Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

being farely new to the skyline scene, or perfomance in general, im in need of some advice.

Im planning on doing an upgrade to r33 t. So far im looking at;

- Nismo Fuel Pump

- Sard Fuel Regulator Type-R

- Sard Fuel Injectors 550cc

this stuff im pretty sure i want and am going to get. the problem is the engine management.

I dont know squat about it, and im happy to admit that. Everyone seems to have an Apexi PowerFC. But now i read the thread at the top of this page and see the Greddy E-management.

My questions are these;

* Am i missing anything for this upgrade (fuel wise)

* and which is a better computer for my needs, either out of the two mentioned or if there is something better i've overlooked completely.

If anyone can shed some light on my situation it would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/66155-need-help-engine-management/
Share on other sites

if you dont have a turbo dont bother with injectors or a reg. you dont need them

As for a Nismo pump... a Bosch unit can do the same job at a cheaper price im sure

buy all parts at once (includin turbo) and do the mods at one time, saves retune after retune costs.

At the moment ive got 3" turbo back, HKS Pod and Intercooler. Standard Turbo.

Im looking at nengun for the parts mentioned. anywhere else to look? nengun dont have bosch.

If i do get a bigger turbo, the injectors and reg. will be needed though, right?

austalia has bosch mate.

thats local stuff.

Yeah, injectors'reg will be needed. But as i said.

No point doing them till needed as its only added retune costs.

stay away from 550sard's. get the 700cc nismo ($50-$80 extra from memory) they are a strainght fit and cause less problems cause of it

My suggestions. as always, is to first work out what it is that you want to do with the car, then how much power you need to achieve that result, then get an appreciation as to how much that is going to cost.

An example, if 200 rwkw will achieve what you want, then you don't need any of the stuff you have listed, and $3K should get you there. If its 400 rwkw then $10K won't be enough.

So what is it that you want to achieve?

:)

PS; an EManage is a piggy back solution, it is NOT comparable with a Power FC which is a full computer. The Power FC will always be superior in a manual application. For autos, an SAFC is a lot cheaper than an Emanage for similar results.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...