Jump to content
SAU Community

  

311 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have a TT RZ (AUTO) which is my misses car and in week or two hopefully will get my R33 GTR heavily modded 320KW. My supra has been lowered and has suspension upgrades along with 17*9 mags so handles fantastic also has traction control. Supra dynod at 220RWKW with Zhorst, pod and chip at 12psi. Traction much better than people think or maybe just mine with the upgrades as I can put my foot down flat out and have ever only lost traction very slightly which the traction control corrected straight away. In wet have gone hard to almost 5000 rpm and same thing but mine not standard so hard to say.

Supra fantastic torque and almost bullet proof engine. Either way I am happy but IMO Supra more comparison with GTR.

I vote for an R32GTR with an RB31DET with the same amount of money spent. Lighter, more power and (best of all) 4wd, something a Supra simply doesn't have. Plus it's Godzilla and has a racing heritage second to none.

Easy decision

:) cheers :wub:

I vote for an R32GTR with an RB31DET with the same amount of money spent. Lighter, more power and (best of all) 4wd, something a Supra simply doesn't have. Plus it's Godzilla and has a racing heritage second to none.

Easy decision

;) cheers :D

best thing ive read all year........

tt supra for a daily any day, cruising is a f**king dream, give it a squirt and she pumps along like crazy, 2jz.... like many before me, is the my choice, awsome throughout the rev range, want to cruise low rpm, no problem,, want to bounce shy of redline and sure,

throw small mods, i.e. exhuast, fmic and management, and your pulling allot more power that a gtt, the gtt would need an injector upgrade and a shite load of boost to keep up and last about 3/4 as long eh ?

im an ass man, love the girls azz, luv the supra's azzz, the gtt lights are good, but the sup's front end is an ugly thing

gtt with a gtr kit an they look awsome, get an aero tt and swap out the 6 sp getrag and the limo diff and wooooosa, sex on wheels

wheres that dude with teh black aero tt MANUAL when you need him ?

Having both supra and skyline I go on here and Supra forums. I am very impressed how unbiased skyline driver's are not knocking supra owners but if you posted R33GTR vs RZ Supra on their forums from what I have read it would be like 75% supra. Also I don't understand why most supra owners want 400+rwkw as RWD would have major troubles with traction. Even most modified GTR's on here are generally 300-350KW for track and only 400+ if set up for drags.

2jz baby,

give me a gtt with a vvti 2jz-gte swap .. and your prolly talking something big fun

but you gota have the sequential twin setup... else it looses it for me,

get all flopy and that's never good.

but why bother, cheaper to just upg the neo det,

hmmm wonder about installing a sequential setup into it eh ? for that added drivability

wonder how those boys went with the uneven sized sequentials,

hmmm small first screw and somhow have it flow enough to pump the big fan through the waste gate ?

eh saw a vl with teh 2.5/3 L conversion somewhere that had a sequential twin setup.. gota dig that dirty website up . think i got it off here actually

I vote for an R32GTR with an RB31DET with the same amount of money spent. Lighter, more power and (best of all) 4wd, something a Supra simply doesn't have. Plus it's Godzilla and has a racing heritage second to none.

Easy decision

:ermm: cheers :D

i doubt u'll be spending the same amount of money to get the same power, u'll be definately be spending more. Anyway i pick an RZ over a gtt or gtr NE day. As for weight they both weigh about the same (stated in a few mags, HPI, Speed Mag.

  • 3 weeks later...

hell, this is a close vote, comming down to the wire. I voted the r34..........and make it a four door. Oohhhh those look mad as, very nice ride. Don't find the supra look as classy and sytylish as the R34, but i can see the attraction.....initially!

Regards Evan

When I was looking to buy a new car it was between R33 and Supra.. Makes this a bit of a tough decision. I didn't much like the shape of the R34 originally, but after seeing it in the flesh it looks pretty darn sweet.

It is a tough choice between the two, but I'd choose the R34.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...