Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Just wondering if anybody knows how to determine the roll centre of a car?

Also what solutions are available if they need adjustment.

Specifically for an S13, I am having trouble getting under the car to check the geometry with any great accuracy, any help would be appreciated

cheers

Steve

Roll centre calculation depends on the type / design / geometry of the suspension, eg macpherson struts are calculated totally differently to semi-trailing arms.

I think it's covered in a book by Fred Puhl (maybe Puhn). Worth owning. Check out Pitstop Bookshop in Perth (pitstop.net.au)

Hi all,

Just wondering if anybody knows how to determine the roll centre of a car?  

Also what solutions are available if they need adjustment.

Specifically for an S13, I am having trouble getting under the car to check the geometry with any great accuracy, any help would be appreciated

cheers

Steve

Hi Steve, very hard to describe using words. Best to look for diagrams. Simply put;

S13's have MacPherson struts at the front, so the adjustment for roll centre is the inner lower bush verticle locatiion. Noting that the angle of the lower control arm needs to be maintained, so any adjustments at the inner bush must be matched by adjustments at the upright.

The rear is bascially double wishbone so the roll centre is determined by the verticle location of the inner upper and inner lower bushes of trhe control arms. As with the front, the angle of both control arms need to be maintained, so any adjustments at the inner bush must be matched by adjustments at the upright.

I have found very little issue with the S13/14/15 chassis as far as roll centre is concerned, but you can get problems when they are excessively lowered. This reduces the roll couple (difference between roll centre and centre of gravity) and they tend to hop (pig root is the term most often used) rather than slide progressively. The Japanese solution (as always) is to stick huge spring rates in so that there is practically zero roll. Then the roll centre becomes irrelevant because the only roll is tyre compression.

:(

Thanks for that, I do think my car may be a bit low and was hoping to be able to check if it needs attention. I have looked at a couple of diagrams that describe how roll centre is determined - but climbing under my car, I dont know how I am going to take the measurements as described :(

Any ideas?

Also, is there a recomended bias between front and rear roll centre?

My S13 is quite low, and does hop a little on hard corners, but not when sliding.

The japs acutally make roll centre adjustable arms for the front, Nams and JIC are two that come to mind.

They only seem to make them for the front on silvias.

Thanks for your help

The differential between the front & rear roll centres will go a long way to determining how the car handles, ie a higher roll couple will give more grip for that particular axle. Most people dial this out by using adjustable anti roll bars, rather than adjusting roll centres. Put simply a stiffer anti roll bar gives less grip.

Thanks for that, I do think my car may be a bit low and was hoping to be able to check if it needs attention.  I have looked at a couple of diagrams that describe how roll centre is determined - but climbing under my car, I dont know how I am going to take the measurements as described ;)  

Any ideas?

Also, is there a recomended bias between front and rear roll centre?

My S13 is quite low, and does hop a little on hard corners, but not when sliding.

The japs acutally make roll centre adjustable arms for the front, Nams and JIC are two that come to mind.

They only seem to make them for the front on silvias.

Thanks for your help

Hi Steve, suggestions follow;

Roll centre projection is best done via a drawing, you won't be able to do it "on the car". You will have to take the measurements on the car and then draw it to scale. Change the drawing until you achieve the roll centre you want, then transfer that to metal work on the car.

Usually, in a front engine rear drive car, you would have a higher rear roll centre than than front, because the CoG is higher in the rear. It is the roll couple that is important.

Yep, hopping is a sign of too low a rear roll centre, thus the roll couple is too big and you get the amplified pendulum effect. Once the wheels are spinning you have basically zero grip, the problem is when you are setting up for the drift, while you have some rear traction. You get the pig rooting and you can't pick or control the slip angles. It looks like poor technique, but it is really chassis set up.

The front roll centre adjustment is more necessary because of the shortcomings of the MacPherson strut design. It is very sensitive to excessive lowering and the Japs love to have them looooooow.

Somewhere at home I have the drawings for a MacPherson strut roll centre on a Datto, if I can find it I will post it up.

:(

PS; If you do roll centre adjustments on the front, you will also need to do bump steer correction. Because of the steering rack location, moving the lower inner mounting point really stuffs up the bump steer.

Thanks for the replies, couple more questions:

What is the roll couple??

(edit:) how do you correct for bump steer? dampening and wheel alignment? suggestions?

Also, for cornering the front seems to be looser than the rear, ie, it jumps around more - is this because I have more of a problem up front?

