Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys my mate just bought an R34 non turbo with the idea of putting a big combo into it and making big power.(up to 450wrkw).

I suggested useing the RB 30 bottom end and using the GTR head.he has heard of putting the neo head on!

as for turbo/s (he wants an external wastegate).I would use a set of 2835's as he wants to use the car for circut work as well.i would think that with the 3L and the work done to the engine it should come onto boost around 4500 i would think mayby sooner.

any ideas with turbo combos and engine set up would be great.

Cheers BEN

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70713-which-head-to-use-on-rb30det/
Share on other sites

Hi guys my mate just bought an R34 non turbo with the idea of putting a big combo into it and making big power.(up to 450wrkw).

I suggested useing the RB 30 bottom end and using the GTR head.he has heard of putting the neo head on!

as for turbo/s (he wants an external wastegate).I would use a set of 2835's as he wants to use the car for circut work as well.i would think that with the 3L and the work done to the engine it should come onto boost around 4500 i would think mayby sooner.

any ideas with turbo combos and engine set up would be great.

Cheers BEN

He's obviously not worried about $ so the GTR head would be the best way to go but there are some slight modifications that need to be done when mating the GTR head with the 3L block. If your going to go aftermarket turbos then why not just go for one large highmount one? Its much easier to set up and is probably cheaper too. But when looking for 450rwkws hes going to have to look into some body strengthening too as producing 450rwks and being able to use 450rwks is 2 completely different things especially in a RWD.

Just some things to think about sorry i couldnt help with the specific details you are after :)

When i said 2835's i meant in hight mount configuration.

Also i spoke to CRD and they said that the torque you gain down low is not worth the revs you loose up top.

any coments.

Its got everything to do with airflow. The extra torque at low rpms is nice.

That depends on where you plan the rev the rb25 or rb26.

An RB30 making power to 7500rpm may push say 52.8 lb/s of air.

To match that same 52.8 lb/s of air the 2.5ltr would have to rev to 8650rpm.

How many RB's do you see making their peak power at 8650rpm. :cheers: Not many.

The higher you rev a motor the higher the power loss is through friction.

Obviously the lower reving motor is more efficient at making its power.

Besides the point, a set of cams to rev the 2.5ltr and make its peak airflow (power) figure at 8650rpm would have to be pretty wild and unstreetable.

Be sure to stiffen up the bottom end (crank girdle) if you are going to be reving the 3ltr to 8500rpm. Thats fairly insane RPM.

Not even the Gibson Motorsport GTR rev'd its RB26 that hard.

They found the rebuild frequency was very high over 7000-7500rpm.

You are probably better off running more boost and keeping the rpm lower.

If you run out of effiency running the higher boost step the turbo's up a size.

Depends how often you like the rebuild motors.

The Benifit of the 3ltr is for any given RPM its always going to be pushing more air. Take this in to consideration when selecting the turbine a/r.

With the right cams and turbo specs its always going to be making more power.

600hp,

What were you planning on reving the rb25 or 26 to????

3ltr to 8500rpm is like reving the rb25 or 26 to 10,200rpm.

3ltr to 7500rpm = rb25 or 26 to 9000rpm.

Race_Snooze,

The RB26DETT head and R32 RB25DE N/A head are the easiest to fit.

The R32 RB25 head simply bolts up.

The RB26DETT head needs to have the block headbolt holes enlarged and retapped.

The R33 RB25 head needs to have the vct's oil galley in the head welded up, then an oil feed from the oil pressure sender to the vct supplied.

Bit of a pain in the arse but the slightly extra mid range is worth while if you are sticking with relatively stock cams (up to 260duration).

Edit: I guess thes got answered -  

1. How hard is to mate the GTR head to the RB30 block?  

2. Also, what compression would you get with the RB26 head and RB30 block combo?

1. Easy, no mods required, other than drill and tap the block for the 12 mm RB26 head bolts, RB20/25/30 are 11 mm. We use 12.5 mm ARP head studs for their higher clamping pressure.

2. Depends on what pistons you use, what head gasket and how much you polish the combustion chambers. I have seen compression ratios from 7.5 to 1 to 13.5 to 1.

If he is REALLY going to use it for circuit work, then ~ 650 bhp would be my target. We have found it very difficult to get more than that to the ground in a 2wd application. And we have very sophisticated shock absorbers, adjustable anti roll, anti dive, anti squat, caster camber and toe and a larger selection of spring rates.

The main problem however, is response. Over 650 bhp even in a 3.1 litre, gets very difficult to tune for the rapid throttle response necessary for running decent and consistent lap times. Even at that power level, driving it fast requires considerable skill and experience.

:D

600hp,

What were you planning on reving the rb25 or 26 to????

3ltr to 8500rpm is like reving the rb25 or 26 to 10,200rpm.

3ltr to 7500rpm = rb25 or 26 to 9000rpm.

 

Race_Snooze,

The RB26DETT head and R32 RB25DE N/A head are the easiest to fit.

The R32 RB25 head simply bolts up.

The RB26DETT head needs to have the block headbolt holes enlarged and retapped.

 

The R33 RB25 head needs to have the vct's oil galley in the head welded up, then an oil feed from the oil pressure sender to the vct supplied.

Bit of a pain in the arse but the slightly extra mid range is worth while if you are sticking with relatively stock cams (up to 260duration).

Cheers.

1. Easy, no mods required, other than drill and tap the block for the 12 mm RB26 head bolts, RB20/25/30 are 11 mm.  We use 12.5 mm ARP head studs for their higher clamping pressure.

2. Depends on what pistons you use, what head gasket and how much you polish the combustion chambers.  I have seen compression ratios from 7.5 to 1 to 13.5 to 1.

If he is REALLY going to use it for circuit work, then ~ 650 bhp would be my target.  We have found it very difficult to get more than that to the ground in a 2wd application.  And we have very sophisticated shock absorbers, adjustable anti roll, anti dive, anti squat, caster camber and toe and a larger selection of spring rates.  

The main problem however, is response.  Over 650 bhp even in a 3.1 litre, gets very difficult to tune for the rapid throttle response necessary for running decent and consistent lap times.  Even at that power level, driving it fast requires considerable skill and experience.

:D

For a reliable street setup:

For the argument sake, if you could get a RB26 head at the same price as the R32 RB25de head which one would you use and why?

What compression ratio would you aim for and (if not stock) what pistons and head gasket would you use to achive that?

What would be a reasonable power target?

:)

2. Depends on what pistons you use, what head gasket and how much you polish the combustion chambers.  I have seen compression ratios from 7.5 to 1 to 13.5 to 1.:D

If the bowls of the head are polished to a mirror finish, would this benefit a compression of approx 8.8:1?

The pistons are ARIAS rb30 forgies to suit the twin cam head (25 VVT). The pistons and valves have been ceramic coated.

The bowls in the head had some "pitting" around all of the inlet valve areas of the bowls, I assume this was from detonation (head came of a worn bottom end). These "pits" were smoothed out and polished to a mirror finish, the bowls are yet to be cc'd.

Doing this to the bowls would lower the comp slightly? (head gasket hasnt been chosen yet).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...