Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've notice a lot of nissan imports such as Skylines, Silvia's etc have random in cabin heat. That is the heater seems to run itself even when its off and pump heat out at the feet when it feels its cold outside. It seems to decide that its cold out side and it should warm up the drivers and passengers legs. You can feel the heat come out. If you turn on the Heat/AC and put it to say 18 deg and let it go for a second u get cold air. If you then turn it off and wait about a minute the warm/hot air comes back and its like self heating again. It doesn't always do it and just a very odd little feature I noticed.

Does anyone else have this same feature? Any ideas what it basis it's "turn on " action on? When does it decide to come on? What temp does it run for, and how long?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80458-nissan-import-random-in-cabin-heat/
Share on other sites

From what i notice, even when the climate control is off, you can adjust the temp by pressing up and down. It also seems to 'leak' air into the cabin at whatever temp you have it set to like you say... But usually if i leave it on 18 hot air doesnt' come in.. if i leave it on 25 hot air does come in etc...

when the air is turned off the vents near the peddles open up. Other than that, my 33 doesnt leak any hot / cold air.

Does your car have the 'auto' button next to the a/c button ?

'auto' button turns climate control on / off :)

I get what ferni gets. Cold air if the knob on the climate control is on cold and hot air leaks when on hottest. I leave it on hottest cos it makes driving in winter with the window down bearable without running the heater.

ill have to do some testing. but yes i do have the auto bottom, but if you press that it comes on and the display shows temp and fan speed etc. but i have this problem when its off. like no display at all. my mate with an s13 silvia had the same thing, just random heat comes out even when the heater/aircon are off. ive heard of this from a few nissan import owners. sounds like somethinf theyve done on purpose based on the jap climate ??

same thing happens on my R33.

Justin: Its not a breeze, its just the slightest bit of warm air, and you can only *just* feel it. Seems to me it must be a feature that Nissan include, like Paul said, due to the cold climate in Japan.

I have seen this on Paul's car as well as another 33 similar vintage for no known reason you dont nesicarly feel the heat blowing either it just seems to radiate almost.

The thing with the heat really constant is it just doesnt stop and you get to a point where you have to do a heat dump or else you will just start to overheat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...