Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i got 172 with powerfc, exhaust, cooler, boost 12psi so i doubt youll get 200rwkw

is your ecu stock? cos the stock ecu has boost cut around 12psi which will just retard everything and drop your power figure, could be remapped?

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I pulled 163rwkw with standard intercooler and standard exhaust (only muffler) boosted at 12psi. Since then I have upgraded to HKS cooler and 3" exhaust all the way, haven't dyno'd it since then so I'm hoping I'll have around 175rwkw at a minimum.

My next big spend will go towards Power FC and large fuel pump and Z32, then I'll think about injector and cams.

Does anyone think my hopes are too high if I aim for 200rwkw with the above mods complete? Or should I take a different approach to my next few mods?

I already have an Exedy Heavy Duty Clutch (fair few K's done on it now) It seems to be working fine.

To give you a rough idea, I've got PFC, FMIC, EBC, 3" turbo back exhaust with hi-flow cat and K&N panel filter on my R33 and I achieved 194 rwkw on 12psi.

With the mods you've listed above, I have no reason to doubt that ~200rwkw is achievable.

EDIT: Paul's post above highlights the difference in dyno readings from different workshops and why they should be used as only an indication of power. Given that we've got similar mods on similar cars, a 20rwkw difference is a little irregular when I suspect that our cars are probably pretty much in line with performance. Depending on dyno used, i expect that anything between 180-200rwkw should be on the mark for the mods you've listed.

For the record, my dyno reading was on a dyno dynamics dynometer in shoot out mode.

I pulled 163rwkw with standard intercooler and standard exhaust (only muffler) boosted at 12psi. Since then I have upgraded to HKS cooler and 3" exhaust all the way, haven't dyno'd it since then so I'm hoping I'll have around 175rwkw at a minimum.

My next big spend will go towards Power FC and large fuel pump and Z32, then I'll think about injector and cams.

Does anyone think my hopes are too high if I aim for 200rwkw with the above mods complete? Or should I take a different approach to my next few mods?

I already have an Exedy Heavy Duty Clutch (fair few K's done on it now) It seems to be working fine.

I wouldnt bother with the fuel pump and Z32, spend the money on the power fc and you will be more than happy.

Hi Mason,  

 

Was that in shootout mode? Do you have a scan of the dyno printout? Just trying to find out why mine is 20kw less than yours with same mods

Hi Paul,

Yeah, it was in shootout mode. I've got the dyno sheet at home, so I'll try to scan it for you some time today or tomorrow.

I still think it's got more to do with the dyno's than anything else - although 20kw is a fair difference like you say.

Cheers,

Brenden

Actually, I just noticed in your signature that you ran 11psi, whilst I was running 12psi. That's more likely a reasonable explanation (with a small degree of dyno variation) for the difference in power figures.

As for the non-shootout mode, I'm not sure. The 3 times I've had my car on a dyno, it's always been in shootout_6 mode.

My car made 195rwkw with of 10.5 psi of boost with the mods listed bellow on a dyno dynamatics dyno. They said fuel pump and injectors and turbo where within safe limit's but if I where to add more boost ect. I would be at the limits. He also said the R33 gts25t are probably the value for money import to modify to this level. To go the next step many parts need to be upgraded making it expensive.

To go the next step I beleive I would need

ECU, injectors, fuel pump, airflow meter and turbo

Cams would be optional but they will make a big difference.

Munna, That is a higher than average figure for those mods on the usual Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne, QLD Dyno's.

195rwkw is usually (many many r33's) done with 11psi, powerfc, exhaust, fmic.

Your mods generally get around 180rwkw. But that being said 15rwkw is well within the dyno variation.

Munna, That is a higher than average figure for those mods on the usual Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne, QLD Dyno's.

 

195rwkw is usually (many many r33's) done with 11psi, powerfc, exhaust, fmic.

 

Your mods generally get around 180rwkw. But that being said 15rwkw is well within the dyno variation.

I have all of that exept Ive got a safc instead of a power FC (not of good I know) and .5 psi less boost but yeah the tuner said say it was a little higher than other cars they have tuned with similar mods.

Don't forget that these cars are all 10yrs old now so engine condition is going to be playing a part in power output figures. It's not like they are in pristine condition after just being rolled off the showroom floor.

correct... it's like roll the dice and see which power levels you come up with.

