Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks SK,

Is that 475hp x .75 = 350kw at the fly? Allowing for losses atw that would equate to the 280 rwkw you mentioned.

Good, your calculator works the same as mine, which I have checked by running the engine up on the engine dyno and the chassis dyno. Can't afford to have an unverified calculator.

Your comment that 'anything over 475 hp costs the same' makes sense.

No only makes sense, but is in fact true.

But assuming the $ for a bullet proof engine aren't available and if a stock RB26 can make 280rwkw safely, why go to an RB26/30 except for a bit more torque (and a fair bit more messing about to install it). Is it the cost? What am I missing?    

I would never suggest taking a perfectly good RB26 out and replacing it with a standard internals RB30. That would be pretty damn silly. But if you have an RB20, or an RB25, or a badly stuffed RB26 bottom end, then it makes perfect sense. It will cost less and give a much higher average power.

What rpm limit do you observe for the stocker bottom end?

Irrelevant question really, the limit is 475 bhp, so reving a standard internals RB30 over 6,500 rpm is a waste of time. And they make so much average power (at that max power level) it is actually slowing the car's acceleration by reving it too far. Around 7,000 rpm is OK and 7,500 rpm, if it is balanced well. But if it is still making power at 7,000 rpm, then it is making over 600 bhp and you have exceeded the 475 bhp limit anyway.

Hope that answered your questions:cheers:

ok so say i still want to stick to the ol rb20 style engine but use gtr crank and rods to make it a 2.4...

what else am i looking at internally to reliably run 260-300rwkw?

deffinately going to be a limiter hitting engine as its being built for drift purposes...

- adz

4AGZE pistons are factory forged so they should be ok if the tune is good id think.

Rods and crank are ok, just get it all balanced up, and use a builder who knows his stuff :(

Sorry Scooby just want to add my 2c:

SK:

Good, your calculator works the same as mine, which I have checked by running the engine up on the engine dyno and the chassis dyno. Can't afford to have an unverified calculator.

I think he was trying to clarify if it was 475 fly or atw, I don't believe your original post specified. But he should probably make sure he keeps that calc if it agrees with your dyno LOL! J/K

I would never suggest taking a perfectly good RB26 out and replacing it with a standard internals RB30. That would be pretty damn silly.

I was considering doing exactly that given the support I've read for this conversion, the apparently low cost and the impressive results people such as 88 (above) achieve. But I think I'm clear on that now.

Irrelevant question really, the limit is 475 bhp, so reving a standard internals RB30 over 6,500 rpm is a waste of time. And they make so much average power (at that max power level) it is actually slowing the car's acceleration by reving it too far. Around 7,000 rpm is OK and 7,500 rpm, if it is balanced well. But if it is still making power at 7,000 rpm, then it is making over 600 bhp and you have exceeded the 475 bhp limit anyway.

I didn't think it was that irrelevant given the discussion that sometimes surrounds rev limits for the RB26/30 but there is no question in my mind now.

Thanks SK :(

  • 2 months later...

I too would like to go the 2.2 or 2.4ltr option.....

I have heard that the RB20 rev's to some spastic Redline!

Another thing is..... I dunno if you guys are with me but i could not sacrifice the soud of my car for more power! How dramatically did the sound change with theses engines?

my redline on my rb30det with the std rb25de non turbo cams still makes power till up to 7000rpm. The redline is set to 7200....a set of cams and it can still rev like my old rb20 did, but it has more power now off boost than the rb20 did on.....gimme a pm some time, and ill show you if you like ;)

Simply slapping more cubes under the same head (valve & cam size etc) will cause the motor to rev less.

It will make its peak power earlier and drop power earlier resulting in the feeling of it doesn't want to rev out as much.

The RB25 head has bigger ports and valves, this will result in a motor that wants to rev harder than your 2.4ltr under a rb20det head that has 5mm per inlet valve less diamater.

Over both valves thats a 10mm diamater difference. No wonder the rb20det valves look like little baby toy valves next to the rb25 head. ;)

For drift that often see's over rev's I would seriously look at getting yourself a R32 RB25DE block, GTR pistons (possibly forged), rods and crank, adapt the piston oil squirters if you are going to use stock pistons.

It will be a much much better drift motor vs the rb23/rb24det.

It will rev harder, spool earlier and make more average and peak power. Not to mention it will be much more reliable as you wont need massive cams and huge rev's to make the power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
×
×
  • Create New...