Cheers again

Thanks for the replies, couple more questions:

1. What is the roll couple??

2. how do you correct for bump steer? dampening and wheel alignment?  suggestions?

3. Also, for cornering the front seems to be looser than the rear, ie, it jumps around more - is this because I have more of a problem up front?

Cheers again

I think this previous post answers question #1.......

have found very little issue with the S13/14/15 chassis as far as roll centre is concerned, but you can get problems when they are excessively lowered. This reduces the roll couple (difference between roll centre and centre of gravity) and they tend to hop

#2. Bump steer is a change in toe settings as the suspension moves up and down, such as over bumps, hence the term "bump steer". To correct bump steer on a MacPherson Strut car you have to change the relationship between the lower control arms and the steering arms. Usually by inserting a spacer between the steering arm and the upright (ie; at the steering ball joint). You can also remove bump steer by lowering (or raising) the steering rack, but this causes problems with location for the steering shaft. So most people do it at the steering arm ball joint.

#3. This can be caused by too small a roll couple, bump steer or excessive dynamic camber change. If by raising the front you improve the front end grip, then it is going to be one or more of these three things. If raising it doesn't improve the front end grip then it is a spring, shock, front stabiliser bar or caster problem. Note that you should always reset the static camber on a MacPherson strut car when you change the height.

Simple stuff, as I do it everytime we build a new race car:cheers:

Easy way to tell if they car is too low. Look at all the arms, if they are flat then its too bloody low.

Also quick question, if my front is higher than my rear, what effect either positive or negitive (pardon the semi pun) would this have?

I think this previous post answers question #1.......
:Oops: sorry.
Yep, hopping is a sign of too low a rear roll centre, thus the roll couple is too big
This can be caused by too small a roll couple

Sorry, but now I am confused, the second quote was a response to my asking why my front is loose and tends to hop. So to clarify, does this mean that too big a roll couple on the rear has the same effect as too small a roll couple on the front - or if a roll couple is too big or too small it has a similar effect?

Cheers

I am trying to get the car as low as possible (for lower CG) but I dont want to sacrifice handling - hopefully I can find a work around if my car is 'too low'. Might have to investigate these jap roll centre adjustors. R&D can be costly...

:Oops: sorry.

Sorry, but now I am confused, the second quote was a response to my asking why my front is loose and tends to hop.  So to clarify, does this mean that too big a roll couple on the rear has the same effect as too small a roll couple on the front - or if a roll couple is too big or too small it has a similar effect?

Cheers

I am trying to get the car as low as possible (for lower CG) but I dont want to sacrifice handling - hopefully I can find a work around if my car is 'too low'.  Might have to investigate these jap roll centre adjustors.  R&D can be costly...

Hi Steve, yep too large a rear roll couple has the same efect on the front as too small a front roll couple. Same logic as stabiliser bars, too big a rear bar makes the car oversteer same as too small a front bar.

Lowering the car too much has 10 dissadvantages and only 1 advantage, the lower CoG has stuff all effect on handling compared to the other 10. The reality is lowering the car is done for looks, not handling. We did a test for a magazine about 3 years ago on 4 X GTST's and the highest one was the fastest one around the circuit. The lowest one, was the slowest one.

Keep the height reasonable and spend the saved money on better tyres or bigger wheels or more power, the car will be faster, more sideways and much easier to control.:cheers:

Hi guys,

I dropped in here to see what i could learn. I am in the process of building a lotus 7 type clubman from the ground up and plan on using a skyline rear end and possibly front uprights and brakes also.

I have been doing heaps of research into suspension design recently and can perhaps offer some comments here.

Different roll centre front to back is not good.

An analogy I was give was if you get a shoe box and a long rod. Insert the rod at one end down low and out the other towards the top of the box, this is effectively you roll centre axis, rotate the box from side to side to mimic body roll of the car and you will see what happens to each of the 4 corners (tyres). Depending on your suspension set up one can not always get these points at the same height but from what I have read it is desirable.

If you have say a live axle in the rear and independent in the front the rear will almost always be higher there is little you can do about it.

I have also tried to include a pic which should show you the way to identify rc for mac pherson strut. Hope it works, ok no idea any tips on how to post an image??

Cheers

Andrew

Thanks again SK, could you possibly post up some of the dissadvantages to lowering a car? Also, why do they lower touring cars, F1, etc as much as they can before it starts scrubbing?

