Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a 180 and basic mods fmic,bov,larger dump pipe.exhause, intake etc

i have all stock internals and standard ecu...and my guess is my car is runnin pretty rich

i was checking my avcr the other day..and the injector duty (on idle) was at 89%-90%, while driving is 84% average

i know if it hit over the 80 mark..somethings not right..im right now in the process of looking for a safc II...bacuse im too tight to buy a pfc

my question is...can safc fix the injector problem?...i mean if i up the air flow....i will make more power...but the fuel comsuption is still there....i want to save more petrol...with petrol prices around $1.20 p litre...its hektik

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81409-injector-duty-question/
Share on other sites

Safc alone does not necessarily lower the injector duty. Let me try and elaborate. say a car is running a flat 12 afr with a injector duty of 90. By using a FPR and upping the fuel rail pressure, this will make too much fuel get injected. So you use the safc to lower the amount. As a result of the FPR and safc combined, the car is now running a higher fuel rail pressure, yet it is still injecting the same amount of fuel with a duty of 80 and making the same power. raise the fuel rail pressure even more to further lower the duty cycle.

If your car is running rich, that means it's injecting too much fuel. By using the safc to lean out the mixture, that is, inject less fuel for the given air, it is reducing the duty cycle. However, I don't think a slight correcting of the afr using an safc will lower the duty cycle that much.

Your car wouldn't run if it was running injector duty of 80% at idle, it would stall instantly. It should be running around 1-3% duty at idle.

Yes an afc will allow you to adjust the duty the injectors are running, how else are you going to adjust the amount of fuel going into the engine down?

Your duty should increase as revs increase and as load increases. For example 7000rpm on 12psi at WOT may be reading 80% where as at half throttle only 60% (only an example) and at 3500 rpm at half throttle maybe 30%.

The duty of the injector basically tells you how much fuel is getting put into the engine (assuming fuel pressure and injector size is constant). The fact that your AVCR is stating duty of higher than 80% at idle tells me that your avcr is reading incorrectly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...