Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i made 138.75 rwkw, on my cefiro, RB20DET with POD, FMIC, 3in zorst hi-flow cat. @ 6psi, with 125000kms

I didnt think it was possible to run your car on lower than stock boost I know the with the 32 stock boost is 7psi Id say that would be the same with the ceffy as they both use the RB20 aswell so how do you run 6psi?

r32 stock boost is actualy 10psi.. 33's stock boost is 6-7psi how ever the actuators from both turbos fit each other soooo if it is running 6psi i'd say its possible either got a rb25 turbo on it or its for a rb25 actuator on the rb20 turbo... and yer bump your boost up to about 10.. 6psi in mine feels shithouse :) good on fuel economy tho i guess and boost level doesnt matter when not running around or playing so either way

nah.. they all run 10psi stock.. including mine. I think the ceffys run slightly lower boost stock out of the factory for some reason.

I'm about to embark on full exhaust, rb25 turbo, fmic, and probably S-AFC.. Should be interesting to see how it goes, especially with an ...auto :Oops: (until that gets munced)

250rwhp is about 185rwkw.. so that seems to be expected. 250rwHP always sounds a bit more impressive - even though its just smoke and mirrors :rofl: Standard RB20 turbo you can get around 160rwkw.. add in the rb25 turbo and you gain another 20-30 at the wheels.

boosted_32: back to your original question.. I reckon around 300rwhp (220-230rwkw).

I didnt think it was possible to run your car on lower than stock boost I know the with the 32 stock boost is 7psi Id say that would be the same with the ceffy as they both use the RB20 aswell so how do you run 6psi?

Whatever the stock boost is that is what i was running, it may be 7psi, my boost gauge says 0.5bar, so whatever that is in PSI that is what i am running.

with ur rb20det in ur silvia,wot gearbox,tail shaft n diff r u using???

i made 127rwkw 89' 32gtst auto with k&n pod,2 1/2 cat back exhaust 3" tip 10psi

wots that in hp???

is it good? decent? or throw away?

gearbox == r32 gtst 5speed, tailshaft== something that fits... (previous owner did conversion)... the diff is a bit of a unknown either way.. its locked 99% of the time /

127rwkw is around 170rwhp thats not to bad for your mods considering thats pritty much stock.. you'd get better horsepower out of a 3inch mandrel bend turbo back exhaust 10psi is factory... front mount intercooler and also a solid intake pipe (turbo to afm)

and yer that should get you goin around the 160ish maybe a little bit more rwkw

Hi guys im just about to do a mild upgrade on my R32 skyline and would like some feedback.

MODS CAR ALREADY HAS:

3" exhaust with 3" s/s dump

Big 600x300x80 intercooler with 3" piping

electronic boost controller

BOV

POD

(Made 250rwhp @ 1bar with stock turbo)

Thanks

Hey boosted was this setup on a completly stock ecu without tunning or any fuel adjustments?

Do you think a tunned SAFC would make a power / fuel usage difference?

Also did you end up doing a 1/4 mile time with this setup, if so what did you get?

Anyone else please feel free too comment

Thanks

Hey boosted was this setup on a completly stock ecu without tunning or any fuel adjustments?  

Do you think a tunned SAFC would make a power / fuel usage difference?

Also did you end up doing a 1/4 mile time with this setup, if so what did you get?

Anyone else please feel free too comment

Thanks

Hi mate with thoes mods I was using the stock ECU and stock fuel system. I wouldnt recommend the SAFC just beacuse it olny allows you to chang the air/fuel mixtures and it still cost you bout $300-400 for one of them Im getting my standard ECU remapped for $650 including dyno time that way you can change alot more settings then just your fuel/air. sorry mate have never run my car down the 1/4 mile

gearbox == r32 gtst 5speed, tailshaft== something that fits... (previous owner did conversion)... the diff is a bit of a unknown either way.. its locked 99% of the time /

127rwkw is around 170rwhp thats not to bad for your mods considering thats pritty much stock.. you'd get better horsepower out of a 3inch mandrel bend turbo back exhaust 10psi is factory... front mount intercooler and also a solid intake pipe (turbo to afm)  

and yer that should get you goin around the 160ish maybe a little bit more rwkw

Cheers Wazz, i measured my exhaust again today n found its actually 3 1/2" cat-back to a 3" tip,i got it off another gtst at the same car yard i got mine,its mandrel bend,but dont know what brand(no brands on it) both cars are FRESH imports, anyhow my question.....where is 'STICK'??? im in sydney,noticed ur in cairns, does 'Stick' have a solid intake pipe n turbo back 2 cat exhaust n how much?

Boosted_32 about getting ur standard ecu remapped, is this place in sydney?

Stick is up here in cairns.. your better off tho just getting a pipe made up any place that does exhaust's and/or intercooler piping.. its not to hard if you have any mates that are boiler makers or do something in the metal industry and can tig/mig weld.. (tig is neater than mig.. i'd prefer tig) they can make it up shouldnt cost any more than 100 bux..