Hypothetically, if you can remove all the associated downsides of lowering a car, wouldnt it then be an advantage to have it lower????

agk, cheers, makes sense. I think you can use panhard rods to lower roll centre on live axle, not a huge difference from the research I have done though.

To insert an image, you must host it on a site first.

Hi guys,

I dropped in here to see what i could learn.  I am in the process of building a lotus 7 type clubman from the ground up and plan on using a skyline rear end and possibly front uprights and brakes also.

I have been doing heaps of research into suspension design recently and can perhaps offer some comments here.

Different roll centre front to back is not good.

An analogy I was give was if you get a shoe box and a long rod.  Insert the rod at one end down low and out the other towards the top of the box, this is effectively you roll centre axis, rotate the box from side to side to mimic body roll of the car and you will see what happens to each of the 4 corners (tyres).  Depending on your suspension set up one can not always get these points at the same height but from what I have read it is desirable.

If you have say a live axle in the rear and independent in the front the rear will almost always be higher there is little you can do about it.

I have also tried to include a pic which should show you the way to identify rc for mac pherson strut. Hope it works, ok no idea any tips on how to post an image??

Cheers

Andrew

Andrew,

Please be careful. Not sure who told you that different roll centres front to back is not good, but they are wrong. An inclined roll axis (think of a line drawn along the length of the car between the front & rear roll centres) is one of the most powerful tools that a chassis tuner has. Almost all cars have these to help compensate for poor front to rear weight distribution.

By way of an example the rear roll centre on a Watts linkaged live axle car (eg my old Foulcan, or most Lotus 7 clones) is defined by where the linkage picks up on the diff housing. This is what the V8 cars get changed in the pits. Changing the roll centre inclines the roll axis either more or less - depending on what the driver needs.

Hope this makes sense.

Thanks again SK, could you possibly post up some of the dissadvantages to lowering a car?  Also, why do they lower touring cars, F1, etc as much as they can before it starts scrubbing?

Hypothetically, if you can remove all the associated downsides of lowering a car, wouldnt it then be an advantage to have it lower????

agk, cheers, makes sense.  I think you can use panhard rods to lower roll centre on live axle, not a huge difference from the research I have done though.

To insert an image, you must host it on a site first.

Steve,

You need to be a bit careful with motorsport analogies. They lower F1 & touring cars as much as they can for the aero benefits - mostly more downforce from the front wing/splitter.

A lower car has, by definition a lower centre of gravity. If you have free reign in suspension design eg an F1 car this is an excellent starting point. If you don't eg a road car then it is probably best to forget about the c of g & instead concentrate on the roll couple and thence the roll axis. These are the important parameters - the cog is only half the story.

Lowering MacPherson struts too far can result in a larger roll couple than prior to modification because of the way the geometry is worked out. I really need to dig out the diagram to explain it properly...

Hi guys,

I dropped in here to see what i could learn.  I am in the process of building a lotus 7 type clubman from the ground up and plan on using a skyline rear end and possibly front uprights and brakes also.

I have been doing heaps of research into suspension design recently and can perhaps offer some comments here.

Different roll centre front to back is not good.

An analogy I was give was if you get a shoe box and a long rod.  Insert the rod at one end down low and out the other towards the top of the box, this is effectively you roll centre axis, rotate the box from side to side to mimic body roll of the car and you will see what happens to each of the 4 corners (tyres).  Depending on your suspension set up one can not always get these points at the same height but from what I have read it is desirable.

If you have say a live axle in the rear and independent in the front the rear will almost always be higher there is little you can do about it.

I have also tried to include a pic which should show you the way to identify rc for mac pherson strut. Hope it works, ok no idea any tips on how to post an image??

Cheers

Andrew

Hi Andrew, interesting analogy, but a shoe box has a CoG that is the same as its geometric centre. This not the case with a car, it has different mass locations along it axis. It would be technically more correct to say that is balanced if the roll couple is the same front and rear ie; the roll centre and CoG at the front is the same distance apart as the the roll centre and CoG at the rear.

:D

There is a scan of a diagram of how to calculate roll centres for MacPherson struts now included in my photo album thing (On the left). It comes from a book by Jeffrey Daniels published by Motor Racing Publications. Unfortunately the book was published in 1988 & I haven't been able to find a copy anywhere.

Also added bit about an inclined roll axis.

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
×
×
  • Create New...