Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Very interesting day! Some serious power on show.

Although i made a joke of it today I was very very happy with my power curve and the cars very balanced performance. I mean come on people its only got a turbo back zorst! lol...

To be honest I was more happy the clutch held it down for three runs!

Was very suprised snoozy!!! 216 huh??? Stock huh??? pfttt

I'll be in trojan a few times before the next D-Day I think ;-)

I'd like to take this oppertunity to thank all those who came along,especially those who ran their cars. There were some standouts that I think were memorable:Tim's S13 running one of the neatest graph's seen on the day,the look of suprise on Race Snooze's face at a better-than-expected power figure(and no,Shaun-we all know it's not standard,LOL!!),the awesome run by Con's Trojan Motorsports' GTS-T(345 rwkw out of a RB25-FAAAARK!),Spyro's "sleeper" work ute,Amaru's 32 coming "on song" with a note that brought a big grin to my face,the mighty 186 powered Holden sounding so traditionally tough,the determination of the old school Soarer's owner(sorry,guy:lost your name in the faded memory bank...)to head home and get a spare after flatting a tyre on his first run...the list,for me,goes on.These are just a few standouts still clear in my hazy memory.Oh,and a certain little ZR running 509.something kilowatts(Killer-watts?!)at the tyres...DAAAAYYYM! Congrat's,Luch,on another trophy for the cabinet! Tim with the black S13 left too early:he won Judges' choice award-if you're on here,Tim,PM me-I've got a prize to get to you! And a big thanks to Glenn,Stace',Kris,our intrepid SAU camera crew,and all those behind the scenes for all their help.Plus of course Pete at Auto Tech for the day!

Very cool day, and yes the Z and the 345kw RB25 were standouts for me...

As for the Camera crew, your welcome Jayce (any chance to get a sh*t load of hot cars on film!), we will start editing straight away and hopefully we will have a preview for you in a matter of weeks!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...