Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as the tittle states i was just wondering what AFM are prefered and recommended. i am looking for somthing that is straight swap or least difficult to adapt with standard GTR AFM and i am tossing up between the Z32 and the Q45. so far i have found that they are booth pretty much on par.

any suggestions? thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69191-q45-or-z32/
Share on other sites

cam, it was more.. which will just swap over with stock gtr afm's... my guess is as nismoid said.. dunno wat the plugs on standard gtr afm's are like but yer... z32's tend to be a common upgrade on gtr's from wat i have heard

Warrick,

What was more? what will swap with what? :confused:

The plug on a Z32 is 5 pin ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69191-q45-or-z32/#findComment-1281871
Share on other sites

Hi GTR94, if you had done a search you would have found out that GTR AFM's are 65 mm. A search would have told you that Z32 AFM's are 80 mm (same as RB20/25) and Q45's are 90 mm. By doing a search you would have noted that NONE of them are a straight swap over. They won't fit the airfilter box or POD's for a start, as quick search would have shown. The ECU will also need retuning, as per the search results.

;)

PS; did I mention that you should do a search?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69191-q45-or-z32/#findComment-1282024
Share on other sites

it all depends on your rwhp level you want to run

my first

first choice

good up to 540rwhp and around $150ea second hand

rb20/25 are straight fit (same plug ) but will requires sum piping mods and tuning adjustment

second choice

good to around ~700rwhp and around $300 second hand + $30 plug

Z32 require a different plug solider in and the same piping as rb20/25 and a larger tuning adjustment

Q45 i have only seen on one car that was a 1100rwhp drag car(apexi's car)

all are relative easy to fit when running APEXI PFC as you can select afm at the touch of a button

cheers

pete

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69191-q45-or-z32/#findComment-1282246
Share on other sites

There are 2 issues with AFM's, one is the restriction caused by the small diameter. The second problem is the one you hear about most often and that is the calibration of the hot wire sensor for higher airflows.

The Nismo GTR replacement AFM's I have seen are the standard GTR diameter (65 mm) with what look like Z32 sensors inserted into them (replacing the standard sensor). This fixes the calibration problem, but does nothing for the diameter based restriction.

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69191-q45-or-z32/#findComment-1283525
Share on other sites

there are a large number of cars running upwards of 330rwkw here in Vic now with the Nismo items.

They have no problem and results arent too dis-similar to others with say Z32's.

every car is different though.

Lee - will find out Wed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69191-q45-or-z32/#findComment-1284621
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...