Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

i am about to consider 2 different skylines up for sale now.

1. 1996 GTST S2 80,000kms

- Almost stock except for : Pod filter , new sony stereo with pioneer speakers, 16" wheels, clean interior, with rego

2. 1997 GTST S2 97,000kms

with mods like : Pod filter, forward strut brace, 17" rims with Bridgestones tyres, Rusty rotors, kenwood stereo, 3" cat back, turbo timer, only changed the timing belt, no rego

The 1997 model is about $1000 more expensive than the 96 model.

Guys, which one do you think will be a better buy? i am sure more people will be attracted to the 1997 model since it's a later year??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81960-buying-an-r33-gtst-s2/
Share on other sites

go off condition not off the km's/year model. Their is only one year in build date difference so i wouldnt worry to much about that, they are both S2's.

check carpets, wear on steering wheel and hand break. also get it checked out properly by a mechanic

Not entirely true. Who knows with half the cars that get sold they would have mods done to them and people return them back to stock. you would never know if done properly. Id disregard the k's year and mods and go for the one thats in the best nick. Get a compression and leak down test done on the motor and go from there.

guys what's a compression test and leak down test??? Where can i get it and how much will that cost me? I decided to go for the 96 skyline as it is in real good condition inside out..comes with brand new pioneer speakers..the owner is a great guy anyway...very honest guy and i should say he is pretty trustworthy...Guys how much do you think the 96 skyline will cost...it's stock as...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • List all of your mods. It sounds like an aftermarket ECU hitting rev limiter. Like a valet mode, or a cold rpm limiter? 
    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
×
×
  • Create New...