Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Could you explain why it cannot be done if you have an immobilizer? what must be done different to get it to work?

I just got my Greddy turbo timer......but waz unsure where to get it installed as i have an immobliser (so cant DIY).......i know car toys can do it 4 $95 but dat seems pretti expensive..........do u guys know any1 who could do it 4 a better price.......

                                                                                                          Cheers

Will do it for $45 live in the hills. just out of interest what sort of Immobiliser is it and is it a basic t timer or one with Rpm and 0 - 400 time etc.

If youve got an Immob you have to wire the timer up so that the car still runs when armed but when timer cuts out can't be started.

care to explain how I can do it? as I recently had a alarm installed and now my basic turbo timer no longer works presumably due to the imobilizer?

Will do it for $45 live in the hills. just out of interest what sort of Immobiliser is it and is it a basic t timer or one with Rpm and 0 - 400 time etc.  

If youve got an Immob you have to wire the timer up so that the car still runs when armed but when timer cuts out can't be started.

I'm planning on hooking up a Greddy full auto turbo timer soon.

i think you would need to hook up a relay or two?

whe the turbo timer is running the relay would cut points of the imobiliser once the turbo timer cuts the engin the relay will connect the imobiliser points...

this might make it easyer for somone to find the imobiliser wires and knock off the car though....

If it works ill post up what i did if you like.

Adam.

Hi Adam,

That would be great, as I'd like to get my TT working again .. Its annoying that I have to drive like a sissy for a few k's to cool down the turbo now .. :P

I'm planning on hooking up a  Greddy full auto turbo timer soon.

i think you would need to hook up a relay or two?  

whe the turbo timer is running the relay would cut points of the imobiliser once the turbo timer cuts the engin the relay will connect the imobiliser points...

this might make it easyer for somone to find the imobiliser wires and knock off the car though....  

If it works ill post up what i did if you like.

Adam.

  • 2 weeks later...

Its easy enough to put the tt in with an immobiliser you just have to hook it up to the ignition after the cut for the immob. this way the can can still run but only on tt hope this makes sense. Also if your alarm has a ignition sense you should wire it to accesories so that you can arm the system while the tt is in.

I was actually thinking that too, but thanks for advising ..

I will give it a go on the weekend.

Its easy enough to put the tt in with an immobiliser you just have to  

hook it up to the ignition after the cut for the immob. this way the can can still run but only on tt hope this makes sense. Also if your alarm has a ignition sense you should wire it to accesories so that you can arm the system while the tt is in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...