Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As we all know series 1 Stagea only came with the normal non triptronic auto but the series 2 came with the same auto but with tiptronic shifting functionality.

Has any one thought about adapting a series 2 tiprtonic system to a series 1 or making a module / switching system to allow tiptronic shifting?

I remember when I was researching putting a Lexus 1UZ V8 into a Volvo I came across instructions for setting up a tiptronic style shifter to control the auto box. In the Lexus the auto trans control computer and engine management computer are combined and if going to aftermarket management the auto would not shift. They were getting around this by wiring up a 5 position rotary switch that gave current to certain wires to control what gear was select and lock up the torque converter.

I assume that the Stagea auto must work the same way. If someone with a bit of electronic smarts had a play around they could probably work out what signals the ECU was sending to the trans to get it to select each gear and lock up the torque converter.

It would probably then be possible to bypass the ECU and manually control the trans shifting with some sort of combination switch or through a module that takes inputs form two click switched on the steering wheel.

Just my 2c worth, but I reckon triptronic is a waste of time - doesn't feel like a real stick and the lag in the change ruins any of the feel in the control of the box... You can get much the same control using the go and stop pedals and leave both hands on the wheel... Also without a clutch, changing just a gear selector just doesn't feel right to me...

What I would like would be for the dash lights to reflect what gear the car is actually in rather than simply diplaying what position the gear lever is in. My last car had triptronic and the dash lights reflected what gear the auto box was in - that I miss, but not the triptronic shift. I also found that with my previous car the fuel economy REALLY sucked when using the triptronic - the Stagea doesn't need much help in the fuel sucking department!

But, just my 2c

ive definately thought about it. if it was cheap enough i recon it could be a possibility. have no idea how to find out about it though?? i predict i will just wait it out for a real manual conversion and spend tiptronic money on more urgent needs like intercooler and suspension :D

  • 2 weeks later...

Got the tiptronic Series 2 and it is fast and smooth... and Tigerloo - u can still keep 2 hands on the wheel coz the gear-shift controls are mounted there :mad: Ive driven tiptronics many times in FTOs and Magnas and BA falcons - and there is just no comparison to the Nissan - awesome tiptronic box :wassup:

In second and third at full acceleration the full gear change happens within about 500 revs max (ie press the upshift about 500rpm before you want the actual shift), but with first to second change and full acceleration I upshift about 1000 revs before i need the change coz its climbing so fast. But yeah - slick and fast - and I might even go the valve body upgrade to get em even sharper :rofl:

Its so nice being in control of the auto change - especially the kick downs happen so much better in my opinion over a straight auto too - you can drop your foot and spool up the boost just before dropping it into second and it really surges nicely.

:cheers:

Got the tiptronic Series 2 and it is fast and smooth... and Tigerloo - u can still keep 2 hands on the wheel coz the gear-shift controls are mounted there :)  

I wondered what those buttons were in your pic in another thread - thought it might have been stereo contols :headspin:

I'm still not convinced with the need for a triptronic - even if the Series 2 is quicker than other shifts - not using a clutch just seems, well, not right when changing gears... No, actually it is WRONG TOTALLY WRONG :rofl:

Besides, I'm too lazy to change gears now...

BTW Brazen, does the series 2 change down automatically when you brake?

Yeah has a safety mechanism built in - changes down and up if you **** up... down im not sure at what revs but it does it, and up when you're too far into the redline!  :wassup:

See, that's what I don't like with the triptronic - you brake into a corner and go to change down, but the auto has already changed down and you end up in first and, well, that kind of sucks - no, it's BLOODY HORRIBLE! :P

I understand the safety thing, but I guess just at what RPM it automatically changes down is going to affect the 'feel' of driving the box...

I have never been a fan of autos but because of circumstances I had to buy an auto and with the tiptronic I'm having a ball. You can just stick it in drive or if you want to have fun you can manually change it especially before you get to a corner or roundabout you just slot it down one and bye bye. Mine in manual mode has yet to change down or up a gear unless I make it do so but I am having trouble getting used to the steering wheel change, to me that is abnormal.

Now just waiting for the MV Automatics shift kit. :aroused:

Gary

Nah Tigerloo it doesnt change on you in that way - its more like when you are just about at a full stop at the lights and you realise you left the tiptronic in 4th and the engines about to cut out at 1 rpm - just about then it downshifts you to first :)

And Gary - have you already ordered that from MV?? I was looking at it last week - so I might use you as the test dummy and wait for your write up on how the tiptronic and auto feels with the new valve body! :) Make sure you let me know!!

:P

Yeah Mate

Allready ordered and paid for just have to wait until he gets some housings back to modify. I don't know if the changes are going to be alot quicker as that could possibly be the electrics but I don't find that a problem as I just change 500 rpm before I want it to change. Also going to fit an oil cooler to it as well to try to keep it a bit cooler, I hope.

Will let you know how it goes.

Gary

  • 11 months later...

The two transmissions are pretty much the same in their major parts and gears but the valvebodies are completely different and the transmission control unit is completely different and is actually one unit with the ECU.

I am some of the non turbo models had a separate unit for the trans but I don't know if any of them were tiptronics. If they were you could use one of them.

Bu5ter has just built an auto up - of the older style your series on1 - and used a B&M shifter or something like that. I'm not sure what other mods exactly though. That could be a better option than trying to put some series two parts on your series one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...