Jump to content
SAU Community

300rwhp (225rwkw)... what does it take?


Recommended Posts

Guest Nismo_Freak

My target is 300rwhp w/o swapping the stock turbo. This would be 300rwhp in American terms if that means anything, I have yet to figure out if there is a difference. What would I need to do this without swapping the turbo and how reliable would it be. I will have a large aluminum radiator for sure since my stock 240SX one would explode.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6961-300rwhp-225rwkw-what-does-it-take/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think 225rwkw would be very easy to achieve, to begin with.

My '95 R33 GTS-T

192rwkw @ 12psi

168rwkw @ 8psi

Mods:

Cat back exhaust

HKS Pod Filter

FMIC

2 Stage boost controller

I was only using 96 octane and havent had a tune or oil change in 7,500km either.

:)

http://skylines.pnc.com.au

Guest Nismo_Freak

Ok heres what I have planned:

RB25DET

Hybrid FMIC w/ Custom Piping

Apexi GT-Spec Exhaust (3.75")

Custom 3.5" Downpipe to Exhaust (No Cat)

Apexi Intake w/ Homemade Cold Air Box

Greddy Profec B Boost Controller

Walbro 255Lph Fuel Pump

HKS SSQV BOV

Single Disc 6-puck Clutch

Cusco LSD (1.5 or 2 way)

Apexi Turbo Timer

Greddy Boost Gauge

Redline 75w140 Gear Oil in Tranny

Amsoil 10w30 in Motor (too thin?)

Boost im prolly gonna set at 12 psi unless the turbo can handle 14psi and be reliable for a while.

Edit* - Replaced S-AFC w/ POWER FC

sounds very good nismo freak which engine is it the seies 1 engine or series 2 engine ?

series 1 engine you can run 14 psi series 2 I would stick to 12 psi

ben I'm not doubting that was the figure you made but some dyno's are very optimistic thats ~~~

drdrifts old car only made 170 rwkw but ran a 108 mph at the drags which says closer to 200 rwkw if you get what I'm, saying some read high some read low its hard to campare apples with apples

meggala

Nismo_Freak

So far I have the following mods

3" custom dump and front, high flow cat, 3" N1 style cat back

Hybrid FMIC with 3" pipwork

Pod with cold air partition

Power FC with Boost controller

Turbosmart BOV

9 button clutch

plus (irrelevant to this thread) various suspension, TT, boost guage, etc

On a dyno dynamics dyno, made 260rwhp at 0.85 bar (254 at 0.7 bar) when the clutch started slipping and the power curve flat lined. Of further concern was that the AFM maxed out at 4500rpm and the curve 'fell over'. I am sure with the clutch now fixed and a Z32 afm on its way, that I will be able to get a little more, however from what I have read of other peoples experience, and my tuner's advice, a stock R33 turbo would not be able to support 300rwhp (about 408bhp it think). As for your fuel pump, not too sure you would need to replace it as my injectors were running at 77%, perhaps you could get away with just a fuel pressure regulator instead? Also of a bit of concern at the moment is traction. I am running 255/40/17 goodyear revspecs and although they are one of the better gripping tyres, power oversteer (which is alot of fun) and straight line traction off the mark are starting to become issues.

Some food for thought anyways

Steve

EDIT: Just notice you are talking dynojet type dyno? I believe that the figure I quoted above would probably make it past the 300rwhp if it was done on a dynojet - from the comments I have read in other threads about the differences between dynodynamics and dynojet.

My mods,

R33 gtst

3" turbo back exhaust.

No cat

custom FMIC

Brass button clutch

higher boost on standard turbo.

HKS airpod.

On a dyno dymatics with 11psi my car did 197rwkw

On a dynodymatics at a skyline meet with 13psi my car did 180rwkw.

This should show the inconsistancy of the dynos.

I think that 180rwkw is the correct figure (and meggala can vowge for that).

Guest Nismo_Freak

Ok .... thanks for the info. I need to get a brandname on the clutch. What would hold alot of power and not slip while being cheap and streetable? Also I forgot to include I would run a Z32 MAF. I have also been looking into a pulley kit for the RB since on the VG30DETT UR Pulleys dynoed another 30hp @ the wheels (Dynojet).

Originally posted by Nismo_Freak

Ok .... thanks for the info. I need to get a brandname on the clutch. What would hold alot of power and not slip while being cheap and streetable? Also I forgot to include I would run a Z32 MAF. I have also been looking into a pulley kit for the RB since on the VG30DETT UR Pulleys dynoed another 30hp @ the wheels (Dynojet).

You dont get nothin for nothin Nismo_freak :(

300rwhp your gonna need a 5puck bruss button clutch minimum or twin plate if u are gonna drag race fairly often.....

I have just under 300hp and cooked my 2500lb clutch last night at the drags on 2nd run of 2nd outing (clutch is 3 months old)

I agree with Macka, getting the 300rwhp isn't that difficult, but having reliability aswell is not so easy. At 260+hp you may well have to look at a heavy duty or twin-plate clutch, weak points in the engine such as pistons may start to show themselves.

But to get the 300rwhp is going to require you running the turbo at stressful levels. Even though the turbo can just support those levels it is not going to last particularly long at 1bar.

Just some things to keep in mind.

See'ya:burnout:

Sorry ill butt in if Megs cant get online for awhile...

GODF4Th3R Series 2 came out with a Plastic impeller turbo wheel which spools faster but in turn can break away under higher boost!

Croat Your going to be paying $1500-$1800 for a good quality Highflow which is now starting to prove a very good move for alot of owners...no oil or water line changes, no dump pipe or compressor inlet or outlet changes which saves alot of $$ which people sometimes dont consider..

Hope i didnt butt in!

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...