Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

15.5 ?? haha no, i think your right the 33 does do like a 14.4 and the 32 does like a 14.6 or something. I agree the 32 feels like it needs a bit of a torque upgrade which you can get by using the money u save (in buying one over a 33) to put an rb25 in.

The light weight and handling of a 32 with the power and torque of a 33...

The R33 is more practical, faster, cheaper to make more power, an interior that doesnt look like a Holden Commodore VN (R32 interior). All together its a newer car, less things will go bang on it. So it spends more time on the road and less in a garage.

The interior comment is the onl thing you said that holds any water.

No-one has proved conclusively that the R33 is faster then the R32. They are identical or at the best R32 is a little quicker.

It surprises me that so many of your comments were rather stereo typical.

I think the R32 appeals more to people that have migrated from S13s and still want a nimble smaller car whereas the R33 appeals to people who want something more practical (and butt ugly :D)

The R33 dash is far better then the R32 but the exterior looks like a taxi imo.

15.5 ?? haha no, i think your right the 33 does do like a 14.4 and the 32 does like a 14.6 or something.  I agree the 32 feels like it needs a bit of a torque upgrade which you can get by using the money u save (in buying one over a 33) to put an rb25 in.

The light weight and handling of a 32 with the power and torque of a 33...

i know the R33 does a 14.4 but im pruty sure that a r32 doesnt do a 14.6

i searched over the net for some times but i saw notin to say its 14.6

unless u can prove me wrong. im sure its a 15 sec car or more

http://www.importdriver.com.au/Coupe_Targa.htm

i know the R33 does a 14.4 but im pruty sure that a r32 doesnt do a 14.6

i searched over the net for some times but i saw notin to say its 14.6  

unless u can prove me wrong. im sure its a 15 sec car or more

http://www.importdriver.com.au/Coupe_Targa.htm

Hahahha don't trust what you see on those jap race videos, i think they are rigged like wrestling!!! If that episode talks about a certain car, most of the time that car will be the fastest.!!! and don't believe everything u see on the net hahaha

i know the R33 does a 14.4 but im pruty sure that a r32 doesnt do a 14.6

i searched over the net for some times but i saw notin to say its 14.6  

unless u can prove me wrong. im sure its a 15 sec car or more

http://www.importdriver.com.au/Coupe_Targa.htm

http://www.importforums.com/information.htm - this was the first link that came up... im sure there are many others. I never really beleive mags and stuff but the point is that most places that give you specified times will always place the 32 and 33 very close.

The point is why would you pay more for a car that most people think looks worse, handles worse, less fun to drive and the tiniest bit quicker over a quarter mile...

unless of course your not most people and prefer the 33 in most respects. In that case then definately go the 33 !

Well, as an R33 (GTS-T) owner, I'll try to be as unbiased as possible here.

When I was deciding which car to buy I was looking into S13 180SX (I came 24hours too late for a beautiful white 1996 180SX, FFS - BRIDE SEATS!), the R32 and R33s. Apart from liking the R33s looks - though I also like the R32s - I couldn't justify putting the 18k or so down on a 1990 model car when I could pay roughly the same for a much newer 1996 model. Now, I know the age doesn't determine everything with a car and it's possible that I could pickup a 1996 peice of shit when I could have collected a well looked after 1990 model. But, being me (IE, not exactly a mechanic), I sure as hell wouldn't want to be forking out $$$ to fix broken gear-boxes etc. So, when I continued to see 1990 R32s with 80,000kms and 1996 models with 80,000kms I made sure I stayed well clear of them.

Other than that, I like the interior of the S2 R33s, the additional features - dual air bags. On top of that, the handling isn't bad - perhaps not as good as the nimbler R32s, and the R33s are faster - ever so slightly. So, all in all, both seemingly in the same price bracket, the R33 offers (for me atleast) and far more complete package.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...