Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...
we MIGHT have it in before DECEMBER cant say how i know i just do.

Was supposed to arrive into the pumps at Selfs Point last month, but the safety team they set up to assess the setup deemed the setup unsatisfactory so we now have to wait a bit longer while they set everything up again to pass the safety inspection.

Oh and 98RON petty will be 2c/L dearer than ordinary 95RON petty :D.

This all came from the manager at Shell North Hobart, so it aint bullshit :D.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78592-pulp-98/page/2/#findComment-1527030
Share on other sites

Ive got a Microtech LT-8, thinking about upgrading to an LT-12 but there isn't much difference except more inputs/outputs. oh and the cost factor.

Do you know Paul with the White S4/5 RX7 (think he was at the drags) pretty sure he gets ELF or C16 or something from MOTO sports on Killafaddy Rd, i am pretty sure they get all that stuff in

was your 300rwkw run made just on plain jane 95RON Premo?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78592-pulp-98/page/2/#findComment-1528853
Share on other sites

yeh, MOTO get anything you want, I used to get toluene from them. Keen to want to spend that much on petrol though.

Off topic, who you getting to tune it tim? u got a new turbo yet?

Edited by phat_r33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78592-pulp-98/page/2/#findComment-1529244
Share on other sites

Went into MOTO today they have 102 octane for about $90 for 20litre drum.  He said they might be getting some 110 octane he will let me know when it arrives.

be good if you could keep us posted about it mate :)

Cheers B

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78592-pulp-98/page/2/#findComment-1538700
Share on other sites

Yeah let me know how u go with the fuel as well, as it is now gettin to high 300's for a 200L drum of bp ultimate which i use in the gtr and i will also use it in the race car and its gettin fairly expensive for pulp fuel.

cheers matt

Edited by BLUEGTR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78592-pulp-98/page/2/#findComment-1540308
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...