Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Do you want to be able to estimate (for any car):

1) 60ft time

2) 200ft time

3) 1/4 mile time

4) 1/4 mile speed

5) Wheel spin / traction graphs

6) Most efficient shift points for best ET or best terminal speed.

7) Accleleration graphs

8) Distasnce v time

9) Gradient charts

10) and see what effect varying hundreds of vehicle parameters has on all the above.

and more...

Then take a look at the Excel dyno (excell file) that can be downloaded in the following location.

http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/exceldyno/

It is a really cool excell file based on visual basic macros that allows you to enter data about a car and accuratly estimate heaps of performance parameters. Inputs include, engine dyno data, car parameters (CD, weight..etc), tyre setup and more. It allows you to set shift points or have it calculate the most efficient points.

All credit for its creation goes to Wez, a mate form work. He is a mechanical engineer and has had a fair bit of experence playing around with cars - he also seems to have a lot of spare time :P He has set up a Yahoo group for all things Excel dyno, if your interested take a look.

It has been tested with a number of different cars and it has proven to return supprisingly accurate results.

Of most intrest to people on this forum would be the R32 GTR data that is already entered in the program - this data was based on another workmates car and gives very accurate results when tested at the drags. Just enter your dyno chart and car details and you can start dropping those 1/4 times.

You can always add any car that is not already in the program as long as you know all the parameters.

Here is a list of car/bike data that is already entered in the database:

93 MR2 Turbo

95 200SX SE-R

Ford Falcon AUIII

Ford Telstar 92,95

MX6 - Gen II V6

Subaru WRX

VW Baja

VW drag manx

R32 GTR

Suzuki DL650

Suzuki Hayabusa

It is all free but if you want to give Wez cash I'm sure he will not refuse:) just email him on the address at the website above.

Ray Hall also has a similar thing.....

http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html

:)

Except that is more a rule of thumb than any sort of remotely accurate calculation.

If people want to find car specs and send them to me then I will post a new version of the sheet with the new cars up on the net.

The cars that are in there are just a few that I had some good data for so entered to check the accuracy of everything. Finding the aero data is the hardest.

Hey Wez, did not take you long to find the thread!

Ray Hall also has a similar thing.....

http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html

Like Wez said, his program is in another ballpark.

I thought I'd post up the calculated best shift points for a R32 GTR, that should get things going:

For best km/h: (this gives 11.155 @ 202.7km/h)

RPM GEAR km/h

4000 stall speed 36

8500 first 77

8200 second 124.2

8010 third 179

8020 fourth 234

8500 fifth 330

For best ET: (this gives 11.144 @ 201.8 km/h)

RPM GEAR km/h

4000 stall speed 36

8500 (redline) first 77

8500 (redline) second 128.8

8500 (redline) third 190

8500 (redline) fourth 248

8500 (redline) fifth 330

Here is a bit of an explination of why the shift points are different when chasing high trap speeds or Low ET's (from the Excell dyno)

These shift points will give you the max terminal speed for the 1/4 mile. These points are essentially where the torque curves cross each other on the Traction chart. Note these points are not always exactly right as the wind slows the vehicle during gear shift making the best shift point estimation more difficult.

However, to achieve the best ET you generally need to change gears a little later. This is because shifting later means you are going faster for the during of the shift time. This means more distance will be covered. The optimum shift point is when the advantage of shifting later if offset by the loss of being too far past where the torque curves cross. These points are easily found by trial and error. Start with the best shift points for terminal speed and increase the shift rpm from there. For most engines the best ET will be achieved by revving to redline.

Well when the car had the 291HP dyno chart it ran the quarter and ran an 11.9. The Excel Dyno predicts that run perfectly.

With the extra 85 wheel hp it should easily push the car into the low 11's. I can't remember if he got a time slip before that engine spat the ceramic turbines through the engine.

I had a quick look - R32 GTR with 375RWHP running 11.1@125mph? i doubt it...

Does that mean you entered your car data? Is that what the excell sheet returned?

Well when the car had the 291HP dyno chart it ran the quarter and ran an 11.9. The Excel Dyno predicts that run perfectly.  

With the extra 85 wheel hp it should easily push the car into the low 11's. I can't remember if he got a time slip before that engine spat the ceramic turbines through the engine.

220rwkw (291rwhp) ran an 11.9? what mph? that must be a low dyno reading, what boost was he running?

Ferni,

That was my car. I'm pretty sure I have told you about it before.

When my car arrived from Japan it made 217 rwkw. That was on a dyno dynamics dyno (non shootout mode). I ran an 11.99 @ 115.4 mph at our drag strip here in Townsville.

I have been involved in the development of excel dyno and I can say that it is very accurate, as long as you give it accurate data. It's in a league of its own compared to most other programs out there.

I will write more later when I have more time...

Hey Gary,

Didn't know you had a 32 GTR last time I was up on site, prolly a good thing, I would have spent more time talking about cars than getting the full "QNI experence". I have to take a look next time I'm sent up there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...