Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

been looking at replacement exhaust manifolds for my RB25det. i keep seeing the HKS cast iron low mount manifolds for sale.

img10061of.jpg

are these bad boys any good?? must be as heavy as the stock one though, should i save up for a stainless manifold??

does anyone know of a good low mount setup that doesnt have any pipework for an external gate??

do they sit the turbo in the original location??

all the stainless ones i see have pipework coming out for an external wastgate, im want to keep it internal unless i go high mount. the manifolds are all really expensive too.

any help would be appreciated

cheers

Linton

only think i know about stainless steel as it oxidises like any other metal at temps of around 300 - 350+

So considering most people chose it due to it being rust proof, thats sort of not true..

lol :P but from the looks of the HKS cast manafold, looks like a stock one with a flange for a wastegate. doesnt look like anything special. yet theres a good chance i have no idea :D

:)

care to go into why that is?

Reason being, cops dont like bling, SS is bling, and thats all it is.

crap cooling properties and its NOT rust proof..

Cast is used by HKS not just for RB/SR manifolds they even use them on there DRAG RACE CARS AND CIRCUIT CARS!

SS is cheaper and dodgey IMHO!

i dont know tech bits about it.. but who cares...

thanks guys. ive put a s/s manifold on a 180, turned blue, then purple, then gold, then brown and is starting to rust in the crevices, no dramas yet though, and its been almost a year....

the HKS is a much better design than the original, but does it sit the tubo in the same place?

i may go external, but thats a long time away...my turbo of choice at the moment is a 2835 pro with internal gate.

cheers

Linton

thanks guys. ive put a s/s manifold on a 180, turned blue, then purple, then gold, then brown and is starting to rust in the crevices, no dramas yet though, and its been almost a year....  

the HKS is a much better design than the original, but does it sit the tubo in the same place?

i may go external, but thats a long time away...my turbo of choice at the moment is a 2835 pro with internal gate.

cheers

Linton

The hks manifold doesn't sit the turbo in the same place. It is actually sitting lower and slightly further back. Also it is bottom mount (for lack of a better term) rather than side mounted as the stock manifold.

The provision for an extenal gate on the manifold can be blocked simply by using a hks 38mm ex gate gasket gasket and a thick steel plate bolted in place

Because of the change in position you will have to fabricate a new compressor inlet, new compressor outlet, new oil and water lines, new oil return, and new dump pipe (and possibly front pipe too). The manifolds look a million times better than the stock cast item, with individual runners rather than the factory log design.

I'll have one on my car in the not too distant future. It's sitting in the garage atm.

Look at getting a steampipe one made up too. At least get a quote to get an idea of price.

A thing that hasnt been mentioned is... On the exaust side of things heat isnt a full on bad thing, hotter air is thinner, thinner air moves faster. Stainless doesnt hold in the heat as good, so it gets in to the engine bay (=bad) and doesnt stay in the pipes meaning cooler air in the pipes (= also not so good).

So Id say steampipe or cast. Have a look, and then if you get the cast one, have a look at extrusion honing that as well.

ok, i dont want to have do do that much work...i just want a manifold that i can bolt on to the standard turbo, as mine is hiflowed and i like it just the way it is. anyone know of a decent manifold that keeps the turbo in the same position.

cheers

Linton

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...