Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys im from the Uk and own a r33 gts t, ive been asking questions on other forums in the uk about this device, and have been advised on the following.....

is not advisable to allow the car to run the higher level of boost early in the rev range due to the ignition advance in the lower rpm range, removing the 2 stage boost control will allow the boost to run at .7bar from 2500 rpm and the ignition map will be too agressive to allow the engine to run without detonation.

Im not wishing to name names here but would just like to know what your opinion on this comment is.

Im not a mechanical wizard, and really just want to know the 2 sides of a coin so to speak.

Im just intriqued:)

What you say is true to a certain extent.

the r33 computer does provide more ignition advance lower down.

and you should NEVER increase the boost with a standard car without checking AFR's and ignition timing.

Having said that. i have never seen a probleb boosting a stock r33 to 10 psi.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well I installed mine today. Had upgraded from a GFB bleeder. I also checked the knock levels on the PFC while testing the performance, it may have even been knocking slightly less with this controller. It still hooks up nicely, having full boost earlier dosen't produce any traction problems on my car.

One issue I found with my car, is that the vacuum hose that I had (believe it's the hose that came with the GFB bleeder) didn't fit well over the nipples, but had some spare slightly larger vacuum hose (blue) and that fitted beautifully.

ps. My car is SR20 180sx for those that don't know.

I'm also from the UK and have been debating this device.

Surely if all you want to do is have 10 psi / 0.68 Bar at the lower rev range then just cut the wire advised here http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=42895

12 psi = 0.82 bar and I am told this is unsafe for the turbo and will drasticaly reduce it's life and put strain on the engine and most definantly cause det, due to the reasons posted by my UK friend above.

If all this is true then surely this device is dangerous and a bit of a gamble.

If any can explain why it is ok then please tell me, I am only going on what I'm being told from the UK, pesonally I'd love to use the device but don't want to do so unless I'm confident the turo wont give way and I wont get det.

modding cars is allways a risk. running 12 psi is a calculated risk. from all the data gathered you have to make your own decision.

listen to others experience and follow it.

ofcorse you will use more fuel, shorten the life of a ceramic wheel turbo and so on if you don't tune your car properly.

But its like anything. I wouldnt run standard 92 octane petrol in my car and go boosting it everywhere because it is a risk.

but speaking from experience 12psi is "fairly" safe with a stock turbo. However, I have seen them die at standard boost. and i have also seen them running 17psi without failing.

the device is not dangerous, but yes like every aftermarket part you can buy for your car it is a bit of a gamble. but any device that increases boost presure is exactly the same.

as for the increased timing in the lower rev range promoting pinging at 12 psi with this controller, if you run premium fuel and standard base timing you should never have a problem.

in the end you have to make up your own mind...

it me it's not even an issue,

Thanks for your opinion.

What octane fuel can you get over there?

We have 95, 97, 98 From Shell Optimax and some very rare places have 99 at a supermarket which has just been released.

Hi Japtastic, we have 92 octane unleaded and most cars use that. then we have 95 octane called premium unleaded. and then we have shell optimax 98 octane and also bp ultimate 98 octane.

I have also seen 100 octane fuel but it was an independant service station. we use 98 octane in performance cars here.

Hi guys im from the Uk and own a r33 gts t, ive been asking questions on other forums in the uk about this device, and have been advised on the following.....

is not advisable to allow the car to run the higher level of boost early in the rev range due to the ignition advance in the lower rpm range, removing the 2 stage boost control will allow the boost to run at .7bar from 2500 rpm and the ignition map will be too agressive to allow the engine to run without detonation.

Im not wishing to name names here but would just like to know what your opinion on this comment is.

Im not a mechanical wizard, and really just want to know the 2 sides of a coin so to speak.

Im just intriqued:)

That 2 stage boost controller is there mainly i think to stop wheel spin in the lower gears.

Hey dudes

Sorry for interrupting

Bought one of these off ebay yesterday and am going to get my mechanic to install it on the weekend.

Just a question and sorry if its been asked before, but would the stock boost gauge be OK for testing?

Just in case I bought a boost gauge off ebay too.

My car currently has stock boost.

Dang, havn't even owned my Skyline for a week yet and I'm already after more boost!

Haha Gengis I'd drive your car a little while longer before boosting things. Just like a month or two to see the general condition of the car and if theres anything that needs attention or fixing first.

Well to answer your question, you're probably best installed the boost gauge at the same time and use that to see what boost your running.

Standard boost gauge and standard oil pressure gauges are notoriously inaccurate, it would be stupid to try and rely on it to check boost while setting this device up, you'll simply end up with a broken skyline if you do.

Feedback time and I'm hoping this will be taken as constructive feedback as that is how it's meant. :)

Well, I installed this bleed valve in my HCR32 yesterday and went out on a road test to adjust it ( keeping in mind that I'm running a HKS GT25/35 and 1.2 bar of boost ) I spent about 40 minutes out on the open road trying to tune it but this valve doesn't seem to suit my requirements because I couldn't find a way to make it work.

With the bolt ( adjuster ) screwed almost all the way out it was making 0.6 bar at best and with minor increments ( screwing in 1/4 turn at a time ) it was making no difference until 1 & 1/4 turns inwards. At this stage the boost spiked to 1.5 bar, fluctuated violently and then settled at 1.2 bar.

I went as far as pulling the valve off and pulling it apart to ensure that all was OK and then went through the whole process again with much the same results ;)

I AM NOT saying this valve is bad but more stating that for higher boost applications, I found it to be unsuitable. If you're boosting a stocker, I'm confident that this valve would be good :)

In summary, if anyone would like to buy this one off me, let me know as I'll sell it for $20 plus postage. PM me if interested.

Sounds like you got a dud. ;)

Mine is actually very accurate with only the slightest adjustment varying boost.

I've had mine up to 15-16psi. Obviously I havent kept my foot in to it as she was leaning out in the top end due to small injectors.

Feedback time and I'm hoping this will be taken as constructive feedback as that is how it's meant. :)

 

Well, I installed this bleed valve in my HCR32 yesterday and went out on a road test to adjust it ( keeping in mind that I'm running a HKS GT25/35 and 1.2 bar of boost ) I spent about 40 minutes out on the open road trying to tune it but this valve doesn't seem to suit my requirements because I couldn't find a way to make it work.

With the bolt ( adjuster ) screwed almost all the way out it was making 0.6 bar at best and with minor increments ( screwing in 1/4 turn at a time ) it was making no difference until 1 & 1/4 turns inwards. At this stage the boost spiked to 1.5 bar, fluctuated violently and then settled at 1.2 bar.

I went as far as pulling the valve off and pulling it apart to ensure that all was OK and then went through the whole process again with much the same results ;)

I AM NOT saying this valve is bad but more stating that for higher boost applications, I found it to be unsuitable. If you're boosting a stocker, I'm confident that this valve would be good :)

In summary, if anyone would like to buy this one off me, let me know as I'll sell it for $20 plus postage. PM me if interested.

If your running a aftermarket turbo and other mods i wouldnt be relying on this type of manual boost controller. I would invest in a good ebc.

If your running a aftermarket turbo and other mods i wouldnt be relying on this type of manual boost controller. I would invest in a good ebc.

Agreed ;) and I will buy an EBC soon, but for the money, it was worth a try :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...