Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have verified ALL HICAS signal wire functions, colors, and pin assignments. I also have a system schematic drawn in the R34 PDF format...much easier to read than the R33 schematic. Right now it is hand-drawn, but I will whip up an electronic one soon enough. Big thanks to Alex Au on SDU for letting me have the Super HICAS steering chapter for the R33...I won't be giving out the the chapter, but my custom schematic is easier to read and has much more info.

I have taken photos of the HICAS control module PCB's as well...maybe I can get some feedback on what you think you see. There are two big IC's with the same part numbers, but different "labels" (they have stickers on them with more ID numbers). I am trying to figure out where the yaw sensor is (be it a piezo gyro or the like) but it doesn't seem to be very obvious. I'll try to post pics later tonight...well, in the morning for you guys...

I have also obtained SAE documents on the Super HICAS system...it is VERY in depth (control algorithms are explained, system schematics) but it only covers the pre-electrical system, and no yaw-rate feedback systems are explained. However, it is very obvious that any type of yaw data fed back into the control parameters would greatly enhance the responsiveness and accuracy of the system. In addition to the SAE article, I have also obtained 2 patents for the HICAS 4WS system...once again, no electrical / yaw systems are mentioned, but it is extremely in-depth. All the articles are dated 1991 or earlier, and I couldn't find any HICAS information after those dates. I guess all the modifications to the system were kept in-house at Nissan and not disclosed.

Did you know that Nissan engineers wanted to incorporate a "Mild" and "Sport" setting for HICAS back in early '90? I didn't...it made me realize that Nissan must have made compromises to the system...it could be way more responsive, as the control algothims show a big difference in some of the constants used to compute the steering angles. Crazy stuff...

And if you are wondering why I am even doing this, well, I am going to install the yaw-rate feedback electric HICAS on my NA 300ZX. Don't flame...I have ALL hardware, and have already drawn the necessary schematics to integrate the system into my zed...power supply, fusing, relays, signal wires, etc, etc. I have also designed a custom wiring harness (nothing hardwired here...using AMP connectors). I am also going to incorporate my own "HICAS lock" by installing a switch for the HICAS system power...I can turn it off at will...EVERY part of the system, not just the actuator. This will come in handy if I have to drive on crap roads, gravel, or if I just don't want the thing on. Also, the way I designed the harness, it will be really easy to diagnose any missing or busted inputs.

I guess the big question is "Why??", and all I can say is "because I can" hahaha

PCB pics soon, as well as the schematics for you R33 guys that need some diagnostic info...

:O

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow, great progress. The body of HICAS knowledge has just been hugely increased thanks to your efforts!

AFAIK the electrically actuated HICAS was introduced with the R33 series (and 94+ 300ZX's?), it may be that when they redesigned the system to use the electrical actuation the yaw-rate feedback stuff was introduced at the same time? May explain why your pre-91 documentation doesn't mention it.

Putting the electric HICAS into your 300ZX - sounds like a very interesting project!

Cam, big effort. I think you may do ok with the electric HICAS as the motor and gearing should have enough feedback torque to resist movement when it is switched off/locked. There may still be a small amount of slop but that would be fairly small.

Regardless how clever Nissan tried to be, the fact remains that every track driver who has locked HICAS considers their handling more predictable after locking.

Do it because you can. I suppport you all the way and good luck.

Wow, great progress. The body of HICAS knowledge has just been hugely increased thanks to your efforts!

AFAIK the electrically actuated HICAS was introduced with the R33 series (and 94+ 300ZX's?), it may be that when they redesigned the system to use the electrical actuation the yaw-rate feedback stuff was introduced at the same time? May explain why your pre-91 documentation doesn't mention it.

Putting the electric HICAS into your 300ZX - sounds like a very interesting project!

Yea, the electric HICAS was introduced in the '94 Z32's...but the system was not the same as the R33's. The control modules looked completely different, and there was never any mention of "yaw-rate" anything. What is even more strange to me is that they NEVER used the HICAS system from the Skyline in the Z32...they just stuck to the original system, albeit electric in later models.

Cam, big effort. I think you may do ok with the electric HICAS as the motor and gearing should have enough feedback torque to resist movement when it is switched off/locked. There may still be a small amount of slop but that would be fairly small.

Regardless how clever Nissan tried to be, the fact remains that every track driver who has locked HICAS considers their handling more predictable after locking.

Do it because you can. I suppport you all the way and good luck.

