Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I dono why'd you give up the a31 front end though... maybe for a 180 front..

There was a s14 fronted cef posted up in this section some time ago now and I think most people didn't like it. I reckon it could be ok but if anyone finds photos please post front and back and side if possible.. It's pointless seeing a s15 fronted cef when it just looks like a s15 from the front :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69616-s15-fronted-a31s/#findComment-1289194
Share on other sites

hahaha that laufiro is about as NZ as they come, matt black paint, workshopX frontbar

call me the biggest playahater ever but the front fender doesn't link up to the rest of the panel work properly ie: the "a" pillar

not usually a big concern but this could cause rust if not sealed properly when rain leaks through those cracks, laurel and cefiro fenders are notorious for rust apparatnly

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69616-s15-fronted-a31s/#findComment-1289215
Share on other sites

you mean like an N13 pulsar front bolted onto a brandnew nissan pathfinder?

or or what about an 80's CA nissan EXA bolted onto a le man's nissan R390 race car?

the possiblities are endless... simply endless...

They all sound good to me, but why not swap it around, bolt a Pathfinder front to a N13 pulsar? :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69616-s15-fronted-a31s/#findComment-1289263
Share on other sites

Anything R34 is pretty horn IMHO, I want a R34 kit for my R32 like this one at Garage-13:

3432aa.jpg

Click for full-size

But since it's "from $4490" kinda hard to justify on a car not worth much more than double that, factor in re-spray and i think it'd only be worth it on a R32 GTR.

But i can dream. *sigh*

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69616-s15-fronted-a31s/#findComment-1289437
Share on other sites

roflmao garage-13's R324

its made by Bee-R and I think that's garage-13's pipedream for suckering someone into buying the original so they can copy it.

and the R34 on R33 unit they sell is a URAS one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69616-s15-fronted-a31s/#findComment-1291012
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...