Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I just had my car tuned at Hills (awesome tuner btw - thanks to all who recommended them) and got 177rwkw, which I'm damn pleased with. I'd like to know what my torque is though, but the car was dyno'd in 3rd and is giving me insane numbers. I think I saw a thread on this a while back but noone actually said how you can convert the number to the real torque.

Anyway, you can get my dyno sheet at www.ozemail.com.au/~caddies

Anyone know?

I'm sure it's got something to do with the 1.3:1 gearing on 3rd, but dividing by 1.3 certainly isn't giving me correct numbers.

Cheers,

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm still interested in figuring out the flywheel torque too :(

Out of interest what mods have you got and what boost are you running? My intercooler plumbing is killing my power, I'm going to get that sorted early next year. Every mechanic that sees the way the pipes are hooked up with right-angle bends gives me a worse reaction and a bigger speech on how crap it is. Mark's was the worst :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104004
Share on other sites

OK I think I have nailed it. I think the answer to your original question is that your dyno is showing 2.33 times the flywheel torque after losses(I will explain what I mean by that later). I don't know why it's 2.33 but I will explain how I got there.

Firstly the I have used ratios from here which I think are correct. My car redlines at about 100km/h in second so I know the first one I had was wrong. So using this your max power at 129km/h is 6157 engine RPM, which seems fair. At this speed your wheels are doing 1084 RPM. Now given that kw=NmxRPM/9551, that means with 177kW the torque at the wheels is 1559.7Nm at the wheels. Thats impresive.

So I think what the dyno operators do when they set it to display torque at the wheels is reflect this back to the flywheel. eg. Torque=Nm@wheels/(Gear Ratio X Final Ratio). That would give you 274.56Nm at your peak power (you get the same figure if

you put 177 and 6157 into the Nm=kwx9551/RPM formula where RPM is engine RPM). This again seems fair because the torque at peak power at the fly with stock 184kw@6400RPM is 274.59Nm. So you are making about the same torque at the wheels as a stocker at the fly, but slightly less power at the wheels than stock fly power due to the fact your peak is at slightly less RPM.

Here is the spreadsheet with the right gearing. You can put in you tyre stuff, different speeds and power to find torque.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104406
Share on other sites

OK, here's a full list of my performance mods -

* HKS Type S FMIC

* HKS Cam Slide Pulley on the exhaust camshaft - 2 degress retarded

* Trust Airinx Pod Filter

* 3" front/dump combo pipe with a separate wastegate line, all HPC coated.

* Fujitsubo twin 3.5" catback exhaust

* Apexi Super AFC

* GFB Bleed valve (14psi)

* GFB Hybrid BOV (not really a performance mod, but it could affect how the car runs I suppose)

I think that's it.

Cheers,

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104454
Share on other sites

b2barker,

That all makes a lot of sense. I am glad we finally got this all sorted out. I might copy and edit my dynosheet's Torque scale on the left to reflect what it should be. After all, even if I get it slightly wrong, I'll at least be closer to what it should be.

Cheers,

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104457
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...