Thanks for the complement...I agree with you, I should be ok with the HICAS actuator disabled as long as I don't drive too hard. From what I have read, most guys that do this get away with it without too many problems. Of course, I would only do it when necessary, and I could turn it on immediately...

As for your comments on HICAS and track use...I agree totally with what you said. Everything I have read (and personally felt) about HICAS was that the system was designed to give superior handling (high & low speed) on the street. Quick, high speed lane-change maneuvers, high speed stability, and more precise handling at moderate speeds (backroads anyone? :uh-huh: ) was what it was designed to augment. I wouldn't drive with HICAS on a track either...the actuators aren't fast enough, and the software just isn't written for the track environment.

It might be a month or so until I finish the schematics, but when I get them done I'll post them in a dedicated thread. Hopefully it will alleviate some HICAS woes...at least you will know where to look, and what wires to check.

Ok, last post for today, but I ran into some really interesting info...I found more patents from Nissan that pertains to HICAS...electric HICAS...as well as another patent that dives in to the mathmatical models used. Here are links for the brave ;)

"Vehicle Motion Control Apparatus"

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5957987.h...ghlight=5957987

"Vehicle Steer Angle System Based Upon Mathematical Model"

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4840389.h...ghlight=4840389

I have hardcopies of the following:

"Four Wheel Steer Control System"

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4893690.h...ghlight=4893690

Development of "Super Hicas"--A New Rear Wheel Steering System With Phasereversal Control

http://www.sae.org/servlets/productDetail?...&PROD_CD=891978

Steering control system for wheeled vehicle

Contains info on the "Mild" and "Sporty" modes

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4949261.h...ghlight=4949261

Be sure to check out the Patent References as well...most are linked to similar systems by Nissan.

Now for pics of the HICAS control module PCB's:

http://share.shutterfly.com/osi.jsp?i=EeAM2TdizcOHDgw

Just follow the link and click "view pictures"...you can view them individually or as a slide show.

For the curious, here are the part numbers to the two big IC's you see in the pics

Left IC

Sticker

19US

80

31022

Right IC

Sticker

19UM

80

31022

ID info on BOTH IC's

3K1 J

HD6475328CP10 Japan

Now, after reading all this info, pouring over schematics, and seeing the PCB first hand, I am in serious doubt (arrgh...again) as to the use of a "real" yaw rate sensor. There seems to be quite a bit of "feedback" (my god how many times have I said that word LOL...) of the orignial yaw-rate calculatons into other parts of the program AFTER the steering angle has been calculated...somewhat of a "check" in the system without sensor input...I might have that wrong...I dunno. Don't get me wrong, I don't feel as if I know everything about this system...really, the more I read the less I realize I know :)

But hey, makes for a fun summer project before school kicks up again!

Enjoy the info, and I look forward to any comments!

;)

The HD6475328CP10 semiconductor is a 16 bit microprocessor made by HITACHI...there are two of them on the R33 HICAS module.

Datasheet:

http://www.digchip.com/datasheets/parts/da...475328-CP10.php

I'm not seeing any piezo gyros or anything that could detect yaw motion...it must be recycling the calculations to fine-tune the output...???

Found this on Nissan Japan's website, for the R34:

ch_a3_h.jpg

The picture is titled: Yaw-Rate Feedback Electromotive SUPER HICAS System Figure

It seems there really IS a yaw-rate sensor feeding data to the HICAS control unit...please note the cylinder-shaped object directly above the right-rear wheel.

By using an online translator, I have been able to determine that the caption for this "sensor" pictured above the right-rear wheel is a yaw sensor. The text comes to within 2 characters of a direct translation (English to Japanese) of "yaw sensor":

English: Yaw Sensor

Japanese: ヨーイングセンサー

Compare to the text displayed within the diagram

This diagram displays an undisputable implementation of a yaw sensor of some type, feeding the HICAS system directly.

After seeing this diagram I am even more confused as to how the system works...every schematic I have gotten my hands on (both R33 and R34) do NOT show ANY "yaw sensor" inputs of any kind going into the HICAS control module. That is why I assumed that the sensor must be on the PCB's themselves, but after a very thorough examination of the PCB's, there is obviously NO sensor of any type...I thought I had this cracked! :confused:

Opinions???

