Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

okay so i today i bolted my crank and new pistons back in, and measured the deck clearance. by this i mean piston edge to block face clearance. it was zero, in other words the piston edges at TDC were exactly level with the top of the block.

i looked at my RB25 head, and noticed that the combustion chambers don't appear to have large squish areas. the only apparent squish areas i could see are the lateral (side to side, not front to back) edges of the combustion chamber, where it is exactly level with the head face. the closest recess after these (to the piston) is the lateral border of the combustion chamber but it is 2.5 mm or so from deck height, which is way too far for a conventional squish setup of 40 thou.

so my questions are:

1) do i set the quench (squish) up using just these areas as a reference guide? in other words, do i set up the clearance from piston edge deck height to the head face as 40 thou?

2) what thickness is a fully torqued down genuine nissan head gasket? (obviously need to know this so i can figure out the quench!)

cheers,

-Stocky

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72033-rb2530-and-quench/
Share on other sites

Stock new pistons? Have you taken measurements for the comp ratio?

The quench area is the flat part of the combustion chamber that is level with the rest of the head plane.

I actually thought it was quite large for a 4valve head, there isn't really any room for more quench.

The RB20DET head has almost zero quench area.

stock pistons with standard bore size will give me anywhere betwen 8.2 and 8.9 compression ratio, which i am happy with.

i thought as much with the squish area, but i thought it would have been larger. maybe i'm just optimistic and have looked at too many motorbike engines :cheers:

no worries, i can calculate the quench off the head clearance without any problems.

any ideas on RB30 head gasket thickness?

It's the area round the edge of the head where the pistons come close at TDC. The relatively cooler surfaces 'quench' the mixture to prevent detonation. The high HP GTR engines (according to an American engine builder living in Japan) remove both 'quench' blocks from the head, and for mid-power engines the one on the inlet side is removed and the exhaust side is radiused. He claims they are only for turbulence generation, not for quench. There are some decent head pics on Hybridz.org under the RB Engines forum.

Thats what quench does.

Swirls or creates turbulence that cools hot spots, mixes the charge better and also squeezes it towards the central spark plug.

Quench is designed more so for low/mid range as it isn't as critical in the higher rpm's.

But as we all know average power is where its at.

If it wasn't why would we bother with the rb30det over the rb25det or even the rb20det. :)

squish or quench is very important at all engine speeds, look at formula 1 heads and pistons, or any high reving bike engine, its mechanical octane. Removing the squish band from rb heads just increases the surface area of what is already a large deep chamber, id be adding in squish and biasing it to the exhaust side to increase the burn speed and reduce trapped end gases which cause detanation. (rb30 head gasket is 55 thou. will crush to 50)

  • 1 month later...

This seems like a good thread to ask my question.

I have a stock NEO RB25 and want to run more boost. Tuner says put a thicker head gasket in to lower the compression ratio. I say, pull some timing from the tune and I don't need to.

Sydneykid says, "Personally I don't believe in thick head gaskets, they cause other problems."

I think he is referring to the change in quench/squish (Are these terms completely interchangable?).

Does that sound right?

What exactly will be the effect on quench if I put a thicker head gasket in? How is this bad?

Sorry for so many questions. As soon as you learn enough about turbos along comes quench and who knows what next! I've only just started looking at spark plugs...

sweet, 50 thou, no worries mate! now i can deck the block and head by a combined 10 thou and get my flat 40 thou of quench.  

cheers!

The standard head gasket should give you the correct amount of squish, as designed by Nissan. ie; you should not have to deck the block or the cylinder head.

This seems like a good thread to ask my question.

I have a stock NEO RB25 and want to run more boost. Tuner says put a thicker head gasket in to lower the compression ratio. I say, pull some timing from the tune and I don't need to.

Sydneykid says, "Personally I don't believe in thick head gaskets, they cause other problems."

I think he is referring to the change in quench/squish (Are these terms completely interchangable?).

Does that sound right?

What exactly will be the effect on quench if I put a thicker head gasket in? How is this bad?

Sorry for so many questions. As soon as you learn enough about turbos along comes quench and who knows what next! I've only just started looking at spark plugs...

I have seen more than one engine develop more detonation after a thicker head gasket was installed. Squish is one reason for this, the other is the thick (metallic) head gasket itself creates hot spots. Potentially all around the combustion chamber circumference. Not a good idea.

I would much rather spend the same amount of money (as a thich head gasket costs) removing restrictions, rather than increase the boost to make more power. If you MUST reduce the compression ratio, then polishing the combustion chamber gives a better result for the same cost.

;)

well i measured the head gasket from nissan with a micrometer and got 47 thou, assuming 5-10 thou crush the squish was just perfect with a deck height of zero. so i told the machinist to face the block, but take as little off as humanly possible. i think he took of 2 thou which is just about right for me ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd be very surprised if you can buy new OEM mats. But if you can, I want some too!  Do you have links to the variations you found? Also, where are you located? I found that Nengun is happy to list items to purchase but when you do buy them you'll get an email that it's actually discontinued. As far as I know the variations in floor mats are different colour schemes as well as automatic and manual having a slightly different shape. The automatic ones fit into a manual car without issues, but I think you'd have trouble fitting the other way around. I have photos that show the shape difference if you care. FWIW I bought sets of used floor mats in decent condition at yahoo auctions.
    • Hi 🙋‍♂️. Just bought my Unicorn but the interior need some minor work so it would match my expectations ;). I noticed it is hard to get used oem floor mats in good condition so i started to dig if there's any chance to buy set of new ones. I found two websites - nengun and amayama and it looks like one can still buy factory new floor mats in Japan, but thers a small issue. Some mats (i assume genuine, oem ones) are marked as G4900 and these are "discontinued". The ones you can buy are marked as G4911 but i have no idea if these are also oem, made by other producer or some lower quality replacements that looks entirely different. Can anyone help? 😃  P.s. there is also some strange indication - 0V005, 0V015 and 0V505. Any idea what does it mean? Would appreciate any help with this 🙏
    • Hi, Marek here 🙋‍♂️. I finally fulfilled my longtime dream - recently bought Stagea and now waiting for it to arrive in Poland. There's only few of these in my country, and one of the owners  recommended mi this forum as a source of all the info i'd need since now i own one  so here i am.  
    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
×
×
  • Create New...