Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Go ahead with the 5 stud conversion if the turbo isnt coming for sometime. When u change it to 5 studs make sure u keep everything so u can change it back to 4 stud when you sell it, that way not all is lost in ur efforts and $.

Would recommend selling the gts and buying a t alot less hassles.

Could have been me - was it a chick driving or a dude with dreds???

A chick driving and a blonde chick in the passenger seat...

I new it was N/A by the wheel size and the blue GT badge on the side...you were still giving it what for though...

I was being tame I only just got my engine rebuilt...

what bootlid spoiler?? :confused:

car is 100% bog stock :)

my car cost me the price of a gtst - and i chose the na.

chrome rims.... hhmm... its a tough one some people can pull it off some cant just have to

see what it looks like when it goes on the car

You CHOSE N/A.....

You can always paint a car for alot less than you can do an engine conversion....

No offense but I have experienced the pain of many engine transplants...and not just my own...

i bought the car for a number of reasons; i am the first owner in australia, the engine is very

very healthy, the car was bought completely stock, the body is in good condition, and i simply

cannot afford the insurance required to pay at my age.

and simply - i really have no need for a turbo car...

well if i do decide to perform an engine conversion it will definately not be soon - during that time i may not even have the car anymore.

btw - i have found the RB25DE to be pretty reliable - just check all the problems in the forced induction thread and the ones in the natural aspiration :D:D:D

increasing boost, etc etc etc

A chick driving and a blonde chick in the passenger seat...

I new it was N/A by the wheel size and the blue GT badge on the side...you were still giving it what for though...

I was being tame I only just got my engine rebuilt...

Nah wasnt me - I'm in a series 1 and I havnt been driving any blond chicks around!! I would have been giving it what for though!! Actually got upto 175 ks on the way to the Sunny coast once - my fastest speed!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...