Jump to content
SAU Community

So I just fitted Kings and Bilsteins

GunMetalR33
 Share

Recommended Posts

GunMetalR33 Mentor

GunMetalR33

Posted
Posted

After fitting the new springs and shocks the cars feels really good one the road. I used to have problems with under steering cause to front was bouncing so much.

Just a couple of points for others to remeber when doing the same job.

1) Be prepared to spend the whole daying doing it.

2) It is an absolute pain in the a** of a job.

3) the back strut tower bolts are located under the parcel shelf and can be a huge pain to get to depending on your factory sterio option. I have factory splits in the back which had to be removed along with the seats and parcel shelf.

4) if you have a press it would be very handy for pressing on the bottom spring plates to the Bilstein shocks (I had to use the old persuader (hammer).

5) Make sure you have spring tentioners.

The rest is easy but frustrating :)

With this setup the guards are about 10mm from the tyres (with 18's) but may sag a little more. The ride seems to be nice and firm but not to firm...

Sorry if this thread seems pointless, I am still cooling of as I just finished it. I needed to vent :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70450-so-i-just-fitted-kings-and-bilsteins/
Share on other sites
siksII Grand Master

siksII

Posted
Posted

i put in whiteline springs and bilsteins a week ago,

it took about 45 mins to remove the coilovers..

i found it very easy (with a friend who had done it before) to put them him, the only problem was:

as you said, the bottom plate for the springs would not go on for the rear shocks. the fronts went on easy. i called whiteline they said it happens sometimes, and if there was a shart edge they sometimes need to grind it off..

There were no sharp edges, the hole was just too small!!

so we used to dremel to grind the hole out a bit more and them it all went well.

(i did try and use the 'persuader' at first :) )

all up fitting took about 4 hours including removing and refitting the interior.. the whiteline springs didnt need to be compressed to fit in..

GunMetalR33 Mentor

GunMetalR33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
How much did it set you back? Looking at getting some to do mine shortly.

Well I payed $1000 for the bilsteins and $320 for the kings. I got the kings from capital steering & suspension and the socks from pedders. I had to haggle a bit with pedders to get the shocks for $1000...

siksII Grand Master

siksII

Posted
Posted

you can get the whiteline sports pack (springs and shocks) from UAS with sau discount.. comes to around ~1215

but can add up to more once u buy dust covers if needed (i got 4 new ones) which are not cheap, around 20-25 each

NYL83R Proficient

NYL83R

Posted
Posted
I used the low ones which are supposed to lower the car 35mm at most. You have the option of standard, low and super low. But I would not go the super lows because it would cause camber probs....

Yeah i am looking at geting the "low" springs

How does your car sit now? do you have a pic?

siksII Grand Master

siksII

Posted
Posted
is the UAS discount only for NSW members? Or being a Vic member, can i apply for the discount?

how you finding the springs/shocks anyway siksII?

cheers.

Hey, im pretty sure its just for forum members too ie. just mention sau and they will see what they can do, speak to john(boss)

the springs and shocks are just what i was hoping for, car rolls less and is a lot easier to drive, ride is similar to standard ride.

only complaint is the front end feels less precise and stuck, although u do get some stabilising understeer before the tail comes out, so plenty of warning..

also when the front/rear comes out they slide nice and smooth, just overall making the car easy to drive, especially on bumpy(ALL) roads

i used to have coilovers and there is no way i could have rounded corners as quick or as stable as i do now..

siksII Grand Master

siksII

Posted
Posted
Did you consider just getting new coils made for your coilovers rather than buy whole new suspension???? Much cheaper option. Obviously depends on the condition/quality of the coilovers.

hey, i considered this, but decided against it, i wanted a very good setup, and dont have the knowledge, and dont really trust suspension places to make up a set of springs to suit the shocks that would work as well as the whiteline setup

so basically i wanted a minimum of stuffing around, also my alloy tops were very noisy, so i needed to get rid of them anyway, they annoyed me!

i sold my coilovers for around $500 so in the end it only cost about 800 (1300 all up)

for springs, shocks, strut tops(from a forum member), bump stops, and new dust covers

i installed myself otherwise that would have been maybe an extra 250 or so.

  • 1 month later...
Sciby Experienced

Sciby

Posted
Posted

I'm on this path too, already have the Bilsteins installed, although they've been working too hard with the shit springs, so I suspect they'll need a service soon... I just rang Repco for a quote on King Springs low's, and they said $220 for front AND back springs, with $10 freight... that sounds... wrong.

Anyone confirm or deny that pricing? :P

Sciby Experienced

Sciby

Posted
Posted

Nah, he said $110 for each set, meaning $220 all up... but maybe its more the truth, considering you feel that $440 would be too expensive.

I gave the Repco on the other side of town a call, they said $161 for the fronts, and the rears weren't in their catalogue. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...