BTW...the two white boxes seem to represent the "target states" of the vehicle's yaw motion. The top box seems to be the "ideal" model (i.e. steering angle, vehicle speed) while the bottom box seems to be the more complex of the two. It looks like it takes the result of the first calculation, and feeds it into the second calculation, as well as taking into account the vehicle speed and steering angle once more. Finally, it takes the actual yaw motion of the vehicle via the yaw sensor and compares it to what was desired. I guess some type of really complex subtraction takes place to see what needs to be reduced or added (for the rear-steering angle)...OK, enough...LOL

Interesting movie for HICAS:

http://www.nissan.co.jp/STAGEA/M35/0408/ME...ECHA/main2.html

FYI, I also finished my schematics for the HICAS interface with my zed...should start wiring next weekend...woohoo!!

:D

Does anyone know where the HICAS gets the VSS line from in a R32 GTR? Cause wire 53 has conectivity, but i want to test from the ECU to the HICAS unit, so if I could find what wire to test that would be great.

Does anyone know where the HICAS gets the VSS line from in a R32 GTR? Cause wire 53 has conectivity, but i want to test from the ECU to the HICAS unit, so if I could find what wire to test that would be great.

I am not familiar with how the R32's system is set up...but I am trying to understand what you want to do. Is wire 53 on the ECU or HICAS control module?

You are right though...if you can verify the continuity between the HICAS control module and ECU, then you can rule out busted wires.

I have tested between the speedo and wire 53 on the ECU (commenly cut to get around 180k limit). But I want to test the link between the ECU and HICAS unit, and there is alot of wires to test, the Z32 should have the same HICAS unit (Z32 and R32 share afew parts) do you know what wire on the HICAS unit the speed sensor is?

It seems there really IS a yaw-rate sensor feeding data to the HICAS control unit...please note the cylinder-shaped object directly above the right-rear wheel.

After seeing this diagram I am even more confused as to how the system works...every schematic I have gotten my hands on (both R33 and R34) do NOT show ANY "yaw sensor" inputs of any kind going into the HICAS control module. That is why I assumed that the sensor must be on the PCB's themselves, but after a very thorough examination of the PCB's, there is obviously NO sensor of any type...I thought I had this cracked! :confused:

Opinions???

My thoughts, that "sensor" looks a lot like a stylized control motor on the hicas unit, and the hicas has a couple of pot style position sensors on it. Maybe they consider the rear steering angle to be the yaw rate when related to speed.

I have tested between the speedo and wire 53 on the ECU (commenly cut to get around 180k limit).  But I want to test the link between the ECU and HICAS unit, and there is alot of wires to test, the Z32 should have the same HICAS unit (Z32 and R32 share afew parts) do you know what wire on the HICAS unit the speed sensor is?

Here you go:

http://300zx-twinturbo.com/cgi-bin/manual....efault&total=98

hope this helps...and as far as I know, the Z32 and R32 systems are the same (??)

Good luck with the conversion.

Considering your intended purpose and the rest, people would be foolish in wanting to knock you for installing a better HICAS system onto your car. If you're primarily street driving, the extra handling response and stability would be great. Not to mention a smaller turning circle for parking ;)

After watching your Stagea link, though, I was once again reminded of the nice AWD driveline in the 35's. Just wondering how much it'd cost to fit the AWD and HICAS system out of the Stagea / Skyline into a Z33. :D Couple that with a TT kit and I'll go hunting Porsches.

My thoughts, that "sensor" looks a lot like a stylized control motor on the hicas unit, and the hicas has a couple of pot style position sensors on it. Maybe they consider the rear steering angle to be the yaw rate when related to speed.

That is a good point...I didn't really take into account the diagram is really just an advertisement on how the system works...not a real world setup and definately not a REAL system diagram. Funny thing is that you should mention this now...I considered that the rear steering angle sensors might be utilized for yaw calculations, but I just assumed they were used for motor control feedback. Another reason is because the Z32 has a similar actuator (electric of course), and it has two rear-steering angle sensors as well (steering angle main and sub-sensor). I thought "Why use these sensors when Nissan can design a control unit with gyros, etc"

Well, this patent made me think different:

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?...=hicas&RS=hicas

Quote from above patent

"In the instant embodiment the variable steering characteristic controller 19 can take the form of the rear wheel auxiliary steering device which is referred to as "Super HICAS" and which is disclosed in Nissan Skyline RS32 type vehicle Service Manual No. 622 pages C-97 to C-104 (published in May 1989) and English language publication entitled: NISSAN SUPER HICAS (EO-2000-8908). "

This statement means nothing until you realize that the patent I just linked is for a Traction Control System that is spec'd to use either rate gyros or g-sensors to detect deviations from the desired path.

This patent is really for a "Yaw-Rate Feedback" Traction Control System...if HICAS is indeed substituted, then you have "Yaw-Rate Feedback" HICAS.

