Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1994 Nissan Skyline R32 GTS-4

4 wheel drive, RB20DET single turbo, 5 speed manual

hybrid bar and plate front mount intercooler

3 inch turbo back exhaust, with cannon muffler w/ 5.5” tip

Heavy duty clutch with 2500lb pressure plate - installed earlier this year at Ross’ Autoclutch

GFB boost controller

Apexi EL boost gauge in Greddy single pillar mount

Pod filter

Bosch Motorsport fuel pump

Cusco brake master cylinder stopper

RWD / 4WD switch

Front strut brace

Car resprayed in Holden Hot House Green, with gold pearl

Trust aftermarket front bar

GTR side skirts

Rear wing removed

Car debadged

Black tint

Lowered 5Zigen aftermarket suspension

17”x8” Advanti Racing Stalker wheels

4 as new Kumho Ecsta 712 tyres; 255/40/17 all round

Alpine MP3 deck

Kicker 6.5” splits in the front

Kenwood 7x10” speakers in the rear

Clarion amp

Alpine subwoofer

Autosalon 2004 trophy winner.

PM or email at :

[email protected]

Or, phone 0402 14 14 38

$19,500 ono

(Plates not included)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/65375-fs-r32-gts4/
Share on other sites

Donarto : yeah I had the car on the dyno at SST here in Perth and made 242 or 243rwhp. I'll try and find the chart and post it up if you want to see it. Also, getting rid of it because I feel like a change ... going to buy a V8 I think!

Alpha : I'm in the Western Suburbs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/65375-fs-r32-gts4/#findComment-1232730
Share on other sites

HAHA... Thats ok man, Ive got a few people interested in it anyway and Im getting excited at the fact that the commodore might be going soon!! Woohoo!!! No more sluging around Perth feeling like in in my late 40s " No offence intended for all those perfectly fine people who are 40 or above.."

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/65375-fs-r32-gts4/#findComment-1232922
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...