Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Head gasket "strength" does not, per se, come from thickness. The current trend to supply a trhicker gasket to reduce CR is just a lousy crutch to make this "easy". What it also does is increase the quench clearance, a bad thing. I can change < well, at least drop), CR by machining my piston tops, I need to reduce the quench clearance though, and this is more easiliy done by yusing a thinner head gasket than milling the block and having the pistons protrude more. hence the question re thinnest gasket. Thanks.

Chris,

The thinnest we have found is a cometic gasket that comes out at very close to .040" compressed. It was 87.5mm bore size in the gasket. The last 26 we did we raised the compression slightly by milling the block until the piston protruded .010" out the top of the block. That gives .030" quench clearance between the quench pads on the piston and the head. I wouldn't go much less than this though, I'd say .025" clearance at a minimum depending on the RPM you're planning on using and the quality of rod/pin/piston. I think .030" is safe for 8500ish-9000RPM.

I saw in another post you mentioned you've seen the quench pads removed from the head. I've wondered about this too, we normally radius the edge of the pad and that's about it. I'd like to know what the benefit of removing the pad is, it would help by unshrouding the valves and would probably improve flame travel slightly but I'd say you would have to use a different profile on the piston dome to benefit from it. I'd say they must still leave a ring around the chamber to give quench.

I'd love to see someone with a lot more money than me make an aftermarket head with a flatter valve angle and smaller combustion chamber, something like an EJ20 or SR20 and use an almost flat top piston. I'd say the gains would be huge.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
    • Shock tower brace is in +5Kw....LOL  
×
×
  • Create New...