit the Norgren pressure relief valve with check valve to get increased response. Would you get full 7psi by 2500rpm in 1st or 2nd with the Norgren anti creep setup?

The setup is seen in autospeed.

Is there a decent gain at part to half throttle etc?

Thanks

Has anyone had any problems with the Norgren valves/regs. I was reading somewhere that they are mostly plastic inside and one melted under the bonnet of a toyota. I also heard the relief valve opens at different psi depending on what gear- eg. 7psi in 1st then 9psi in 2nd etc..

Anybody found this or is it bs?

I guess in the R33 it should be mounted near airbox so shouldn't get too hot., But then I guess it also depends on the temp of the air passing through the valve.

thanks

I had one.

It was actually quite good.

It certainly brought boost on real quick, and after a fair bit of playing and adjusting I got it pretty good.

Get a metal body one and ou should be fine.

If you already have a bleed valve you can just put the relief valve in front of it and try it out.

You WILL need to adjust your bleed valve after you install the relief though.

BASS OUT

I got a similar one from a place near me.

Any Pneumatics place will have something that will suffice.

Just take the Norgren part number with you and get the equivalent.

Can I suggest you guys go to the STAGEA forums on here and read SK's thread on the JAY CAR BOOST controller kit.

he was saying that this kit allows you to bring on boost fast and is the only boost controller EVER that he has seen that can hold the wastegate completely shut until your set boost setting.

considering they cost less than a bleed valve, it could be worth while looking at.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...