Hi mate with thoes mods I was using the stock ECU and stock fuel system. I wouldnt recommend the SAFC just beacuse it olny allows you to chang the air/fuel mixtures and it still cost you bout $300-400 for one of them Im getting my standard ECU remapped for $650 including dyno time that way you can change alot more settings then just your fuel/air. sorry mate have never run my car down the 1/4 mile

Thanks for the reply, i was thinking of the option simply to fit a ebc and have two settings on the SAFC for 12psi (daily) and 1BAR (drag).....

Im just curious as from your experience, you think that your air / fuel ratio was fine (not lear or rich) at 1BAR and below? And that you think that a SAFC wouldnt fine tune the air/ fuel ratio more and increase power?

I know the option of remapping would give you more flexivilty with timming etc for more power but if this setup can handle running on stock ecu wouldnt the ecu retard the timming anyway?

Thanks for the reply, i was thinking of the option simply to fit a ebc and have two settings on the SAFC for 12psi (daily) and 1BAR (drag).....

Im just curious as from your experience, you think that your air / fuel ratio was fine (not lear or rich) at 1BAR and below? And that you think that a SAFC wouldnt fine tune the air/ fuel ratio more and increase power?

I know the option of remapping would give you more flexivilty with timming etc for more power but if this setup can handle running on stock ecu wouldnt the ecu retard the timming anyway?

Yes you have a point by getting your ECU remaped you can only have it tuned to 1 setting, I dont know much about the SAFC im not sure if you can have 2 different settings or not but I had a mate running one of these and its was a bit of a bitch to tune and for the extra couple of hunderd to get the ECU remaped its well worth it especially if you are intending to upgrade your injectors you will then need to move to a programable ECU or get the stocko remaped anyway, for thoes basic mods my car Had the stock ECU worked fine and wasnt leaning out but any other mods such as turbo upgrade and running more boost I would definatley recommend the remapping of the ECU over the SAFC.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually everyone on the roads was really well behaved. The only person that did any minor tailgating was a local hoon in a Turbo Focus. Unfortunately we weren't going the same way so there was no grand initial D touge battle. Lots of people pulled over and let me through. The amount of "Hey man nice car, omg skyline, nice 34 man woo" was suprising. Like really suprising. Like almost annoying. My partner was obviously surprised, she'd never seen anyone in the real world point out the car/like the car/want to chat about the car before, so to have like 3 people per day mention it was notable, I could finally say SEE? SOMEONE THINKS THEY'RE COOL. Everyone was also pretty suprised about the weather. Every day was dry and about ~13-14C. Mount Wellington had a sign that said they close the gates at 9pm and I was heading up there at about ~7:30. It was VERY apparent that conditions were getting significantly worse by the minute on the way up and down. The road on the mountain was terrible though, it's no driving road. I have various suspension related questions now. Luckily it was only about 20 minutes from where we were staying to the top of the mountain as said Google maps. We only had the 2 nights in Hobart. We went to the Farm Gate Market though which was really good - And went down to the Hastings Thermal springs/caves down there during the day. I'd definitely be up for going back again, so luckily there's a few more sights yet to see. Didn't get to do the west coast/queenstown/cradle mountain so this was supposed to be a 'scouting' trip anyway of sorts if I were to one day do/take part in/organize a more car-focused trip. As for the boat, it wasn't bad. Well it was bad, but not in the way you're thinking. We did the night trip which leaves at 6:45 (though you have to be there ~2 hours earlier) and arrives the next morning at about 6am. There is nothing to do on the ship. If you plan accordingly and bring a book/tablet/show to watch/charger you can just chill out, take some Travacalm and just sleep through it. The food there is an extremely basic buffet that costs $32 a plate, or $14 for a $3 pizza. The way back we had a travel kettle and a few different types of cup noodles and made our own tea/coffee in the room. This was a far superior way to do it. At the very least book one of the rooms with beds. I guess as we were in the off season we didn't have room mates. You get an option for rooms with 4 beds (2x bunks) or a room with just the two bottom beds. There's also some option for a deluxe queen bed but it's much pricer. We've been on sleeper trains in Asia before so we figured this is similar (and it was)
    • You just gotta be really, really, really clear and decisive with what you want your end product to be. 99% of people who want this conversion aren't "I want to run a 295 front tyre!" so they don't really need the widebody. They just want the OEM body to look a little less dumpy, so bonnet, bar, skirts job done with some camber, stretch, slam. It's when you want that, but then decide to pivot later you get big problems. See also if you're willing to get an all in one fibreglass bar, and you're willing to accept fibreglass problems like cracking the entire item on a driveway, instead of just a piece attached to the bottom, etc etc etc. Decide this all before buyin'.
    • After @Kinkstaah debacle, I'd never want to try and get it right 😛
    • The hood lines up with the fenders. The front bar doesn't perfectly line up with the fenders where the wheel arch is. You have to 'squeeze' the front bar 'in' as it wants to naturally flare out and be longer on the sides. There's a few threads where people notice this when they only swap a GTR style bumper and front bar. Unless you have genuine OEM items - you may be better served getting conversion kits. There are GTT bumpers to fit GTR hoods. There are GTR hoods (non genuine) to fit the GTT bracketry. MAY  
×
×
  • Create New...