Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm toying with the idea of making a custom box in fibreglass for my boot. I'm comfortable with my grasp of the fibreglassing however I'm concerned about sound quality.

Basically it will be for a 10" PPI single driver. I've had a few ideas of how I could install it nicely but I'm wondering if there are any basic guidelines of what I should and shouldn't do.

1- need to determine the optimal size as currently my sub is very boomy and produces great bass for hip hop, but does not produce enough responsive bass when I listen to hardcore dance music. I'd like to correct this and determine the optimal size for the enclosure.

2- having worked out the enclosure, I'm wondering does shape matter? One of the setups I've been considering is to have the box fit under my strut brace, but this would mean it doesn't have much clearance behind the drive on the inside of the box and I'm wondering if this is bad.

3- does it matter about sound bouncing around inside the enclosure? this relates to the question 2.

4- should I be pointing my sub into the cabin, out the back of the car, sideways, reverse mounting?

Thanks.

download blaubox off the net and have a play with it. as long as you have the volume behind the sub correct it *should* work ( I'm not building the box hence *should*) may want to pop a bit of SD in it as well.

port length and diameter are very important for reverb the sub gives, this should be given by the program your using to calculate box volume with, i personally use WSID, its quite good and lets you model the gains in different frequencies quite easily, also gives port length and diameter needed

Okay someonestolecc, I'll address your points in your original post one at a time.

1. Sadly you cannot simply chuck any sub into any enclosure. What you need to do is take into account how loud you want it, what you listen too, the available power on tap and most importantly, the Thiele / Small parameters of the sub driver. Once you have all these determined it is often easier to chuck them all into a program but if you want to email me I can explain how to do them all with a calculator.

2. If the enclosure is sealed than shape does not matter at all so long as there is sufficient room behind the PPI driver to let the pole cent flow air. If you don't leave sufficient space you risk overheating the sub because it cools through the vent. Now if the enclosure is ported then you also need to make sure you leave enough room for the air to flow freely from the cone backside to the port.

3. See question 2.

4. Which way should you aim your subwoofer? The aiming of subwoofers has been quite a topic of speculation for years now in car audio. Through experimenting many people have found that their subwoofers sound much better when aimed backwards. Many people realise that there seems to be much more bass with the boot open than with the boot closed. We've heard a great deal of strange and utterly incorrect theories to explain this phenomenon.

The main reason this phenomenon occurs is all about sound waves (direct and reflected) and more importantly the cancellation of these waves. The diagrams below assist in showing the sine waves and their phase relationships between the direct sound wave entering the car and the reflected wave that hits the back of the boot and reflects forward. Since the reflection is bounced into the listening area one can treat them much the same as having two sources.

aiming_1.jpg

In the above picture the vertical black line at the left of the picture is the boot rear panel (the beaver panel the tail lights are mounted on). This picture is an illustration of what happens when sound comes out of the front side of the subwoofer enclosure. Sound travels forward into the car (the red wave) and also backwards to reflect off of the back of the boot (the purple wave). Both the direct wave and reflected wave get to the listener but they are way out of phase causing enormous cancellation in the listening area. At this stage if you opened the boot the reflected wave would disappear and NOT reflect back into the car, thus resulting in no cancellation

aiming_2.jpg

In the picture above picture the speaker box has been aimed at the boot instead of the rear seat and you can clearly see the direct and reflected waves are not nearly as much out of phase as in the first example. This resulting in much better bass reproduction.

aiming_3.jpg

This picture above represents the subwoofer enclosure being moved to the rear of the trunk with the subwoofer aiming forward. The waves are a little closer to being in phase with each other.

aiming_4.jpg

In this picture (above) we're aiming the rear mounted subwoofer enclosure at the rear so the direct and reflected wave are very close to being in perfect phase from the start and hence they reinforcing each other quite well.

Note; these pictures are simulated using a 60Hz note with the rear of the box mounted approximately 3 feet from the back of the boot. Keep in mind we're only discussing the direct and rear reflected sound in an effort to try to simplify this. The reflecting sound waves in a car are much more complex than these drawings indicate but we must start simple before getting too carried away. This explanation should be a nice foundation for those of you who wish to study this phenomenon further. One other thing we should mention is that before people comment that this cannot be true because the interior of cars being small in relation to bass wavelengths, the full wavelength does not have to completely develop to be in or out of phase with its own reflected sound. The pictures above are showing a 60Hz wavelength and the bounce distance to reflect back out of phase a complete 180 degrees is just over 4 foot. At higher frequencies the distance is less (120Hz is 2.3ft for example).

Hope that sorts your questions. :)

Thanks for the reply mokompri and Marty - very detailed thank you.

Thanks for going through point by point.

I do recall reading up on that sometime a while back and studying the diagrams you've posted - I think it may have been your article actually.

I've looked at blaubox and I can't seem to make sense of it. I mean, I can work it, I'm just not entirely sure of what it's telling me.

1. Sadly you cannot simply chuck any sub into any enclosure. What you need to do is take into account how loud you want it, what you listen too, the available power on tap and most importantly, the Thiele / Small parameters of the sub driver. Once you have all these determined it is often easier to chuck them all into a program but if you want to email me I can explain how to do them all with a calculator.

How loud do I want it - I like to have my eyes blur. I think I've mentioned this before to you but until I can afford my idmax and 1.400 I have to stick to this :cheers:

What I listen to - hip hop and hardcore dance music (fast responsive bass). Unfortunately I think these two music styles are opposed when trying to build a system. As it stands the system is fine for hip hop. It's a joke when I try to play 150bpm hard hitting Euro hardcore and old school trance with 808's and 303's.

