Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Howdy,

Just had the car tuned recently, and its making more power obviously.

With my 2 way diff, you can feel the rear end move around now.

I need advice on how to stiffen the rear....

Do I replace the bushes with std ones, or go the Noltec urethane ones?

How much NVH does the urethane ones add to the car? Car is mainly a road car with some track work intended in the future.

Which "pineapples" do people suggest - the alloy ones, or the other urethane ones?

Im thinking of going for the Noltec, with the alloy mounts but dont want the ride to become a rattle box.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78479-sub-frame-movement/
Share on other sites

get alloy subframe spacers/pineapples. They apparently make a huge difference, no more axle tramp!!

There is a thread on them on http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...showtopic=84489 a couple of people mentioned u don't get much more drivetrain noise

IMO i woudn't bother with the urethane ones, i'd just go straight to the alloy ones. I have some ready to go into my car, just c.b.f'd installing them.

What sort of track work? drift??

(If you want to buy a set, PM me)

I dont have axle tramp at all suprisingly. I wanna replace the mounts first, then move onto

these alloy pineapples....

Car is mostly street driven, with the odd track in the future. No drift, just circuit :( Maybe drags if i feel like having a number....(pmk me what you can get them for :))

cheers.

go the alloy pinapples. urethane ones require new bushes to be fitted for best handling. alloy ones squash everything up and make it so it cant move.

i have the alloy ones, they made a huge difference, i set them up for drift and could instantly feel the difference when sliding....the back end hangs out alot longer and easier.

cheers

Linton

ohh, i'm gonna get off my arse and put mine in..... my rear end is crap coz of soft coilovers. I just put a rear strut brace in and it makes a big difference for drift, this should make it even better.

in fact, if you don't have one, i'd also suggest a rear strut tower brace

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=77338

hi, ive got the noltec subframe bushes( not pineapples) in my car and I dont notice any increase in road noise/ harshness at all.

I also have new rear rack and hub bushes(nissan rubber) - done after subframe bushes fitted - so everything is pretty much new and tight and still dont feel any harshness at all. The car really holds the line well in the rear now, more noticeable improvement after doing rear rack and hub bushes than that felt when the subframe bushes were fitted first. Feels more positive on the track also, showing up the failings of my tyres as they do the squirming under load rather than the old subframe bushes that wiggled the car around corners!

A mate has noltec subframe bushes in his 32 GTR and I havent noticed any change in noise/ harshness.

hi, ive got the noltec subframe bushes( not pineapples) in my car and I dont notice any increase in road noise/ harshness at all.  

I also have new rear rack and hub bushes(nissan rubber) - done after subframe bushes fitted - so everything is pretty much new and tight and still dont feel any harshness at all. The car really holds the line well in the rear now, more noticeable improvement after doing rear rack and hub bushes than that felt when the subframe bushes were fitted first.  Feels more positive on the track also, showing up the failings of my tyres as they do the squirming under load rather than the old subframe bushes that wiggled the car around corners!

A mate has noltec subframe bushes in his 32 GTR and I havent noticed any change in noise/ harshness.

What is the difference between subframe bushes and pineapples.I was under the impression that they were one and the same,just given different names by different people.

as gts4diehard is saying.. rear rack ends are probably a good idea to replace too if you're doing the subframe bushes, as they will firm up the rear, and stop some movement there as well.

as pointed out by the suspension place I got the work done, even if you lock the HICAS.. you still have something decent on the ends to hold it in place :)

Made a bit of a difference in mine at higher speeds with a firmer feel

Replacement bushes (alloy or polyurethane) are NOT the same as "pineapples".

Replacement bushes simply replace the standard rubber bushes with a firmer (hardness) material. In the case of aluminium that is solid, which is not a good idea as it can lead to cracking of the subframe mounts. Nissan designed the rubber bushes to prevent this and to lower the NVH. Polyurethane is a good mid ground, it is much firmer than rubber (45 versus 90 duro) but it has some give to keep the NVH within reason and to prevent the chassis cracking under the vibration.

Pinapples are "tuning" device, by placing them above and/or below the subframe you can tune the amount of antisquat. More squat for drags gives better traction and faster launch. Lots of antisquat for drift to decrease the traction and enables easy/earlier slide.

Pineapples do add a worthhwhile amount of extra rigidity when used with the standard rubbers. But they make no difference to rigidity when used with aluminium bushes and very little difference when used with polyurethane bushes.

Hope that helps ;)

Nissan don't supply replacement subframe bushes.

They said they are not servicable.

its the same for even their Aus released cars. 300zx etc, no supply. :)

I think Nismo make "hardness up" rubber bushes:cheers:

Pineapples still sound like a goer with a whiteline kit.Ie:the extra urethane bushes that come with the kit.

But then would it or would it not show up the weak links in the cars handling.Like the tyres.

Is the 1degree +/- camber for the front,supplied in the whiteline kit as an extra,enough for most spirited weekend drivers.Or would stock camber up front suffice.

Pineapples still sound like a goer with a whiteline kit.Ie:the extra urethane bushes that come with the kit.

1. But then would it or would it not show up the weak links in the cars handling.Like the tyres.

2. Is the 1degree +/- camber for the front,supplied in the whiteline kit as an extra,enough for most spirited weekend drivers.

3. Or would stock camber up front suffice.

Hi Trust33;

1. The weakest link is always the weakest link, but there is no doubt that more contact patch from less roll will help any tyre.

2. When you lower them they end up at 1 to 1.5 degrees negative anyway, then add the Whiteline adjusters and you usually get 2.5 degrees negative. Which is not a bad place to start

3. Nope

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...