10% is normal, and what makes the difference between "woaa, those are good figures" and "that's about average". So the highest figure is about 190rkw +/- 10% .. and that has been proven time and time again.

Fair enough other things come into account too. Sometimes its not the dyno thats inaccurate if the tuner doesn't spend the time and take the care to put all the sensors in the correct positions ect results can be incorrect.

At the end of the day if you take your car to the same dyno each time and know that the tuner is not taking shortcuts when dynoing your car everytime. You should get a good reflection how much power your mods have given you.

Hi all,

I recently bought a buggered RB25 turbo and thinking of Hi-Flowing it.

I've heard mixed feelings about this from one or two people, however I'd

like an opinion from people who have done this before and have some results

to prove.

My current mods are FMIC, pod filter, Bleed Valve, BOV, 3" turbo-back exhaust.

From my own knowledge after bolting on a hi-flow I think it will be necessary to get an Apexi Power FC (or at a minimum an SAFC), probably a Z32 air flow meter and bigger fuel pump and possibly bigger injectors.  

Does that sound about right?

I aim for around 250rwkw but with a reliable set up that won't go KABOOM on me.

From peoples experience, is it possible to easily obtain 250rwkw with a hi-flow RB25 turbo?

And if it can reach 250rwkw, what other mods would I need to build up to around 300rwkw?

I'm thinking about getting a HKS actuator over the standard, would this benefit in gaining the power I'm aiming for?

Thanks for your help..

I have just gone through this very excercise myself:

Car does 220kwatw at the moment with a 400hp rated turbo,

which is max. safe capacity. Have already got fuel regulator, pump, hiflow injectors, intercooler and PFC etc. std manafold. wanted a simple bolt on turbo to get around 400hp so turbo had to be internally gated and rated at min. of 550hp. I use the car predominately for circuit (with the occassional qtr mile run)so needed quick boost with good mid range torque - start boost at 2000 and maxed by 4000 but pwr still climbing to 7000

Through several performance mechanics (guys who actually run and tune track cars) it came down to 2 choices

1. GT35/40R internally gated rated 700hp

The internally gated GT only comes in exhaust AR1.06 which could lag but would have great legs right up to the rev limit. Has ceramic ball bearings so if backfire could risk breaking the bearing. Otherwise a perfectly matched turbo for RB25DET

2. Std nissan turbo hiflowed rated 500hp

Quite a few shops are high flowing and struggling getting 350hp, so you need to ensure who ever does the high flow is the real deal and will g'tee 550hp. Which means the inlet and out let are widened and much tougher wheels, shaft and th a bush bearings.

Although the price for both was very similar and the temptaion was to go the new I went for the hiflow because:

- good track record on some quick GTRs

- smaller exhaust AR which means ON BOOST quicker

- 12mth warranty

- garaunteed bolt on componentry

- matched compressor flow capacity with exhaust so the turbo works at an optimum speed and the lowest temp while maintaining boost

This was my experience up to choosing the turbo. Its actually being installed this weekend and gets tuned in a week so I'll let you know how it goes.

Hope this helps. What I found was the more you ask the more confusing it gets - so get advice from someone who has got the RESULTS. Good luck

You will pay about $1950 for the hi-flow kit, which is the hi-flowing of the turbo, comes with all the gaskets you need. Except the dump pipe gasket as you need to keep that one. GCG do a great job and when you get your turbo back it looks brand new and it sounds great too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have no hard data to report, but I have to say, having driven it to work and back all week, mostly on wet roads (and therefore mostly not able to contemplate anything too outrageous anywhere)..... it is real good. I turned the boost controller on, with duty cycle set to 10% (which may not be enough to actually increase the boost), and the start boost set to 15 psi. That should keep the gate unpressurised until at least 15 psi. And rolling at 80 in 5th, which is <2k rpm, going to WOT sees the MAP go +ve even before it crosses 2k and it has >5 psi by the time it hits 90 km/h. That's still <<2.5k rpm, so I think it's actually doing really well. Because of all the not-quite-ideal things that have been in place since the turbo first went on, it felt laggy. It's actually not. The response appears to be as good as you could hope for with a highflow.
    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
×
×
  • Create New...