Available power on tap - Actually this is a strange one. It's being run by a noname amp that according to calculations (my mate who sold it to me measured the current it was drawing) it *should* be able to pull 400wrms or so. I'm not sure at what ohm but considering I paid $50 for it it can't be *that* good. As I understand it this simply means the enclosure can't be too small because the amp can't push/pull the woofer fast enough to be responsive.

The thiele/small parameters - What the? I can't seem to find the PPI driver on the net. Can I work this out somehow?

As far as I understand it, I need to make the enclosure smaller than it is at the moment, so that it's more responsive, but that assumes that my amp is powerful enough to drive the woofer properly.

The guy who sold me the sub+box said he made the box using calculations from a program. I'm scared that he's made it optimal already, but on the other hand I refuse to believe a sub could be so sloppy that it can't keep up with 120-150bpm music.

Plus I'm itching to try fibreglassing - seems I could make it lighter than the mdf in my boot currently, and reclaim my bootspace :)

Consequently any extra help (or spoonfeeding (it feels like)) greatly appreciated :innocent:

The PPI flat piston subwoofers are very good subs and they can sound very controlled and tight in the correct enclosure. Especially the 10" if it has sufficient power running it.

Acording to the info I have on the Skyline and the program I use (WinISD), the enclosure (if sealed) should be around 0.422cf to achieve a good sound quality Q (0.7). :P

But anywhere up to 0.9cf will work, the Q just goes down to 0.55. :(

I'll check to see exactly what size woofer it is. I'm pretty sure it's a 10". How do I tell if it's the flat piston type?

I don't actually have a skyline it's in a cefiro - I can measure the boot if that helps?

Thanks again fhrx!

D'oh that's not it. Mine says PPI on the front I think.

Perhaps it was a look-alike brand it was sold to me as -

Precision Power 12" Subwoofers. They are inside a closed inclosure box

model: PP124

Good budget SQ Sub.  

size: 12"

Nominal Power Handling 300 Watt

Peak Power Handling 500 Watt

Impedance 4 ohm

Admittedly I didn't pay that much for it but I'm pretty sure it's the sub attached to this post.

Hay you mentioned flat piston subs first!! hehe

Thanks very much for the volume. Hopefully this will improve my response and at the very least if it's the same as it is now I'll be happy to have some more bootspace :)

Is there anything else I need to know before I start? I might give this a go in the next month or so as soon as I have some more money to buy fibreglass and paint etc and think about the design of mounting amps etc. When I do I will post up pics.

Hay you mentioned flat piston subs first!! hehe

True, my bad. :rant:

Is there anything else I need to know before I start? I might give this a go in the next month or so as soon as I have some more money to buy fibreglass and paint etc and think about the design of mounting amps etc. When I do I will post up pics.

I can offer a few pointers for fibreglassing. Making fibreglass and carbon fibre (including Kevlar) parts in not overly hard, it is just time consuming when you have to sand the thing to perfection. :)

I think one of the most important things to remember when creating fibreglass enclosure is preparation. Some things to consider are:

* What do you want the final enclosure to look like?

* Will you need a basic guide frame to hold the shape it up because the glass get heavy and sags once the resin in on it. Many people forget this.

* Have you double masked everywhere where it could potentially drip? I.e., not just under the enclosure itself. What about too and from the car?

* Have you considered ventilation. I've seen one or two installers knock themselves stupid quite a bit whilst trying to glass inside cars without ventilation.

* Make sure you have plenty of rags, presol and acetone etc on hand to save any potential spills. Better to assume the worst and have it close at hand rather than rushing around looking for it once the resin begins going off.

* Make sure you put quite a few layers on because high quality subs can push titanic amounts of air pressure when angry.

Can I assume you've already know all about the mixing process and protective gear like gloves etc?

Post picces as soon as you can! :)

Thanks Marty that's great pointers.

I did not think about it sagging actually - I have noticed this. Is chicken wire a good mitigating strategy? I was thinking of taking the initial mould from the plug in 2 or more parts. Once I have the basic design rip the chicken wire out of it (I don't like the idea of unnessary parts being left on the inside) then put it all together with more fibreglass.

I'm familar with the mdf ring and dowel technique that's on the net so I'm trying that. Then stretch the fabric over it and keep glassing.

I don't usually use gloves, I might start. I have a respirator that's rated for asbestos so I'm assuming fibreglass particles aren't smaller than asbestos - otherwise I'm screwed.

How many layers do you suggest? I was thinking 5-10 light ones but I always don't want to make it too heavy.

Will I need to sand between fibreglass/resin applications if it dries? I've read this somewhere but it didn't seem necessary.

Thanks again. Pics will be up when I do it step by step for others :)

In answer to your questions champ:

1. Yeah chicken wire is fine. There are many different ways to get the shape because remember stretching cloth only works with certain shapes. E.g. try stretching cloth to get this shape:

fhrxs15rr-1.jpg

:rant:

2. As for strenght testing, we use a highly scientific, highly advanded, secretly developed motorised testing system on out enclosures made from glass; I take em out on the driverway and drive over em! :):D:D If it takes that, then it's strong enough.:crazy:

3. Test for leaks and volume by slowly filling it with water one litre at a time.

4. An asbestos mask should be fine for when you're sanding it but I was referring to when you actually apply the resin; just be careful the fumes don't get to you.

5. When making the enclosure give each layer a light sand between coats just to remove little nicks and pricks sticking up.

Awesome. Thanks. With that I should be armed with everything I need to know.

Need a part time installer who doesn't play any instruments? :)

I think I'll be okay with the chickenwire because the shape will more or less be rectangular but it need to go around the strut brace. It will also try to be semi stealth and very practical.

I was more concerned that if I didn't do it all in one peice it wouldn't got as well. Is it okay to make the initial moulds of the plug in more than one piece then join them up and re fit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...