And what is a major problem with the older HICAS? In some situations it begins to produce understeer, because there is no way for the HICAS system to recognize if the "target yaw rate" is being held. Read the abstract for the above patent:

"In order to prevent a traction control system and an auxiliary steering or the like from combining stabilizing effects in a manner which causes excessive understeer, when the traction control is functioning in a predetermined manner, a signal is issued to the auxiliary steering control and reduces the gain with which the control thereof is implemented. As a result excessive understeer is avoided while maintaining suitable vehicle stability."

Now, this is what changed my thinking as to how Nissan would gather Yaw data:

"It is further possible to use the outputs of the wheel speed sensors and to derive the vehicle yaw rate in place of the rate gyro 17 if so desired. In addition, it is possible to use the difference between the actual and target yaw rates for feedback control purposes and use the same to derive the duty cycles of the signals which are used to modify the amount of torque which is permitted to be transmitted to each of the driven road wheels and thus enable the division of drive torque therebetween to be controlled."

So, they outline using either G-sensors, Gyros, or the wheel speed sensors to derive the vehicles actual yaw-rate. They don't mention using any type of rear-angle sensors, but knowing that there are NOT two distinct wheel-speed inputs into the HICAS control module leads me to believe that another method must have been used. The simple fact that so many methods were proposed to compute yaw rate, right down to using wheel speed sensors, makes me realize that the engineers were pretty open to using any option available to gather that data...this proves that they did not limit themselves to using expensive gyros.

Whew...enough typing, but I seem to be closing in on how this system works. Maybe someday HICAS won't be such a big mystery...

;)

Good luck with the conversion.

Considering your intended purpose and the rest, people would be foolish in wanting to knock you for installing a better HICAS system onto your car. If you're primarily street driving, the extra handling response and stability would be great. Not to mention a smaller turning circle for parking ;)

After watching your Stagea link, though, I was once again reminded of the nice AWD driveline in the 35's. Just wondering how much it'd cost to fit the AWD and HICAS system out of the Stagea / Skyline into a Z33. :D Couple that with a TT kit and I'll go hunting Porsches.

lol...that would be pretty sweet. I have no clue as to how much that would cost...just finding the parts would be hard enough. I haven't seen too many G35x's running around, let alone wrecked already. Does the Stagea have the FM platform as well? I didn't know that. An AWD/4WS TT Z33 would definately kill some Porsche's, and maybe a Ferrari or two :D

From the pictures of the suspension that they have posted (which admittedly is only from the "outside" shot) its identical to a Z33's. Which means there should be clearance to run those front driveshafts. The Stagea has always traditionally been a "Skyline wagon", so them sharing the same platform isn't unsurprising.

Of course, there's the small matter of if there's enough room for the driveshafts and turbochargers, since I'd hazard to guess that they'd be attempting to occupy the same space.

The APS TT kit on a RWD Z33 puts out 300rwkW, which is about what a 996 Turbo makes at the flywheel. Unless the Nissan ET-S system and twin turbo kit weighs a lot more than the 50kg difference between the Z33 and 996, the Nissan would still have a power advantage.

It'd probably cost 996 Turbo money to get it all sorted and reliable, though, but it would wipe the smirk off a lot of Euro car owner's faces.

*sigh* If only my dreams were as attainable as your dream of upgrading your HICAS. ;)

lol...that would be pretty sweet. I have no clue as to how much that would cost...just finding the parts would be hard enough. I haven't seen too many G35x's running around, let alone wrecked already. Does the Stagea have the FM platform as well? I didn't know that. An AWD/4WS TT Z33 would definately kill some Porsche's, and maybe a Ferrari or two :)

The WGC34 Stagea (96 - 01) is based on the C34 Laurel platform, which is also the basis for the R33 platform. Drivetrain is basically the R33 system.

The M35 Stagea (01 - current) is essentially just a wagon version of the V35 Skyline/G35. So platform is identical AFAIK.

If my impression of the new GTR rumours are correct, then it will answer your prayers - will basically be a TT (engine displacement still unknown) V35 (probably V36 by the time it comes out) coupe with the ATTESA and maybe HICAS as well..... :):)

Re the yaw sensor stuff - you're making my head hurt again..... Haven't had time to wade my way thru the links you've posted, but when I do I'll post up my thoughts...

I thought you'd cracked it with the fact it might use discrepancy in individual rear wheel speeds to derive the yaw rate - very clever. But you're right, only 1 VSS input - doh!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...