Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

I have a turbo kit for sale off an RB26

It contains the following:

HKS TA45 in excellent condition

HKS Cast manifold

HKS external gate

HKS alloy inlet pipe for 2 afm's

Same kit as Autostyles 500+rwhp rb26 orange Z-car runs

Located in Sydney

Final price drop $1800 no offers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69696-fs-rb26-hks-ta45-650ps-kit/
Share on other sites

the ta45 was the older version basically of the t51 they now use. If it is a ta45 the front ar. will be .72 and the rear a massive 1.12. They will flow up to 800ps, and the cast manifold if its the true kit is a log style low mount with the hks 48mm external wastegate mounted high!! When i bought my GTR 4 years ago it had this kit and made 320rwkw on 18psi, but unfortunately the manifold had a crack and made it lag monster. They are a great turbo for the price you pay for them and are truely huge, a little to big for a stock GTR so I also downsized the rear housing to a more friendly read usable .92 and put the t51 kia front and rear wheels in it now its fantastic like having a t51 basically....

Hope this helps some enquires about it, and good luck with the sale.

Daniel.

Pics here

IMGP0417_resize.JPG

IMGP0418_resize.JPG

IMGP0422_resize.JPG

IMGP0423_resize.JPG

IMGP0421_resize.JPG

The exhaust manifold has no cracks. There is some surface rust but its getting beadblasted at the moment.

The exhaust housing is HKS 0.90. Thats the only markings i could find on the exhaust housing

dont mean to steal your thread, but i have half one of these kits lying around (minus turbo and wastegate)i have manifold with a small crack which can be fixed, and the 2 alloy pipes (the double one and one that says 'HKS POWER' which sits where the stock pipe that says 'TWIN TURBO' is) If these bits can be of any help just let me know.

from the pictures it has the compressor cover as used on the t04, it doesnt have any ar on the front housing and according to hks specs has a .90 rear housing. The ta45 or t45s, has a stamped ar on the front housing of .72 and one on the rear of 1.12. Hope this helps still a very very good turbo and i have seen this trubo on a supra do 390rwkw!!!

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...