Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why did not anyone answer his question ?

However I also noted that the manual & auto skyline's diff ratio are different. The build plate says RC43 for auto (4.3 diff) and

manual got RC41 (4.1 diff).

I want to know if this is true and the benifits / disadvantages are.

hey, you warm up the thread again....

I have done my conversion.... it worked out this way:

Conversion: $5K incl full service, front caster rods & timing belt.

Result: I kept my sunroof, abs, my fav colour, and this car with the engine that I know I can trust.

Selling: The best "stupid" offer was $14K, so it means I loss $9K if I sell... that hurst. The decent S2 are around $22K cause if

I sell than buy again, no point getting the same S1, need to go at least S2... so with $14K optimistic on hand, need to come up with another $8K, and those may not come with abs, sunroof, and prob not my colour too. Believe me most replacement R33 that I found has no abs, no sunroof. Plus a few months without car until the car arrive... hopefully before the new law.

So the answer is: Conversion... which I did and I did not regret it.

I keep my auto diff with 4.3 ratio and not changing it, save me the $$$.

The theory is the bigger the ratio the shorter the gearing for better accel, but higher fuel consumption and lower top speed (unless the engine management's rev limit is raised). The smaller the ratio, the less it rev and less using fuel, but it feels making a bit less power but car can achieve higher top speed at the same rev.

It makes sense if auto R33 was given bigger ratio to give the feel of power, as the 1st gear ratio in the auto box is a bit lower than its manual siblings. So the bigger diff is to offset the lower 1st gear ratio in the auto - helps car accelerate from standing still.

The benefits since the gearing is a bit shorter, theoretically it helps in acceleration. But since my tyres & rims r still stock, they don't grip too well even in the dry, so until I get a wider rim and grippier tyres then I'll be able to accelerate much quicker than most other manual R33. Good for drag races I suppose? A grippy Daiken Exedy clutch also makes it very easy to spin my rear tyres.

The disadvantage is that compared to other manuals with 4.1 ratio, my car would run a higher rpm at the same cruise speed -> slightly increase fuel consumption and may have slightly less top speed, so may not be ideal for long straight track use...

But Trust made 4.3 diff, so I suppose many dedicated tuners in Japan change the 4.1 diff to 4.3 too, and get better acceleration.

The slight difference also very small, so it may be hard to notice or affect the car in anyway..... maybe just a couple tenths of a second difference only on the drags. It worked out that 4.3-4.1 = 0.2 --> 0.2/4.1 * 100% = 0.49% increase... so if a genuine manual cars rev 2500rpm @ 100km/h cruise, mine will be revving @ 2623rpm => 123rpm more....

Top speed on the track: if other cars made say around 195km/h @ 5000rpm in 5th, then at the same rev I would only get abt 185km/h, so I need to rev it to +/-5250rpm just to keep up with others...

Hope I'm right...

Rianto

sell it? why?

The car has been converted now so it's manual. Too late to sell now and would be foolish to sell it now.

it's running very fine now and has got some extra mods on it since converted.

And no it's not $6K. The reason why it goes to $5K is because I did not do the conversion alone, but also do lots of other MAJOR service in one go. I think conversion parts & labour alone is around $3.5K which is about average for R33. The rest $1000 is for new timing belt, new suspension bushes, full engine oil change, manual speedo (some ppl still use auto speedo in conversion which is a dead giveaway), get my front disc brake machined & pad replaced, and finally the last $500 is for our PM John Howard.

That's why it's so expensive coz the 10% GST.

thx for the support.

remember even if I sell and got another S1 manual for $18-19K, still need to pay about 1000 for importer/broker fee, lucky if it includes GST.

Then on road cost which is another stamp duty + rego which is not in that purchase price. Then you need to do full service for peace of mind depending how many kms on the odo, say another $1000k to get it done like my service. I replace my timing belt at 46,000km just to be 100% safe. it doesn't come cheap either.

stamp duty, gst... they both hurts pocket a lot.

then I need to find another alarm

then window tint

reinstall my audio system which is a pain...

Originally posted by rs73

sell it? why?

The car has been converted now so it's manual. Too late to sell now and would be foolish to sell it now.

it's running very fine now and has got some extra mods on it since converted.

And no it's not $6K. The reason why it goes to $5K is because I did not do the conversion alone, but also do lots of other MAJOR service in one go. I think conversion parts & labour alone is around $3.5K which is about average for R33. The rest $1000 is for new timing belt, new suspension bushes, full engine oil change, manual speedo (some ppl still use auto speedo in conversion which is a dead giveaway), get my front disc brake machined & pad replaced, and finally the last $500 is for our PM John Howard.  

That's why it's so expensive coz the 10% GST.

Hey mate

I did the same.. just got my car on the road yesterday... and I LOVE IT. best thing i ever done.. you can actually DRIVE the car now :D

Ive got the 4.3:1 ratio and it seems really zippy.. and i love it... I would not change it for the world.. at least i got a good advantage on other manual r33's

Mine cost me $2500 for the conversion kit and $360 for a replacement heavy duty clutch and a flywheel machine..

I have not got the labour bill yet but im thinkin only about $300 because i did alot and it was done at a friends shop.

You have the series 1.5 like me.. has ABS one air bag series 2 engine and sunroof.. MSPEC.

They are nice.. I think these were a special that were made in auto mostly...

Anyway nice ride and its good to see other people going through what i went through.. But i blew my auto because they are only good for 170rwkw.

Ive got a apexi speed meter and it measured a .5 of a second faster then the auto.. must be the good ratio's kicking in :P

Maybe we should all start mass buying auto GTS-T and convert them to manual....

Advantage:

- Majority of auto are less likely to have been trashed in Japan compared to manual ones.

- Buying auto are now cheaper than manual due to low demand, high overstock

- Buying bulk auto are much cheaper as we can all work out a deal, say let's do a 150 cars purchase at once.... at each car prices up to $8000 less than manual?

- Buying bulk for manual box, parts & clutches also could be cheaper, so around $2500 each for 150 sets all inclusive?

- Labour can be cheaper, worst case scenario no friend involved, so around $800 a car.... (normally could be about $1k mark)

- Just a bit hassle and waiting time around 2 weeks for each car.

But sourcing parts for 150 cars can be difficult tho... hehehe...

But if all went smooth, in the end we have -$8000+2500+800 = -$4300 (around $4k less a car than buying outright factory manual)

Not sure if my calculation is correct but would be very intriguing idea if it is.

Thanks for your info rs73.

I'm still tossing up wether to convert my R32 from auto to manwell.

I got a quote from JustJap $1200 for manual gearbox kit. But thats an RB20 box. The Rb25s are alot dearer.

I'm also tossing up whether to sell the car or do the conversion.

I'm happy with the looks of the car, just a few things pissing me off.

Eg, bubbles in the dash, vinyl coming away from passenger pillars, fuel consumption (20L/100) that should be fixed saturday. Hoping its the 02 Sensor causing the problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...