Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im currently considerig buying another rb20, the compression results the seller gave me are as follws...

1-130

2-135

3-130

4-130

5-130

6-135

Is it just me or are these numbers a bit low. Im not worried about the difference seen in no2 and 6. I just thought a healthy engine should show compression of maybe 150 - 160? Although seller assures me these number are spot on? test was done on a warm engine

Thanks for your time, Tim

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/67557-rb20det-compression-results/
Share on other sites

i have a 1989 rb20det eccs in my HR31 Gts-x

did compression test the other week. the engine is stock, runs normal boost, and runs beautifully. ran 135 on all 6.

my other mates' rb20det silvertop is bout 113 on all 6 and it's unhealthy.

That's very close to what both my RB20's tested at recently..

My gauge has always read low, and seems to read 130psi on a healthy engine. So I wouldn't be too worried.

As long as they are within 10% everything should be fairly fine.

my rb20det with 160 kms on the car had it around 150 to 160 with most on 155

but apparently the engine was rebuilt bout 30thousand kms ago

but i remember somewhere it doesnt really matter as long as there isnt a big difference between the cylinders

might not be a bad idea to pay to get it tested by a mechanic you know

just to elaborate on what i just said th ough, a comrpession test won't pick up everything

i've comp tested ca18det's which were piston slapping pieces of crap and they pulled 165-170psi all round

i've also tested an ex-drifted sr20 which got 165psi but engine ran nice and smoothly, just had been driven on rev-limiter for most of it's life...

  • 5 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...